Cargando…

Coronary calcium quantification using contrast‐enhanced dual‐energy computed tomography scans

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a direct measure of calcium burden by using dual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) during contrast‐enhanced coronary imaging, potentially eliminating the need for an extra noncontrast X‐ray acquisition. The ambiguity of separation of calcium from contrast mat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamak, Didem, Pavlicek, William, Boltz, Thomas, Panse, Prasad M., Akay, Metin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23652239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i3.4014
_version_ 1783283586471821312
author Yamak, Didem
Pavlicek, William
Boltz, Thomas
Panse, Prasad M.
Akay, Metin
author_facet Yamak, Didem
Pavlicek, William
Boltz, Thomas
Panse, Prasad M.
Akay, Metin
author_sort Yamak, Didem
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to evaluate a direct measure of calcium burden by using dual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) during contrast‐enhanced coronary imaging, potentially eliminating the need for an extra noncontrast X‐ray acquisition. The ambiguity of separation of calcium from contrast material on contrast‐enhanced images was solved by using virtual noncontrast images obtained by DECT. A new threshold CT number was required to detect the calcium carrying potential risk for adverse coronary events on virtual noncontrast images. Two methods were investigated to determine the 130 HU threshold for DECT scoring. An in vitro anthropomorphic phantom with 29 excised patient calcium plaques inserted was used for both a linear and a logistic regression analysis. An IRB approved in vivo prospective study of six patients was also performed to be used for logistic regression analysis. The threshold found by logistic regression model to define the calcium burden on virtual noncontrast images detects the calcium carrying potential risk for adverse coronary events correctly (2.45% error rate). DECT calcium mass and volume scores obtained by using the threshold correlates with both conventional Agatston and volume scores [Formula: see text]. A conventional CT cardiac exam requires two scans, including a noncontrast scan for calcium quantification and a contrast‐enhanced scan for coronary angiography. With the ability to quantify calcium on DECT contrast‐enhanced images, a DECT cardiac exam could be accomplished with one contrast‐enhanced scan for both calcium quantification and coronary angiography. PACS numbers: 87.57.Q, 87.57.N
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5714428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57144282018-04-02 Coronary calcium quantification using contrast‐enhanced dual‐energy computed tomography scans Yamak, Didem Pavlicek, William Boltz, Thomas Panse, Prasad M. Akay, Metin J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging The purpose of this study is to evaluate a direct measure of calcium burden by using dual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) during contrast‐enhanced coronary imaging, potentially eliminating the need for an extra noncontrast X‐ray acquisition. The ambiguity of separation of calcium from contrast material on contrast‐enhanced images was solved by using virtual noncontrast images obtained by DECT. A new threshold CT number was required to detect the calcium carrying potential risk for adverse coronary events on virtual noncontrast images. Two methods were investigated to determine the 130 HU threshold for DECT scoring. An in vitro anthropomorphic phantom with 29 excised patient calcium plaques inserted was used for both a linear and a logistic regression analysis. An IRB approved in vivo prospective study of six patients was also performed to be used for logistic regression analysis. The threshold found by logistic regression model to define the calcium burden on virtual noncontrast images detects the calcium carrying potential risk for adverse coronary events correctly (2.45% error rate). DECT calcium mass and volume scores obtained by using the threshold correlates with both conventional Agatston and volume scores [Formula: see text]. A conventional CT cardiac exam requires two scans, including a noncontrast scan for calcium quantification and a contrast‐enhanced scan for coronary angiography. With the ability to quantify calcium on DECT contrast‐enhanced images, a DECT cardiac exam could be accomplished with one contrast‐enhanced scan for both calcium quantification and coronary angiography. PACS numbers: 87.57.Q, 87.57.N John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5714428/ /pubmed/23652239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i3.4014 Text en © 2013 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Yamak, Didem
Pavlicek, William
Boltz, Thomas
Panse, Prasad M.
Akay, Metin
Coronary calcium quantification using contrast‐enhanced dual‐energy computed tomography scans
title Coronary calcium quantification using contrast‐enhanced dual‐energy computed tomography scans
title_full Coronary calcium quantification using contrast‐enhanced dual‐energy computed tomography scans
title_fullStr Coronary calcium quantification using contrast‐enhanced dual‐energy computed tomography scans
title_full_unstemmed Coronary calcium quantification using contrast‐enhanced dual‐energy computed tomography scans
title_short Coronary calcium quantification using contrast‐enhanced dual‐energy computed tomography scans
title_sort coronary calcium quantification using contrast‐enhanced dual‐energy computed tomography scans
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23652239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i3.4014
work_keys_str_mv AT yamakdidem coronarycalciumquantificationusingcontrastenhanceddualenergycomputedtomographyscans
AT pavlicekwilliam coronarycalciumquantificationusingcontrastenhanceddualenergycomputedtomographyscans
AT boltzthomas coronarycalciumquantificationusingcontrastenhanceddualenergycomputedtomographyscans
AT panseprasadm coronarycalciumquantificationusingcontrastenhanceddualenergycomputedtomographyscans
AT akaymetin coronarycalciumquantificationusingcontrastenhanceddualenergycomputedtomographyscans