Cargando…

Inter-Species Host Gene Expression Differences in Response to Human and Avian Influenza A Virus Strains

Low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) viruses are a source of sporadic human infections and could also contribute to future pandemic outbreaks but little is known about inter-species differences in the host responses to these viruses. Here, we studied host gene expression signatures of cell lines fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taye, Biruhalem, Yeo, Dawn, Lee, Raphael Tze Chuen, Tan, Boon Huan, Sugrue, Richard J., Maurer-Stroh, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104227
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112295
_version_ 1783283383999135744
author Taye, Biruhalem
Yeo, Dawn
Lee, Raphael Tze Chuen
Tan, Boon Huan
Sugrue, Richard J.
Maurer-Stroh, Sebastian
author_facet Taye, Biruhalem
Yeo, Dawn
Lee, Raphael Tze Chuen
Tan, Boon Huan
Sugrue, Richard J.
Maurer-Stroh, Sebastian
author_sort Taye, Biruhalem
collection PubMed
description Low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) viruses are a source of sporadic human infections and could also contribute to future pandemic outbreaks but little is known about inter-species differences in the host responses to these viruses. Here, we studied host gene expression signatures of cell lines from three species (human, chicken, and canine) in response to six different viruses (H1N1/WSN, H5N2/F59, H5N2/F118, H5N2/F189, H5N3 and H9N2). Comprehensive microarray probe set re-annotation and ortholog mapping of the host genes was necessary to allow comparison over extended functionally annotated gene sets and orthologous pathways. The annotations are made available to the community for commonly used microarray chips. We observe a strong tendency of the response being cell type- rather than virus-specific. In chicken cells, we found up-regulation of host factors inducing virus infectivity (e.g., oxysterol binding protein like 1A (OSBPL1A) and Rho GTPase activating protein 21 (ARHGAP21)) while reducing apoptosis (e.g., mitochondrial ribosomal protein S27 (MRPS27)) and increasing cell proliferation (e.g., COP9 signalosome subunit 2 (COPS2)). On the other hand, increased antiviral, pro-apoptotic and inflammatory signatures have been identified in human cells while cell cycle and metabolic pathways were down-regulated. This signature describes how low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) viruses are being tolerated and shed from chicken but potentially causing cellular disruption in mammalian cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5713265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57132652017-12-07 Inter-Species Host Gene Expression Differences in Response to Human and Avian Influenza A Virus Strains Taye, Biruhalem Yeo, Dawn Lee, Raphael Tze Chuen Tan, Boon Huan Sugrue, Richard J. Maurer-Stroh, Sebastian Int J Mol Sci Article Low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) viruses are a source of sporadic human infections and could also contribute to future pandemic outbreaks but little is known about inter-species differences in the host responses to these viruses. Here, we studied host gene expression signatures of cell lines from three species (human, chicken, and canine) in response to six different viruses (H1N1/WSN, H5N2/F59, H5N2/F118, H5N2/F189, H5N3 and H9N2). Comprehensive microarray probe set re-annotation and ortholog mapping of the host genes was necessary to allow comparison over extended functionally annotated gene sets and orthologous pathways. The annotations are made available to the community for commonly used microarray chips. We observe a strong tendency of the response being cell type- rather than virus-specific. In chicken cells, we found up-regulation of host factors inducing virus infectivity (e.g., oxysterol binding protein like 1A (OSBPL1A) and Rho GTPase activating protein 21 (ARHGAP21)) while reducing apoptosis (e.g., mitochondrial ribosomal protein S27 (MRPS27)) and increasing cell proliferation (e.g., COP9 signalosome subunit 2 (COPS2)). On the other hand, increased antiviral, pro-apoptotic and inflammatory signatures have been identified in human cells while cell cycle and metabolic pathways were down-regulated. This signature describes how low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) viruses are being tolerated and shed from chicken but potentially causing cellular disruption in mammalian cells. MDPI 2017-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5713265/ /pubmed/29104227 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112295 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Taye, Biruhalem
Yeo, Dawn
Lee, Raphael Tze Chuen
Tan, Boon Huan
Sugrue, Richard J.
Maurer-Stroh, Sebastian
Inter-Species Host Gene Expression Differences in Response to Human and Avian Influenza A Virus Strains
title Inter-Species Host Gene Expression Differences in Response to Human and Avian Influenza A Virus Strains
title_full Inter-Species Host Gene Expression Differences in Response to Human and Avian Influenza A Virus Strains
title_fullStr Inter-Species Host Gene Expression Differences in Response to Human and Avian Influenza A Virus Strains
title_full_unstemmed Inter-Species Host Gene Expression Differences in Response to Human and Avian Influenza A Virus Strains
title_short Inter-Species Host Gene Expression Differences in Response to Human and Avian Influenza A Virus Strains
title_sort inter-species host gene expression differences in response to human and avian influenza a virus strains
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104227
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112295
work_keys_str_mv AT tayebiruhalem interspecieshostgeneexpressiondifferencesinresponsetohumanandavianinfluenzaavirusstrains
AT yeodawn interspecieshostgeneexpressiondifferencesinresponsetohumanandavianinfluenzaavirusstrains
AT leeraphaeltzechuen interspecieshostgeneexpressiondifferencesinresponsetohumanandavianinfluenzaavirusstrains
AT tanboonhuan interspecieshostgeneexpressiondifferencesinresponsetohumanandavianinfluenzaavirusstrains
AT sugruerichardj interspecieshostgeneexpressiondifferencesinresponsetohumanandavianinfluenzaavirusstrains
AT maurerstrohsebastian interspecieshostgeneexpressiondifferencesinresponsetohumanandavianinfluenzaavirusstrains