Cargando…

Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma?

Pelvic Melanoma relapse occurs in 15% of patients with loco regional metastases, and 25% of cases do not respond to new target-therapy and/or immunotherapy. Melphalan hypoxic pelvic perfusion may, therefore, be an option for these non-responsive patients. Overall median survival time (MST), stratifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guadagni, Stefano, Fiorentini, Giammaria, Clementi, Marco, Palumbo, Giancarlo, Palumbo, Paola, Chiominto, Alessandro, Baldoni, Stefano, Masedu, Francesco, Valenti, Marco, Di Tommaso, Ambra, Fabi, Bianca, Aliberti, Camillo, Sarti, Donatella, Guadagni, Veronica, Pellegrini, Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29120401
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112382
_version_ 1783283404765134848
author Guadagni, Stefano
Fiorentini, Giammaria
Clementi, Marco
Palumbo, Giancarlo
Palumbo, Paola
Chiominto, Alessandro
Baldoni, Stefano
Masedu, Francesco
Valenti, Marco
Di Tommaso, Ambra
Fabi, Bianca
Aliberti, Camillo
Sarti, Donatella
Guadagni, Veronica
Pellegrini, Cristina
author_facet Guadagni, Stefano
Fiorentini, Giammaria
Clementi, Marco
Palumbo, Giancarlo
Palumbo, Paola
Chiominto, Alessandro
Baldoni, Stefano
Masedu, Francesco
Valenti, Marco
Di Tommaso, Ambra
Fabi, Bianca
Aliberti, Camillo
Sarti, Donatella
Guadagni, Veronica
Pellegrini, Cristina
author_sort Guadagni, Stefano
collection PubMed
description Pelvic Melanoma relapse occurs in 15% of patients with loco regional metastases, and 25% of cases do not respond to new target-therapy and/or immunotherapy. Melphalan hypoxic pelvic perfusion may, therefore, be an option for these non-responsive patients. Overall median survival time (MST), stratified for variables, including BRAF V600E mutation and eligibility for treatments with new immunotherapy drugs, was retrospectively assessed in 41 patients with pelvic melanoma loco regional metastases. They had received a total of 175 treatments with Melphalan hypoxic perfusion and cytoreductive excision. Among the 41 patients, 22 (53.7%) patients exhibited a wild-type BRAF genotype, 11 of which were not eligible for immunotherapy. The first treatment resulted in a 97.5% response-rate in the full cohort and a 100% response-rate in the 22 wild-type BRAF patients. MST was 18 months in the full sample, 20 months for the 22 wild-type BRAF patients and 21 months for the 11 wild-type BRAF patients not eligible for immunotherapy. Melphalan hypoxic perfusion is a potentially effective treatment for patients with pelvic melanoma loco regional metastases that requires confirmation in a larger multicenter study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5713351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57133512017-12-07 Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma? Guadagni, Stefano Fiorentini, Giammaria Clementi, Marco Palumbo, Giancarlo Palumbo, Paola Chiominto, Alessandro Baldoni, Stefano Masedu, Francesco Valenti, Marco Di Tommaso, Ambra Fabi, Bianca Aliberti, Camillo Sarti, Donatella Guadagni, Veronica Pellegrini, Cristina Int J Mol Sci Article Pelvic Melanoma relapse occurs in 15% of patients with loco regional metastases, and 25% of cases do not respond to new target-therapy and/or immunotherapy. Melphalan hypoxic pelvic perfusion may, therefore, be an option for these non-responsive patients. Overall median survival time (MST), stratified for variables, including BRAF V600E mutation and eligibility for treatments with new immunotherapy drugs, was retrospectively assessed in 41 patients with pelvic melanoma loco regional metastases. They had received a total of 175 treatments with Melphalan hypoxic perfusion and cytoreductive excision. Among the 41 patients, 22 (53.7%) patients exhibited a wild-type BRAF genotype, 11 of which were not eligible for immunotherapy. The first treatment resulted in a 97.5% response-rate in the full cohort and a 100% response-rate in the 22 wild-type BRAF patients. MST was 18 months in the full sample, 20 months for the 22 wild-type BRAF patients and 21 months for the 11 wild-type BRAF patients not eligible for immunotherapy. Melphalan hypoxic perfusion is a potentially effective treatment for patients with pelvic melanoma loco regional metastases that requires confirmation in a larger multicenter study. MDPI 2017-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5713351/ /pubmed/29120401 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112382 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guadagni, Stefano
Fiorentini, Giammaria
Clementi, Marco
Palumbo, Giancarlo
Palumbo, Paola
Chiominto, Alessandro
Baldoni, Stefano
Masedu, Francesco
Valenti, Marco
Di Tommaso, Ambra
Fabi, Bianca
Aliberti, Camillo
Sarti, Donatella
Guadagni, Veronica
Pellegrini, Cristina
Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma?
title Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma?
title_full Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma?
title_fullStr Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma?
title_full_unstemmed Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma?
title_short Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma?
title_sort does locoregional chemotherapy still matter in the treatment of advanced pelvic melanoma?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29120401
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112382
work_keys_str_mv AT guadagnistefano doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT fiorentinigiammaria doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT clementimarco doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT palumbogiancarlo doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT palumbopaola doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT chiomintoalessandro doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT baldonistefano doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT masedufrancesco doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT valentimarco doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT ditommasoambra doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT fabibianca doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT aliberticamillo doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT sartidonatella doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT guadagniveronica doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma
AT pellegrinicristina doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma