Cargando…

‘Image-navigated 3-dimensional late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and initial clinical results’

BACKGROUND: Image-navigated 3-dimensional late gadolinium enhancement (iNAV-3D LGE) is an advanced imaging technique that allows for direct respiratory motion correction of the heart. Its feasibility in a routine clinical setting has not been validated. METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive patients ref...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bratis, Konstantinos, Henningsson, Markus, Grigoratos, Chrysanthos, Dell’Omodarme, Matteo, Chasapides, Konstantinos, Botnar, Rene, Nagel, Eike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0418-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Image-navigated 3-dimensional late gadolinium enhancement (iNAV-3D LGE) is an advanced imaging technique that allows for direct respiratory motion correction of the heart. Its feasibility in a routine clinical setting has not been validated. METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) examination including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging were prospectively enrolled. Image-navigated free-breathing 3-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted gradient-echo LGE and two-dimensional (2D LGE) images were acquired in random order on a 1.5 T CMR system. Images were assessed for global, segmental LGE detection and transmural extent. Objective image quality including signal-to-noise (SNR), contrast-to-noise (CNR) and myocardial/blood sharpness were performed. RESULTS: Interpretable images were obtained in all 2D–LGE and in 22/23 iNAV-3D LGE exams, resulting in a total of 22 datasets and 352 segments. LGE was detected in 5 patients with ischemic pattern, in 7 with non-ischemic pattern, while it was absent in 10 cases. There was an excellent agreement between 2D and 3D data sets with regard to global, segmental LGE detection and transmurality. Blood-myocardium sharpness measurements were also comparable between the two techniques. SNR(blood) and CNR(blood-myo) was significantly higher for 2D LGE (P < 0.001, respectively), while SNR(myo) was not statistically significant between 2D LGE and iNAV-3D LGE. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic performance of iNAV-3D LGE was comparable to 2D LGE in a prospective clinical setting. SNR(blood) and CNR(blood-myo) was significantly lower in the iNAV-3D LGE group.