Cargando…
Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of complex markers implanted into lung tumors throughout a course of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Fifteen patients referred for lung SBRT were prospectively included. Radio‐opaque markers were implanted percutaneously, guided by compu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24036871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4337 |
_version_ | 1783283607516741632 |
---|---|
author | Persson, Gitte F. Josipovic, Mirjana von der Recke, Peter Aznar, Marianne C. Juhler‐Nøttrup, Trine Munck af Rosenschöld, Per Korreman, Stine Specht, and Lena |
author_facet | Persson, Gitte F. Josipovic, Mirjana von der Recke, Peter Aznar, Marianne C. Juhler‐Nøttrup, Trine Munck af Rosenschöld, Per Korreman, Stine Specht, and Lena |
author_sort | Persson, Gitte F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of complex markers implanted into lung tumors throughout a course of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Fifteen patients referred for lung SBRT were prospectively included. Radio‐opaque markers were implanted percutaneously, guided by computed tomography (CT). Deep inspiration breath‐hold CT scans (BHCT) were acquired at planning and on three treatment days. The treatment days' BHCTs were registered to the planning BHCT. Intraobserver uncertainty in both tumor and marker registration was determined. Deviations in the difference between tumor and marker‐based image registrations of the BHCT scans during treatment quantified the marker stability. Marker position deviation relative to tumor position of less than 2 mm in all three dimensions was considered acceptable for treatment delivery precision. Intra‐observer uncertainties for image registration in the left‐right (LR), anterior‐posterior (AP), craniocaudal (CC) directions and three‐dimensional vector (3D) were 0.9 mm, 0.9 mm, 1.0 mm, and 1.1 mm (SD) for tumor registration and 0.3 mm, 0. 5 mm, 0.7 mm, and 0.7 mm (SD) for marker registration. Mean 3D differences for tumor registrations on all days were significantly larger than for 3D marker registrations [Formula: see text]. Overall median differences between tumor and marker position were 0.0 mm (range ‐2.9 to 2.6 mm) in LR, 0.0 mm (‐1.8 to 1.5 mm) in AP, and ‐0.2 mm (‐2.6 to 2.8 mm) in CC directions. Four patients had deviations exceeding 2 mm in one or more registrations throughout the SBRT course. This is the first study to evaluate stability of complex markers implanted percutaneously into lung tumors for image guidance in SBRT. We conclude that the observed stability of marker position within the tumor indicates that complex markers can be used as surrogates for tumor position during a short course of SBRT as long as the uncertainties related to their position within the tumor are incorporated into the planning target volume. PACS number: 87.57.nj, 87.55.ne |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5714566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57145662018-04-02 Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy Persson, Gitte F. Josipovic, Mirjana von der Recke, Peter Aznar, Marianne C. Juhler‐Nøttrup, Trine Munck af Rosenschöld, Per Korreman, Stine Specht, and Lena J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of complex markers implanted into lung tumors throughout a course of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Fifteen patients referred for lung SBRT were prospectively included. Radio‐opaque markers were implanted percutaneously, guided by computed tomography (CT). Deep inspiration breath‐hold CT scans (BHCT) were acquired at planning and on three treatment days. The treatment days' BHCTs were registered to the planning BHCT. Intraobserver uncertainty in both tumor and marker registration was determined. Deviations in the difference between tumor and marker‐based image registrations of the BHCT scans during treatment quantified the marker stability. Marker position deviation relative to tumor position of less than 2 mm in all three dimensions was considered acceptable for treatment delivery precision. Intra‐observer uncertainties for image registration in the left‐right (LR), anterior‐posterior (AP), craniocaudal (CC) directions and three‐dimensional vector (3D) were 0.9 mm, 0.9 mm, 1.0 mm, and 1.1 mm (SD) for tumor registration and 0.3 mm, 0. 5 mm, 0.7 mm, and 0.7 mm (SD) for marker registration. Mean 3D differences for tumor registrations on all days were significantly larger than for 3D marker registrations [Formula: see text]. Overall median differences between tumor and marker position were 0.0 mm (range ‐2.9 to 2.6 mm) in LR, 0.0 mm (‐1.8 to 1.5 mm) in AP, and ‐0.2 mm (‐2.6 to 2.8 mm) in CC directions. Four patients had deviations exceeding 2 mm in one or more registrations throughout the SBRT course. This is the first study to evaluate stability of complex markers implanted percutaneously into lung tumors for image guidance in SBRT. We conclude that the observed stability of marker position within the tumor indicates that complex markers can be used as surrogates for tumor position during a short course of SBRT as long as the uncertainties related to their position within the tumor are incorporated into the planning target volume. PACS number: 87.57.nj, 87.55.ne John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5714566/ /pubmed/24036871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4337 Text en © 2013 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Persson, Gitte F. Josipovic, Mirjana von der Recke, Peter Aznar, Marianne C. Juhler‐Nøttrup, Trine Munck af Rosenschöld, Per Korreman, Stine Specht, and Lena Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy |
title | Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy |
title_full | Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy |
title_short | Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy |
title_sort | stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24036871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perssongittef stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy AT josipovicmirjana stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy AT vonderreckepeter stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy AT aznarmariannec stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy AT juhlernøttruptrine stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy AT munckafrosenscholdper stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy AT korremanstine stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy AT spechtandlena stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy |