Cargando…

Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of complex markers implanted into lung tumors throughout a course of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Fifteen patients referred for lung SBRT were prospectively included. Radio‐opaque markers were implanted percutaneously, guided by compu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Persson, Gitte F., Josipovic, Mirjana, von der Recke, Peter, Aznar, Marianne C., Juhler‐Nøttrup, Trine, Munck af Rosenschöld, Per, Korreman, Stine, Specht, and Lena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24036871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4337
_version_ 1783283607516741632
author Persson, Gitte F.
Josipovic, Mirjana
von der Recke, Peter
Aznar, Marianne C.
Juhler‐Nøttrup, Trine
Munck af Rosenschöld, Per
Korreman, Stine
Specht, and Lena
author_facet Persson, Gitte F.
Josipovic, Mirjana
von der Recke, Peter
Aznar, Marianne C.
Juhler‐Nøttrup, Trine
Munck af Rosenschöld, Per
Korreman, Stine
Specht, and Lena
author_sort Persson, Gitte F.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of complex markers implanted into lung tumors throughout a course of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Fifteen patients referred for lung SBRT were prospectively included. Radio‐opaque markers were implanted percutaneously, guided by computed tomography (CT). Deep inspiration breath‐hold CT scans (BHCT) were acquired at planning and on three treatment days. The treatment days' BHCTs were registered to the planning BHCT. Intraobserver uncertainty in both tumor and marker registration was determined. Deviations in the difference between tumor and marker‐based image registrations of the BHCT scans during treatment quantified the marker stability. Marker position deviation relative to tumor position of less than 2 mm in all three dimensions was considered acceptable for treatment delivery precision. Intra‐observer uncertainties for image registration in the left‐right (LR), anterior‐posterior (AP), craniocaudal (CC) directions and three‐dimensional vector (3D) were 0.9 mm, 0.9 mm, 1.0 mm, and 1.1 mm (SD) for tumor registration and 0.3 mm, 0. 5 mm, 0.7 mm, and 0.7 mm (SD) for marker registration. Mean 3D differences for tumor registrations on all days were significantly larger than for 3D marker registrations [Formula: see text]. Overall median differences between tumor and marker position were 0.0 mm (range ‐2.9 to 2.6 mm) in LR, 0.0 mm (‐1.8 to 1.5 mm) in AP, and ‐0.2 mm (‐2.6 to 2.8 mm) in CC directions. Four patients had deviations exceeding 2 mm in one or more registrations throughout the SBRT course. This is the first study to evaluate stability of complex markers implanted percutaneously into lung tumors for image guidance in SBRT. We conclude that the observed stability of marker position within the tumor indicates that complex markers can be used as surrogates for tumor position during a short course of SBRT as long as the uncertainties related to their position within the tumor are incorporated into the planning target volume. PACS number: 87.57.nj, 87.55.ne
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5714566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57145662018-04-02 Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy Persson, Gitte F. Josipovic, Mirjana von der Recke, Peter Aznar, Marianne C. Juhler‐Nøttrup, Trine Munck af Rosenschöld, Per Korreman, Stine Specht, and Lena J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of complex markers implanted into lung tumors throughout a course of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Fifteen patients referred for lung SBRT were prospectively included. Radio‐opaque markers were implanted percutaneously, guided by computed tomography (CT). Deep inspiration breath‐hold CT scans (BHCT) were acquired at planning and on three treatment days. The treatment days' BHCTs were registered to the planning BHCT. Intraobserver uncertainty in both tumor and marker registration was determined. Deviations in the difference between tumor and marker‐based image registrations of the BHCT scans during treatment quantified the marker stability. Marker position deviation relative to tumor position of less than 2 mm in all three dimensions was considered acceptable for treatment delivery precision. Intra‐observer uncertainties for image registration in the left‐right (LR), anterior‐posterior (AP), craniocaudal (CC) directions and three‐dimensional vector (3D) were 0.9 mm, 0.9 mm, 1.0 mm, and 1.1 mm (SD) for tumor registration and 0.3 mm, 0. 5 mm, 0.7 mm, and 0.7 mm (SD) for marker registration. Mean 3D differences for tumor registrations on all days were significantly larger than for 3D marker registrations [Formula: see text]. Overall median differences between tumor and marker position were 0.0 mm (range ‐2.9 to 2.6 mm) in LR, 0.0 mm (‐1.8 to 1.5 mm) in AP, and ‐0.2 mm (‐2.6 to 2.8 mm) in CC directions. Four patients had deviations exceeding 2 mm in one or more registrations throughout the SBRT course. This is the first study to evaluate stability of complex markers implanted percutaneously into lung tumors for image guidance in SBRT. We conclude that the observed stability of marker position within the tumor indicates that complex markers can be used as surrogates for tumor position during a short course of SBRT as long as the uncertainties related to their position within the tumor are incorporated into the planning target volume. PACS number: 87.57.nj, 87.55.ne John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5714566/ /pubmed/24036871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4337 Text en © 2013 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Persson, Gitte F.
Josipovic, Mirjana
von der Recke, Peter
Aznar, Marianne C.
Juhler‐Nøttrup, Trine
Munck af Rosenschöld, Per
Korreman, Stine
Specht, and Lena
Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy
title Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy
title_full Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy
title_fullStr Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy
title_short Stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy
title_sort stability of percutaneously implanted markers for lung stereotactic radiotherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24036871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4337
work_keys_str_mv AT perssongittef stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy
AT josipovicmirjana stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy
AT vonderreckepeter stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy
AT aznarmariannec stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy
AT juhlernøttruptrine stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy
AT munckafrosenscholdper stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy
AT korremanstine stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy
AT spechtandlena stabilityofpercutaneouslyimplantedmarkersforlungstereotacticradiotherapy