Cargando…
Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer
It is the purpose of this study to evaluate how self‐expanding stents (SESs) affect esophageal cancer radiation planning target volumes (PTVs) and dose delivered to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Ten patients were evaluated, for whom a SES was placed before radiation. A computed tomography (CT)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23835387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i4.4218 |
_version_ | 1783283599872622592 |
---|---|
author | Francis, Samual R. Anker, Christopher J. Wang, Brian Williams, Greg V. Cox, Kristen Adler, Douglas G. Shrieve, Dennis C. Salter, Bill J. |
author_facet | Francis, Samual R. Anker, Christopher J. Wang, Brian Williams, Greg V. Cox, Kristen Adler, Douglas G. Shrieve, Dennis C. Salter, Bill J. |
author_sort | Francis, Samual R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is the purpose of this study to evaluate how self‐expanding stents (SESs) affect esophageal cancer radiation planning target volumes (PTVs) and dose delivered to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Ten patients were evaluated, for whom a SES was placed before radiation. A computed tomography (CT) scan obtained before stent placement was fused to the post‐stent CT simulation scan. Three methods were used to represent pre‐stent PTVs: 1) image fusion (IF), 2) volume approximation (VA), and 3) diameter approximation (DA). PTVs and OARs were contoured per RTOG 1010 protocol using Eclipse Treatment Planning software. Post‐stent dosimetry for each patient was compared to approximated pre‐stent dosimetry. For each of the three pre‐stent approximations (IF, VA, and DA), the mean lung and liver doses and the estimated percentages of lung volumes receiving 5 Gy, 10 Gy, 20 Gy, and 30 Gy, and heart volumes receiving 40 Gy were significantly lower (p‐values [Formula: see text]) than those estimated in the post‐stent treatment plans. The lung V5, lung V10, and heart V40 constraints were achieved more often using our pre‐stent approximations. Esophageal SES placement increases the dose delivered to the lungs, heart, and liver. This may have clinical importance, especially when the dose‐volume constraints are near the recommended thresholds, as was the case for lung V5, lung V10, and heart V40. While stents have established benefits for treating patients with significant dysphagia, physicians considering stent placement and radiation therapy must realize the effects stents can have on the dosimetry. PACS number: 87.55.dk |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5714531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57145312018-04-02 Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer Francis, Samual R. Anker, Christopher J. Wang, Brian Williams, Greg V. Cox, Kristen Adler, Douglas G. Shrieve, Dennis C. Salter, Bill J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics It is the purpose of this study to evaluate how self‐expanding stents (SESs) affect esophageal cancer radiation planning target volumes (PTVs) and dose delivered to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Ten patients were evaluated, for whom a SES was placed before radiation. A computed tomography (CT) scan obtained before stent placement was fused to the post‐stent CT simulation scan. Three methods were used to represent pre‐stent PTVs: 1) image fusion (IF), 2) volume approximation (VA), and 3) diameter approximation (DA). PTVs and OARs were contoured per RTOG 1010 protocol using Eclipse Treatment Planning software. Post‐stent dosimetry for each patient was compared to approximated pre‐stent dosimetry. For each of the three pre‐stent approximations (IF, VA, and DA), the mean lung and liver doses and the estimated percentages of lung volumes receiving 5 Gy, 10 Gy, 20 Gy, and 30 Gy, and heart volumes receiving 40 Gy were significantly lower (p‐values [Formula: see text]) than those estimated in the post‐stent treatment plans. The lung V5, lung V10, and heart V40 constraints were achieved more often using our pre‐stent approximations. Esophageal SES placement increases the dose delivered to the lungs, heart, and liver. This may have clinical importance, especially when the dose‐volume constraints are near the recommended thresholds, as was the case for lung V5, lung V10, and heart V40. While stents have established benefits for treating patients with significant dysphagia, physicians considering stent placement and radiation therapy must realize the effects stents can have on the dosimetry. PACS number: 87.55.dk John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5714531/ /pubmed/23835387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i4.4218 Text en © 2013 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Francis, Samual R. Anker, Christopher J. Wang, Brian Williams, Greg V. Cox, Kristen Adler, Douglas G. Shrieve, Dennis C. Salter, Bill J. Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer |
title | Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer |
title_full | Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer |
title_fullStr | Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer |
title_short | Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer |
title_sort | self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23835387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i4.4218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT francissamualr selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer AT ankerchristopherj selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer AT wangbrian selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer AT williamsgregv selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer AT coxkristen selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer AT adlerdouglasg selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer AT shrievedennisc selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer AT salterbillj selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer |