Cargando…
Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images
The aim of this study was to assess the ability of metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in restoring the CT image quality while correcting the tissue density information for the accurate estimation of the absorbed dose. A phantom filled with titanium (low‐Z metal) and Cerrobend (high‐Z metal) in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23318388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.4027 |
_version_ | 1783283518666702848 |
---|---|
author | Spadea, Maria F. Verburg, Joost Baroni, Guido Seco, Joao |
author_facet | Spadea, Maria F. Verburg, Joost Baroni, Guido Seco, Joao |
author_sort | Spadea, Maria F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to assess the ability of metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in restoring the CT image quality while correcting the tissue density information for the accurate estimation of the absorbed dose. A phantom filled with titanium (low‐Z metal) and Cerrobend (high‐Z metal) inserts was used for this purpose. The MAR algorithm was applied to phantom's CT dataset. Static intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans, including five beam angles, were designed and optimized on the uncorrected images to deliver 10 Gy on the simulated target. Monte Carlo dose calculation was computed on uncorrected, corrected, and ground truth image datasets. It was firstly verified that MAR methodology was able to correct HU errors due to the metal presence. In the worst situation (high‐Z phantom), the image difference, uncorrected ground truth and corrected ground truth, went from [Formula: see text] HU to [Formula: see text] HU, respectively. Secondly, it was observed that the impact of dose errors estimation depends on the atomic number of the metal: low‐Z inserts do not produce significant dose inaccuracies, while high‐Z implants substantially influence the computation of the absorbed dose. In this latter case, dose errors in the PTV region were up to 23.56% (9.72% mean value) when comparing the uncorrected vs. the ground truth dataset. After MAR correction, errors dropped to 0.11% (0.10% mean value). In conclusion, it was assessed that the new MAR algorithm is able to restore image quality without distorting mass density information, thus producing a more accurate dose estimation. PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.55.K, 87.57.cp |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5714056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57140562018-04-02 Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images Spadea, Maria F. Verburg, Joost Baroni, Guido Seco, Joao J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes The aim of this study was to assess the ability of metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in restoring the CT image quality while correcting the tissue density information for the accurate estimation of the absorbed dose. A phantom filled with titanium (low‐Z metal) and Cerrobend (high‐Z metal) inserts was used for this purpose. The MAR algorithm was applied to phantom's CT dataset. Static intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans, including five beam angles, were designed and optimized on the uncorrected images to deliver 10 Gy on the simulated target. Monte Carlo dose calculation was computed on uncorrected, corrected, and ground truth image datasets. It was firstly verified that MAR methodology was able to correct HU errors due to the metal presence. In the worst situation (high‐Z phantom), the image difference, uncorrected ground truth and corrected ground truth, went from [Formula: see text] HU to [Formula: see text] HU, respectively. Secondly, it was observed that the impact of dose errors estimation depends on the atomic number of the metal: low‐Z inserts do not produce significant dose inaccuracies, while high‐Z implants substantially influence the computation of the absorbed dose. In this latter case, dose errors in the PTV region were up to 23.56% (9.72% mean value) when comparing the uncorrected vs. the ground truth dataset. After MAR correction, errors dropped to 0.11% (0.10% mean value). In conclusion, it was assessed that the new MAR algorithm is able to restore image quality without distorting mass density information, thus producing a more accurate dose estimation. PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.55.K, 87.57.cp John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5714056/ /pubmed/23318388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.4027 Text en © 2013 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes Spadea, Maria F. Verburg, Joost Baroni, Guido Seco, Joao Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images |
title | Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images |
title_full | Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images |
title_fullStr | Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images |
title_short | Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images |
title_sort | dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in ct images |
topic | Technical Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23318388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.4027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spadeamariaf dosimetricassessmentofanovelmetalartifactreductionmethodinctimages AT verburgjoost dosimetricassessmentofanovelmetalartifactreductionmethodinctimages AT baroniguido dosimetricassessmentofanovelmetalartifactreductionmethodinctimages AT secojoao dosimetricassessmentofanovelmetalartifactreductionmethodinctimages |