Cargando…

Genomic Environment Impacts Color Vision Evolution in a Family with Visually Based Sexual Selection

Many models of evolution by sexual selection predict a coevolution of sensory systems and mate preferences, but the genomic architecture (number and arrangement of contributing loci) underlying these characters could constrain this coevolution. Here, we examine how the genomic organization and evolu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandkam, Benjamin A, Joy, Jeffrey B, Watson, Corey T, Breden, Felix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29121209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evx228
_version_ 1783283537257955328
author Sandkam, Benjamin A
Joy, Jeffrey B
Watson, Corey T
Breden, Felix
author_facet Sandkam, Benjamin A
Joy, Jeffrey B
Watson, Corey T
Breden, Felix
author_sort Sandkam, Benjamin A
collection PubMed
description Many models of evolution by sexual selection predict a coevolution of sensory systems and mate preferences, but the genomic architecture (number and arrangement of contributing loci) underlying these characters could constrain this coevolution. Here, we examine how the genomic organization and evolution of the opsin genes (responsible for tuning color vision) can influence the evolutionary trajectory of sexually selected traits across 15 species in the family Poeciliidae, which includes classic systems for studies of color-mediated sexual selection such as guppies, swordtails, and mollies. Although male coloration patterns and the importance of this coloration in female mate choice vary widely within and among genera, sequencing revealed low variability at amino acid sites that tune Long Wavelength-Sensitive (LWS) opsins in this speciose family. Although most opsin genes in these species appear to have evolved along traditional mutation-selection dynamics, we identified high rates of gene conversion between two of the LWS loci (LWS-1 and LWS-3), likely due to the inverted tandem repeat nature of these genes. Yet members of the subgenus Lebistes appear to resist LWS gene conversion. The LWS opsins are responsible for detecting and discriminating red and orange coloration—a key sexually selected trait in members of the subgenus Lebistes. Taken together these results suggest selection is acting against the homogenizing effects of gene conversion to maintain LWS-1/LWS-3 differences within this subgenus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5714168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57141682017-12-08 Genomic Environment Impacts Color Vision Evolution in a Family with Visually Based Sexual Selection Sandkam, Benjamin A Joy, Jeffrey B Watson, Corey T Breden, Felix Genome Biol Evol Letter Many models of evolution by sexual selection predict a coevolution of sensory systems and mate preferences, but the genomic architecture (number and arrangement of contributing loci) underlying these characters could constrain this coevolution. Here, we examine how the genomic organization and evolution of the opsin genes (responsible for tuning color vision) can influence the evolutionary trajectory of sexually selected traits across 15 species in the family Poeciliidae, which includes classic systems for studies of color-mediated sexual selection such as guppies, swordtails, and mollies. Although male coloration patterns and the importance of this coloration in female mate choice vary widely within and among genera, sequencing revealed low variability at amino acid sites that tune Long Wavelength-Sensitive (LWS) opsins in this speciose family. Although most opsin genes in these species appear to have evolved along traditional mutation-selection dynamics, we identified high rates of gene conversion between two of the LWS loci (LWS-1 and LWS-3), likely due to the inverted tandem repeat nature of these genes. Yet members of the subgenus Lebistes appear to resist LWS gene conversion. The LWS opsins are responsible for detecting and discriminating red and orange coloration—a key sexually selected trait in members of the subgenus Lebistes. Taken together these results suggest selection is acting against the homogenizing effects of gene conversion to maintain LWS-1/LWS-3 differences within this subgenus. Oxford University Press 2017-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5714168/ /pubmed/29121209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evx228 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Letter
Sandkam, Benjamin A
Joy, Jeffrey B
Watson, Corey T
Breden, Felix
Genomic Environment Impacts Color Vision Evolution in a Family with Visually Based Sexual Selection
title Genomic Environment Impacts Color Vision Evolution in a Family with Visually Based Sexual Selection
title_full Genomic Environment Impacts Color Vision Evolution in a Family with Visually Based Sexual Selection
title_fullStr Genomic Environment Impacts Color Vision Evolution in a Family with Visually Based Sexual Selection
title_full_unstemmed Genomic Environment Impacts Color Vision Evolution in a Family with Visually Based Sexual Selection
title_short Genomic Environment Impacts Color Vision Evolution in a Family with Visually Based Sexual Selection
title_sort genomic environment impacts color vision evolution in a family with visually based sexual selection
topic Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29121209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evx228
work_keys_str_mv AT sandkambenjamina genomicenvironmentimpactscolorvisionevolutioninafamilywithvisuallybasedsexualselection
AT joyjeffreyb genomicenvironmentimpactscolorvisionevolutioninafamilywithvisuallybasedsexualselection
AT watsoncoreyt genomicenvironmentimpactscolorvisionevolutioninafamilywithvisuallybasedsexualselection
AT bredenfelix genomicenvironmentimpactscolorvisionevolutioninafamilywithvisuallybasedsexualselection