Cargando…
Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma?
Pelvic Melanoma relapse occurs in 15% of patients with loco regional metastases, and 25% of cases do not respond to new target-therapy and/or immunotherapy. Melphalan hypoxic pelvic perfusion may, therefore, be an option for these non-responsive patients. Overall median survival time (MST), stratifi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29120401 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112382 |
_version_ | 1783283404765134848 |
---|---|
author | Guadagni, Stefano Fiorentini, Giammaria Clementi, Marco Palumbo, Giancarlo Palumbo, Paola Chiominto, Alessandro Baldoni, Stefano Masedu, Francesco Valenti, Marco Di Tommaso, Ambra Fabi, Bianca Aliberti, Camillo Sarti, Donatella Guadagni, Veronica Pellegrini, Cristina |
author_facet | Guadagni, Stefano Fiorentini, Giammaria Clementi, Marco Palumbo, Giancarlo Palumbo, Paola Chiominto, Alessandro Baldoni, Stefano Masedu, Francesco Valenti, Marco Di Tommaso, Ambra Fabi, Bianca Aliberti, Camillo Sarti, Donatella Guadagni, Veronica Pellegrini, Cristina |
author_sort | Guadagni, Stefano |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pelvic Melanoma relapse occurs in 15% of patients with loco regional metastases, and 25% of cases do not respond to new target-therapy and/or immunotherapy. Melphalan hypoxic pelvic perfusion may, therefore, be an option for these non-responsive patients. Overall median survival time (MST), stratified for variables, including BRAF V600E mutation and eligibility for treatments with new immunotherapy drugs, was retrospectively assessed in 41 patients with pelvic melanoma loco regional metastases. They had received a total of 175 treatments with Melphalan hypoxic perfusion and cytoreductive excision. Among the 41 patients, 22 (53.7%) patients exhibited a wild-type BRAF genotype, 11 of which were not eligible for immunotherapy. The first treatment resulted in a 97.5% response-rate in the full cohort and a 100% response-rate in the 22 wild-type BRAF patients. MST was 18 months in the full sample, 20 months for the 22 wild-type BRAF patients and 21 months for the 11 wild-type BRAF patients not eligible for immunotherapy. Melphalan hypoxic perfusion is a potentially effective treatment for patients with pelvic melanoma loco regional metastases that requires confirmation in a larger multicenter study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5713351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57133512017-12-07 Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma? Guadagni, Stefano Fiorentini, Giammaria Clementi, Marco Palumbo, Giancarlo Palumbo, Paola Chiominto, Alessandro Baldoni, Stefano Masedu, Francesco Valenti, Marco Di Tommaso, Ambra Fabi, Bianca Aliberti, Camillo Sarti, Donatella Guadagni, Veronica Pellegrini, Cristina Int J Mol Sci Article Pelvic Melanoma relapse occurs in 15% of patients with loco regional metastases, and 25% of cases do not respond to new target-therapy and/or immunotherapy. Melphalan hypoxic pelvic perfusion may, therefore, be an option for these non-responsive patients. Overall median survival time (MST), stratified for variables, including BRAF V600E mutation and eligibility for treatments with new immunotherapy drugs, was retrospectively assessed in 41 patients with pelvic melanoma loco regional metastases. They had received a total of 175 treatments with Melphalan hypoxic perfusion and cytoreductive excision. Among the 41 patients, 22 (53.7%) patients exhibited a wild-type BRAF genotype, 11 of which were not eligible for immunotherapy. The first treatment resulted in a 97.5% response-rate in the full cohort and a 100% response-rate in the 22 wild-type BRAF patients. MST was 18 months in the full sample, 20 months for the 22 wild-type BRAF patients and 21 months for the 11 wild-type BRAF patients not eligible for immunotherapy. Melphalan hypoxic perfusion is a potentially effective treatment for patients with pelvic melanoma loco regional metastases that requires confirmation in a larger multicenter study. MDPI 2017-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5713351/ /pubmed/29120401 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112382 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Guadagni, Stefano Fiorentini, Giammaria Clementi, Marco Palumbo, Giancarlo Palumbo, Paola Chiominto, Alessandro Baldoni, Stefano Masedu, Francesco Valenti, Marco Di Tommaso, Ambra Fabi, Bianca Aliberti, Camillo Sarti, Donatella Guadagni, Veronica Pellegrini, Cristina Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma? |
title | Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma? |
title_full | Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma? |
title_fullStr | Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma? |
title_short | Does Locoregional Chemotherapy Still Matter in the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Melanoma? |
title_sort | does locoregional chemotherapy still matter in the treatment of advanced pelvic melanoma? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29120401 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guadagnistefano doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT fiorentinigiammaria doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT clementimarco doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT palumbogiancarlo doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT palumbopaola doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT chiomintoalessandro doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT baldonistefano doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT masedufrancesco doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT valentimarco doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT ditommasoambra doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT fabibianca doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT aliberticamillo doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT sartidonatella doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT guadagniveronica doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma AT pellegrinicristina doeslocoregionalchemotherapystillmatterinthetreatmentofadvancedpelvicmelanoma |