Cargando…

Quantifying variability of intrafractional target motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancers

In lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), variability of intrafractional target motion can negate the potential benefits of four‐dimensional (4D) treatment planning that aims to account for the dosimetric impacts of organ motion. This study used tumor motion data obtained from CyberKnife SBRT t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Mark K.H., Kwong, Dora L.W., Tam, Eric, Tong, Anthony, Ng, Sherry C.Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24036866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4319
_version_ 1783283606664249344
author Chan, Mark K.H.
Kwong, Dora L.W.
Tam, Eric
Tong, Anthony
Ng, Sherry C.Y.
author_facet Chan, Mark K.H.
Kwong, Dora L.W.
Tam, Eric
Tong, Anthony
Ng, Sherry C.Y.
author_sort Chan, Mark K.H.
collection PubMed
description In lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), variability of intrafractional target motion can negate the potential benefits of four‐dimensional (4D) treatment planning that aims to account for the dosimetric impacts of organ motion. This study used tumor motion data obtained from CyberKnife SBRT treatments to quantify the reproducibility of probability motion function (pmf) of 37 lung tumors. The reproducibility of pmf was analyzed with and without subtracting the intrafractional baseline drift from the original motion data. Statistics of intrafractional tumor motion including baseline drift, target motion amplitude and period, were also calculated. The target motion amplitude significantly correlates with variations (1 SD) of motion amplitude and baseline drift. Significant correlation between treatment time and variations (1 SD) of motion amplitude was observed in anterior‐posterior (AP) motion, but not in craniocaudal (CC) and left‐right (LR) motion. The magnitude of AP and LR baseline drifts significantly depend on the treatment time, while the CC baseline drift does not. The reproducibility of pmf as a function of time can be well described by a two‐exponential function with a fast and slow component. The reproducibility of pmf is over 60% for the CC motion and over 50% for the AP and LR motions when baseline variations were subtracted from the original motion data. It decreases to just over 30% for the CC motion and about 20% for the AP and LR motion, otherwise. 4D planning has obvious limitations due to variability of intrafractional target motion. To account for potential risks of overdosing critical organs, it is important to simulate the dosimetric impacts of intra‐ and interfractional baseline drift using population statistics obtained from SBRT treatments. PACS number: 87.55.‐x
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5714563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57145632018-04-02 Quantifying variability of intrafractional target motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancers Chan, Mark K.H. Kwong, Dora L.W. Tam, Eric Tong, Anthony Ng, Sherry C.Y. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics In lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), variability of intrafractional target motion can negate the potential benefits of four‐dimensional (4D) treatment planning that aims to account for the dosimetric impacts of organ motion. This study used tumor motion data obtained from CyberKnife SBRT treatments to quantify the reproducibility of probability motion function (pmf) of 37 lung tumors. The reproducibility of pmf was analyzed with and without subtracting the intrafractional baseline drift from the original motion data. Statistics of intrafractional tumor motion including baseline drift, target motion amplitude and period, were also calculated. The target motion amplitude significantly correlates with variations (1 SD) of motion amplitude and baseline drift. Significant correlation between treatment time and variations (1 SD) of motion amplitude was observed in anterior‐posterior (AP) motion, but not in craniocaudal (CC) and left‐right (LR) motion. The magnitude of AP and LR baseline drifts significantly depend on the treatment time, while the CC baseline drift does not. The reproducibility of pmf as a function of time can be well described by a two‐exponential function with a fast and slow component. The reproducibility of pmf is over 60% for the CC motion and over 50% for the AP and LR motions when baseline variations were subtracted from the original motion data. It decreases to just over 30% for the CC motion and about 20% for the AP and LR motion, otherwise. 4D planning has obvious limitations due to variability of intrafractional target motion. To account for potential risks of overdosing critical organs, it is important to simulate the dosimetric impacts of intra‐ and interfractional baseline drift using population statistics obtained from SBRT treatments. PACS number: 87.55.‐x John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5714563/ /pubmed/24036866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4319 Text en © 2013 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Chan, Mark K.H.
Kwong, Dora L.W.
Tam, Eric
Tong, Anthony
Ng, Sherry C.Y.
Quantifying variability of intrafractional target motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancers
title Quantifying variability of intrafractional target motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancers
title_full Quantifying variability of intrafractional target motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancers
title_fullStr Quantifying variability of intrafractional target motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancers
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying variability of intrafractional target motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancers
title_short Quantifying variability of intrafractional target motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancers
title_sort quantifying variability of intrafractional target motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancers
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24036866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4319
work_keys_str_mv AT chanmarkkh quantifyingvariabilityofintrafractionaltargetmotioninstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancers
AT kwongdoralw quantifyingvariabilityofintrafractionaltargetmotioninstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancers
AT tameric quantifyingvariabilityofintrafractionaltargetmotioninstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancers
AT tonganthony quantifyingvariabilityofintrafractionaltargetmotioninstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancers
AT ngsherrycy quantifyingvariabilityofintrafractionaltargetmotioninstereotacticbodyradiotherapyforlungcancers