Cargando…

Patient‐specific independent 3D GammaPlan quality assurance for Gamma Knife Perfexion radiosurgery

One of the most important aspects of quality assurance (QA) in radiation therapy is redundancy of patient treatment dose calculation. This work is focused on the patient‐specific time and 3D dose treatment plan verification for stereotactic radiosurgery using Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion (LGK PFX)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mamalui‐Hunter, Maria, Yaddanapudi, Sridhar, Zhao, Tianyu, Mutic, Sasa, Low, Daniel A., Drzymala, Robert E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23318382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.3949
_version_ 1783283475657261056
author Mamalui‐Hunter, Maria
Yaddanapudi, Sridhar
Zhao, Tianyu
Mutic, Sasa
Low, Daniel A.
Drzymala, Robert E.
author_facet Mamalui‐Hunter, Maria
Yaddanapudi, Sridhar
Zhao, Tianyu
Mutic, Sasa
Low, Daniel A.
Drzymala, Robert E.
author_sort Mamalui‐Hunter, Maria
collection PubMed
description One of the most important aspects of quality assurance (QA) in radiation therapy is redundancy of patient treatment dose calculation. This work is focused on the patient‐specific time and 3D dose treatment plan verification for stereotactic radiosurgery using Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion (LGK PFX). The virtual model of LGK PFX was developed in MATLAB, based on the physical dimensions provided by the manufacturer. The ring‐specific linear attenuation coefficients (LAC) and output factors (OFs) reported by the manufacturer were replaced by the measurement‐based collimator size‐specific OFs and a single [Formula: see text]. Calculation depths for each LGK PFX shot were obtained by ray‐tracing technique, and the dose calculation formalism was similar to the one used by GammaPlan treatment planning software versions 8 and 9. The architecture of the QA process was based on the in‐house online database search of the LGK PFX database search for plan‐specific information. A series of QA phantom plans was examined to verify geometric and dosimetric accuracy of the software. The accuracy of the QA process was further evaluated through evaluation of a series of patient plans. The shot time/focus point dose verification for each shot took less than 1 sec/shot with full 3D isodose verification taking about 30 sec/shot on a desktop PC. GammaPlan database access time took less than 0.05 sec. The geometric accuracy (location of the point of maximum dose) of the phantom and patient plan was dependent on the resolution of the original dose matrix and was of the order of 1 dose element. Dosimetric accuracy of the independently calculated phantom and patient point (focus) doses was within 3.5% from the GammaPlan, with the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. The process for independent pretreatment patient‐specific Gamma Knife Perfexion time and dose verification was created and validated. PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn; 87.55.‐x; 87.56.Bg
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5713665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57136652018-04-02 Patient‐specific independent 3D GammaPlan quality assurance for Gamma Knife Perfexion radiosurgery Mamalui‐Hunter, Maria Yaddanapudi, Sridhar Zhao, Tianyu Mutic, Sasa Low, Daniel A. Drzymala, Robert E. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics One of the most important aspects of quality assurance (QA) in radiation therapy is redundancy of patient treatment dose calculation. This work is focused on the patient‐specific time and 3D dose treatment plan verification for stereotactic radiosurgery using Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion (LGK PFX). The virtual model of LGK PFX was developed in MATLAB, based on the physical dimensions provided by the manufacturer. The ring‐specific linear attenuation coefficients (LAC) and output factors (OFs) reported by the manufacturer were replaced by the measurement‐based collimator size‐specific OFs and a single [Formula: see text]. Calculation depths for each LGK PFX shot were obtained by ray‐tracing technique, and the dose calculation formalism was similar to the one used by GammaPlan treatment planning software versions 8 and 9. The architecture of the QA process was based on the in‐house online database search of the LGK PFX database search for plan‐specific information. A series of QA phantom plans was examined to verify geometric and dosimetric accuracy of the software. The accuracy of the QA process was further evaluated through evaluation of a series of patient plans. The shot time/focus point dose verification for each shot took less than 1 sec/shot with full 3D isodose verification taking about 30 sec/shot on a desktop PC. GammaPlan database access time took less than 0.05 sec. The geometric accuracy (location of the point of maximum dose) of the phantom and patient plan was dependent on the resolution of the original dose matrix and was of the order of 1 dose element. Dosimetric accuracy of the independently calculated phantom and patient point (focus) doses was within 3.5% from the GammaPlan, with the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. The process for independent pretreatment patient‐specific Gamma Knife Perfexion time and dose verification was created and validated. PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn; 87.55.‐x; 87.56.Bg John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5713665/ /pubmed/23318382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.3949 Text en © 2013 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Mamalui‐Hunter, Maria
Yaddanapudi, Sridhar
Zhao, Tianyu
Mutic, Sasa
Low, Daniel A.
Drzymala, Robert E.
Patient‐specific independent 3D GammaPlan quality assurance for Gamma Knife Perfexion radiosurgery
title Patient‐specific independent 3D GammaPlan quality assurance for Gamma Knife Perfexion radiosurgery
title_full Patient‐specific independent 3D GammaPlan quality assurance for Gamma Knife Perfexion radiosurgery
title_fullStr Patient‐specific independent 3D GammaPlan quality assurance for Gamma Knife Perfexion radiosurgery
title_full_unstemmed Patient‐specific independent 3D GammaPlan quality assurance for Gamma Knife Perfexion radiosurgery
title_short Patient‐specific independent 3D GammaPlan quality assurance for Gamma Knife Perfexion radiosurgery
title_sort patient‐specific independent 3d gammaplan quality assurance for gamma knife perfexion radiosurgery
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5713665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23318382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.3949
work_keys_str_mv AT mamaluihuntermaria patientspecificindependent3dgammaplanqualityassuranceforgammaknifeperfexionradiosurgery
AT yaddanapudisridhar patientspecificindependent3dgammaplanqualityassuranceforgammaknifeperfexionradiosurgery
AT zhaotianyu patientspecificindependent3dgammaplanqualityassuranceforgammaknifeperfexionradiosurgery
AT muticsasa patientspecificindependent3dgammaplanqualityassuranceforgammaknifeperfexionradiosurgery
AT lowdaniela patientspecificindependent3dgammaplanqualityassuranceforgammaknifeperfexionradiosurgery
AT drzymalaroberte patientspecificindependent3dgammaplanqualityassuranceforgammaknifeperfexionradiosurgery