Cargando…

Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer

It is the purpose of this study to evaluate how self‐expanding stents (SESs) affect esophageal cancer radiation planning target volumes (PTVs) and dose delivered to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Ten patients were evaluated, for whom a SES was placed before radiation. A computed tomography (CT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Francis, Samual R., Anker, Christopher J., Wang, Brian, Williams, Greg V., Cox, Kristen, Adler, Douglas G., Shrieve, Dennis C., Salter, Bill J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23835387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i4.4218
_version_ 1783283599872622592
author Francis, Samual R.
Anker, Christopher J.
Wang, Brian
Williams, Greg V.
Cox, Kristen
Adler, Douglas G.
Shrieve, Dennis C.
Salter, Bill J.
author_facet Francis, Samual R.
Anker, Christopher J.
Wang, Brian
Williams, Greg V.
Cox, Kristen
Adler, Douglas G.
Shrieve, Dennis C.
Salter, Bill J.
author_sort Francis, Samual R.
collection PubMed
description It is the purpose of this study to evaluate how self‐expanding stents (SESs) affect esophageal cancer radiation planning target volumes (PTVs) and dose delivered to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Ten patients were evaluated, for whom a SES was placed before radiation. A computed tomography (CT) scan obtained before stent placement was fused to the post‐stent CT simulation scan. Three methods were used to represent pre‐stent PTVs: 1) image fusion (IF), 2) volume approximation (VA), and 3) diameter approximation (DA). PTVs and OARs were contoured per RTOG 1010 protocol using Eclipse Treatment Planning software. Post‐stent dosimetry for each patient was compared to approximated pre‐stent dosimetry. For each of the three pre‐stent approximations (IF, VA, and DA), the mean lung and liver doses and the estimated percentages of lung volumes receiving 5 Gy, 10 Gy, 20 Gy, and 30 Gy, and heart volumes receiving 40 Gy were significantly lower (p‐values [Formula: see text]) than those estimated in the post‐stent treatment plans. The lung V5, lung V10, and heart V40 constraints were achieved more often using our pre‐stent approximations. Esophageal SES placement increases the dose delivered to the lungs, heart, and liver. This may have clinical importance, especially when the dose‐volume constraints are near the recommended thresholds, as was the case for lung V5, lung V10, and heart V40. While stents have established benefits for treating patients with significant dysphagia, physicians considering stent placement and radiation therapy must realize the effects stents can have on the dosimetry. PACS number: 87.55.dk
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5714531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57145312018-04-02 Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer Francis, Samual R. Anker, Christopher J. Wang, Brian Williams, Greg V. Cox, Kristen Adler, Douglas G. Shrieve, Dennis C. Salter, Bill J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics It is the purpose of this study to evaluate how self‐expanding stents (SESs) affect esophageal cancer radiation planning target volumes (PTVs) and dose delivered to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Ten patients were evaluated, for whom a SES was placed before radiation. A computed tomography (CT) scan obtained before stent placement was fused to the post‐stent CT simulation scan. Three methods were used to represent pre‐stent PTVs: 1) image fusion (IF), 2) volume approximation (VA), and 3) diameter approximation (DA). PTVs and OARs were contoured per RTOG 1010 protocol using Eclipse Treatment Planning software. Post‐stent dosimetry for each patient was compared to approximated pre‐stent dosimetry. For each of the three pre‐stent approximations (IF, VA, and DA), the mean lung and liver doses and the estimated percentages of lung volumes receiving 5 Gy, 10 Gy, 20 Gy, and 30 Gy, and heart volumes receiving 40 Gy were significantly lower (p‐values [Formula: see text]) than those estimated in the post‐stent treatment plans. The lung V5, lung V10, and heart V40 constraints were achieved more often using our pre‐stent approximations. Esophageal SES placement increases the dose delivered to the lungs, heart, and liver. This may have clinical importance, especially when the dose‐volume constraints are near the recommended thresholds, as was the case for lung V5, lung V10, and heart V40. While stents have established benefits for treating patients with significant dysphagia, physicians considering stent placement and radiation therapy must realize the effects stents can have on the dosimetry. PACS number: 87.55.dk John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5714531/ /pubmed/23835387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i4.4218 Text en © 2013 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Francis, Samual R.
Anker, Christopher J.
Wang, Brian
Williams, Greg V.
Cox, Kristen
Adler, Douglas G.
Shrieve, Dennis C.
Salter, Bill J.
Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer
title Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer
title_full Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer
title_fullStr Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer
title_short Self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer
title_sort self‐expanding stent effects on radiation dosimetry in esophageal cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23835387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i4.4218
work_keys_str_mv AT francissamualr selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer
AT ankerchristopherj selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer
AT wangbrian selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer
AT williamsgregv selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer
AT coxkristen selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer
AT adlerdouglasg selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer
AT shrievedennisc selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer
AT salterbillj selfexpandingstenteffectsonradiationdosimetryinesophagealcancer