Cargando…

Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in restoring the CT image quality while correcting the tissue density information for the accurate estimation of the absorbed dose. A phantom filled with titanium (low‐Z metal) and Cerrobend (high‐Z metal) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spadea, Maria F., Verburg, Joost, Baroni, Guido, Seco, Joao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23318388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.4027
_version_ 1783283518666702848
author Spadea, Maria F.
Verburg, Joost
Baroni, Guido
Seco, Joao
author_facet Spadea, Maria F.
Verburg, Joost
Baroni, Guido
Seco, Joao
author_sort Spadea, Maria F.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to assess the ability of metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in restoring the CT image quality while correcting the tissue density information for the accurate estimation of the absorbed dose. A phantom filled with titanium (low‐Z metal) and Cerrobend (high‐Z metal) inserts was used for this purpose. The MAR algorithm was applied to phantom's CT dataset. Static intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans, including five beam angles, were designed and optimized on the uncorrected images to deliver 10 Gy on the simulated target. Monte Carlo dose calculation was computed on uncorrected, corrected, and ground truth image datasets. It was firstly verified that MAR methodology was able to correct HU errors due to the metal presence. In the worst situation (high‐Z phantom), the image difference, uncorrected ground truth and corrected ground truth, went from [Formula: see text] HU to [Formula: see text] HU, respectively. Secondly, it was observed that the impact of dose errors estimation depends on the atomic number of the metal: low‐Z inserts do not produce significant dose inaccuracies, while high‐Z implants substantially influence the computation of the absorbed dose. In this latter case, dose errors in the PTV region were up to 23.56% (9.72% mean value) when comparing the uncorrected vs. the ground truth dataset. After MAR correction, errors dropped to 0.11% (0.10% mean value). In conclusion, it was assessed that the new MAR algorithm is able to restore image quality without distorting mass density information, thus producing a more accurate dose estimation. PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.55.K, 87.57.cp
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5714056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57140562018-04-02 Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images Spadea, Maria F. Verburg, Joost Baroni, Guido Seco, Joao J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes The aim of this study was to assess the ability of metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in restoring the CT image quality while correcting the tissue density information for the accurate estimation of the absorbed dose. A phantom filled with titanium (low‐Z metal) and Cerrobend (high‐Z metal) inserts was used for this purpose. The MAR algorithm was applied to phantom's CT dataset. Static intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans, including five beam angles, were designed and optimized on the uncorrected images to deliver 10 Gy on the simulated target. Monte Carlo dose calculation was computed on uncorrected, corrected, and ground truth image datasets. It was firstly verified that MAR methodology was able to correct HU errors due to the metal presence. In the worst situation (high‐Z phantom), the image difference, uncorrected ground truth and corrected ground truth, went from [Formula: see text] HU to [Formula: see text] HU, respectively. Secondly, it was observed that the impact of dose errors estimation depends on the atomic number of the metal: low‐Z inserts do not produce significant dose inaccuracies, while high‐Z implants substantially influence the computation of the absorbed dose. In this latter case, dose errors in the PTV region were up to 23.56% (9.72% mean value) when comparing the uncorrected vs. the ground truth dataset. After MAR correction, errors dropped to 0.11% (0.10% mean value). In conclusion, it was assessed that the new MAR algorithm is able to restore image quality without distorting mass density information, thus producing a more accurate dose estimation. PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.55.K, 87.57.cp John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5714056/ /pubmed/23318388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.4027 Text en © 2013 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Spadea, Maria F.
Verburg, Joost
Baroni, Guido
Seco, Joao
Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images
title Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images
title_full Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images
title_fullStr Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images
title_short Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images
title_sort dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in ct images
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23318388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.4027
work_keys_str_mv AT spadeamariaf dosimetricassessmentofanovelmetalartifactreductionmethodinctimages
AT verburgjoost dosimetricassessmentofanovelmetalartifactreductionmethodinctimages
AT baroniguido dosimetricassessmentofanovelmetalartifactreductionmethodinctimages
AT secojoao dosimetricassessmentofanovelmetalartifactreductionmethodinctimages