Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three treatment modalities – tetracycline fibers, scaling and root planing, and combination therapy: A clinical study

BACKGROUND: Tetracycline is one of the primary antibiotics prescribed for antimicrobial therapy in periodontics. It has a broad spectrum of activity being effective against most bacteria as well as spirochetes. Due to limitations of systemic drug therapy, recent formulations of the drug for local ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dang, Aashima Bajaj, Chaubey, Krishan Kumar, Thakur, Rajesh Kumar, Mohan, Ranjana, Chowdhary, Zoya, Tripathi, Richa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238141
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_52_17
_version_ 1783283343184363520
author Dang, Aashima Bajaj
Chaubey, Krishan Kumar
Thakur, Rajesh Kumar
Mohan, Ranjana
Chowdhary, Zoya
Tripathi, Richa
author_facet Dang, Aashima Bajaj
Chaubey, Krishan Kumar
Thakur, Rajesh Kumar
Mohan, Ranjana
Chowdhary, Zoya
Tripathi, Richa
author_sort Dang, Aashima Bajaj
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tetracycline is one of the primary antibiotics prescribed for antimicrobial therapy in periodontics. It has a broad spectrum of activity being effective against most bacteria as well as spirochetes. Due to limitations of systemic drug therapy, recent formulations of the drug for local administration in the subgingival area have been introduced, including collagen fibers impregnated with tetracycline. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of tetracycline fibers alone or in combination with scaling and root planing (SRP) on clinical parameters in chronic periodontitis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of twenty patients comprising of both sexes in the age group of 35-60 years with chronic periodontitis were selected. Split-mouth design was used, and three teeth from each patient with periodontal pocket measuring > 5 mm were selected which were treated with different treatment modality. They were randomly divided into site A (SRP), site B (tetracycline fibers only), and site C (combination therapy). Clinical parameters of plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), pocket probing depth, and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded at 0, 30, and 45 days. The data obtained was compiled and put to statistical analysis. RESULTS: All the three groups showed improvement in PI, GI, probing pocket depth, and CAL. Results of the study showed greater improvements in clinical parameters in Group C compared to Group A and Group B. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the adjunctive use of tetracycline fibers with SRP is a clinically effective and simple nonsurgical treatment method to improve periodontal health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5713084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57130842017-12-13 Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three treatment modalities – tetracycline fibers, scaling and root planing, and combination therapy: A clinical study Dang, Aashima Bajaj Chaubey, Krishan Kumar Thakur, Rajesh Kumar Mohan, Ranjana Chowdhary, Zoya Tripathi, Richa J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: Tetracycline is one of the primary antibiotics prescribed for antimicrobial therapy in periodontics. It has a broad spectrum of activity being effective against most bacteria as well as spirochetes. Due to limitations of systemic drug therapy, recent formulations of the drug for local administration in the subgingival area have been introduced, including collagen fibers impregnated with tetracycline. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of tetracycline fibers alone or in combination with scaling and root planing (SRP) on clinical parameters in chronic periodontitis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of twenty patients comprising of both sexes in the age group of 35-60 years with chronic periodontitis were selected. Split-mouth design was used, and three teeth from each patient with periodontal pocket measuring > 5 mm were selected which were treated with different treatment modality. They were randomly divided into site A (SRP), site B (tetracycline fibers only), and site C (combination therapy). Clinical parameters of plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), pocket probing depth, and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded at 0, 30, and 45 days. The data obtained was compiled and put to statistical analysis. RESULTS: All the three groups showed improvement in PI, GI, probing pocket depth, and CAL. Results of the study showed greater improvements in clinical parameters in Group C compared to Group A and Group B. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the adjunctive use of tetracycline fibers with SRP is a clinically effective and simple nonsurgical treatment method to improve periodontal health. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5713084/ /pubmed/29238141 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_52_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dang, Aashima Bajaj
Chaubey, Krishan Kumar
Thakur, Rajesh Kumar
Mohan, Ranjana
Chowdhary, Zoya
Tripathi, Richa
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three treatment modalities – tetracycline fibers, scaling and root planing, and combination therapy: A clinical study
title Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three treatment modalities – tetracycline fibers, scaling and root planing, and combination therapy: A clinical study
title_full Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three treatment modalities – tetracycline fibers, scaling and root planing, and combination therapy: A clinical study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three treatment modalities – tetracycline fibers, scaling and root planing, and combination therapy: A clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three treatment modalities – tetracycline fibers, scaling and root planing, and combination therapy: A clinical study
title_short Comparative evaluation of efficacy of three treatment modalities – tetracycline fibers, scaling and root planing, and combination therapy: A clinical study
title_sort comparative evaluation of efficacy of three treatment modalities – tetracycline fibers, scaling and root planing, and combination therapy: a clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238141
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_52_17
work_keys_str_mv AT dangaashimabajaj comparativeevaluationofefficacyofthreetreatmentmodalitiestetracyclinefibersscalingandrootplaningandcombinationtherapyaclinicalstudy
AT chaubeykrishankumar comparativeevaluationofefficacyofthreetreatmentmodalitiestetracyclinefibersscalingandrootplaningandcombinationtherapyaclinicalstudy
AT thakurrajeshkumar comparativeevaluationofefficacyofthreetreatmentmodalitiestetracyclinefibersscalingandrootplaningandcombinationtherapyaclinicalstudy
AT mohanranjana comparativeevaluationofefficacyofthreetreatmentmodalitiestetracyclinefibersscalingandrootplaningandcombinationtherapyaclinicalstudy
AT chowdharyzoya comparativeevaluationofefficacyofthreetreatmentmodalitiestetracyclinefibersscalingandrootplaningandcombinationtherapyaclinicalstudy
AT tripathiricha comparativeevaluationofefficacyofthreetreatmentmodalitiestetracyclinefibersscalingandrootplaningandcombinationtherapyaclinicalstudy