Cargando…

Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German

Dyslexia in consistent orthographies like German is characterized by dysfluent reading, which is often assumed to result from failure to build up an orthographic lexicon and overreliance on decoding. However, earlier evidence indicates effects of lexical processing at least in some German dyslexic r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gangl, Melanie, Moll, Kristina, Jones, Manon W., Banfi, Chiara, Schulte-Körne, Gerd, Landerl, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29249911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1339709
_version_ 1783283536340451328
author Gangl, Melanie
Moll, Kristina
Jones, Manon W.
Banfi, Chiara
Schulte-Körne, Gerd
Landerl, Karin
author_facet Gangl, Melanie
Moll, Kristina
Jones, Manon W.
Banfi, Chiara
Schulte-Körne, Gerd
Landerl, Karin
author_sort Gangl, Melanie
collection PubMed
description Dyslexia in consistent orthographies like German is characterized by dysfluent reading, which is often assumed to result from failure to build up an orthographic lexicon and overreliance on decoding. However, earlier evidence indicates effects of lexical processing at least in some German dyslexic readers. We investigated variations in reading style in an eye-tracking paradigm with German dysfluent 3rd and 4th graders. Twenty-six TypFix-readers (fixation counts within the range of 47 age-matched typical readers) were compared with 42 HighFix-readers (increased fixation counts). Both groups showed lexical access: Words were read more efficiently than nonwords and pseudohomophones. TypFix-readers showed stronger reliance on lexical reading than HighFix-readers (smaller length effects for number of fixations and total reading time, stronger lexicality effects for gaze duration, stronger word-pseudohomophone effects for mean saccade amplitude). We conclude that in both groups, sublexical and lexical reading processes were impaired due to inefficient visual-verbal integration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5714164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57141642017-12-14 Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German Gangl, Melanie Moll, Kristina Jones, Manon W. Banfi, Chiara Schulte-Körne, Gerd Landerl, Karin Sci Stud Read Original Articles Dyslexia in consistent orthographies like German is characterized by dysfluent reading, which is often assumed to result from failure to build up an orthographic lexicon and overreliance on decoding. However, earlier evidence indicates effects of lexical processing at least in some German dyslexic readers. We investigated variations in reading style in an eye-tracking paradigm with German dysfluent 3rd and 4th graders. Twenty-six TypFix-readers (fixation counts within the range of 47 age-matched typical readers) were compared with 42 HighFix-readers (increased fixation counts). Both groups showed lexical access: Words were read more efficiently than nonwords and pseudohomophones. TypFix-readers showed stronger reliance on lexical reading than HighFix-readers (smaller length effects for number of fixations and total reading time, stronger lexicality effects for gaze duration, stronger word-pseudohomophone effects for mean saccade amplitude). We conclude that in both groups, sublexical and lexical reading processes were impaired due to inefficient visual-verbal integration. Routledge 2017-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5714164/ /pubmed/29249911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1339709 Text en Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gangl, Melanie
Moll, Kristina
Jones, Manon W.
Banfi, Chiara
Schulte-Körne, Gerd
Landerl, Karin
Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German
title Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German
title_full Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German
title_fullStr Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German
title_full_unstemmed Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German
title_short Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German
title_sort lexical reading in dysfluent readers of german
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29249911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1339709
work_keys_str_mv AT ganglmelanie lexicalreadingindysfluentreadersofgerman
AT mollkristina lexicalreadingindysfluentreadersofgerman
AT jonesmanonw lexicalreadingindysfluentreadersofgerman
AT banfichiara lexicalreadingindysfluentreadersofgerman
AT schultekornegerd lexicalreadingindysfluentreadersofgerman
AT landerlkarin lexicalreadingindysfluentreadersofgerman