Cargando…

Migration from full‐head mask to “open‐face” mask for immobilization of patients with head and neck cancer

To provide an alternative device for immobilization of the head while easing claustrophobia and improving comfort, an “open‐face” thermoplastic mask was evaluated using video‐based optical surface imaging (OSI) and kilovoltage (kV) X‐ray radiography. A three‐point thermoplastic head mask with a prec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Guang, Lovelock, D. Michael, Mechalakos, James, Rao, Shyam, Della‐Biancia, Cesar, Amols, Howard, Lee, Nancy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24036878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4400
_version_ 1783283608863113216
author Li, Guang
Lovelock, D. Michael
Mechalakos, James
Rao, Shyam
Della‐Biancia, Cesar
Amols, Howard
Lee, Nancy
author_facet Li, Guang
Lovelock, D. Michael
Mechalakos, James
Rao, Shyam
Della‐Biancia, Cesar
Amols, Howard
Lee, Nancy
author_sort Li, Guang
collection PubMed
description To provide an alternative device for immobilization of the head while easing claustrophobia and improving comfort, an “open‐face” thermoplastic mask was evaluated using video‐based optical surface imaging (OSI) and kilovoltage (kV) X‐ray radiography. A three‐point thermoplastic head mask with a precut opening and reinforced strips was developed. After molding, it provided sufficient visible facial area as the region of interest for OSI. Using real‐time OSI, the head motion of ten volunteers in the new mask was evaluated during mask locking and 15 minutes lying on the treatment couch. Using a nose mark with reference to room lasers, forced head movement in open‐face and full‐head masks (with a nose hole) was compared. Five patients with claustrophobia were immobilized with open‐face masks, set up using OSI and kV, and treated in 121 fractions, in which 61 fractions were monitored during treatment using real‐time OSI. With the open‐face mask, head motion was found to be [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in volunteers during the experiment, and [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in patients during treatment. These agree with patient motion calculated from pre‐/post‐treatment OSI and kV data using different anatomical landmarks. In volunteers, the head shift induced by mask‐locking was [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , and the range of forced movements in the open‐face and full‐head masks were found to be similar. Most (80%) of the volunteers preferred the open‐face mask to the full‐head mask, while claustrophobic patients could only tolerate the open‐face mask. The open‐face mask is characterized for its immobilization capability and can immobilize patients sufficiently [Formula: see text] during radiotherapy. It provides a clinical solution to the immobilization of patients with head and neck (HN) cancer undergoing radiotherapy, and is particularly beneficial for claustrophobic patients. This new open‐face mask is readily adopted in radiotherapy clinic as a superior alternative to the standard full‐head mask. PACS numbers: 87.19.xj, 87.63.L‐, 87.59.‐e, 87.55.tg, 87.55.‐x
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5714571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57145712018-04-02 Migration from full‐head mask to “open‐face” mask for immobilization of patients with head and neck cancer Li, Guang Lovelock, D. Michael Mechalakos, James Rao, Shyam Della‐Biancia, Cesar Amols, Howard Lee, Nancy J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics To provide an alternative device for immobilization of the head while easing claustrophobia and improving comfort, an “open‐face” thermoplastic mask was evaluated using video‐based optical surface imaging (OSI) and kilovoltage (kV) X‐ray radiography. A three‐point thermoplastic head mask with a precut opening and reinforced strips was developed. After molding, it provided sufficient visible facial area as the region of interest for OSI. Using real‐time OSI, the head motion of ten volunteers in the new mask was evaluated during mask locking and 15 minutes lying on the treatment couch. Using a nose mark with reference to room lasers, forced head movement in open‐face and full‐head masks (with a nose hole) was compared. Five patients with claustrophobia were immobilized with open‐face masks, set up using OSI and kV, and treated in 121 fractions, in which 61 fractions were monitored during treatment using real‐time OSI. With the open‐face mask, head motion was found to be [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in volunteers during the experiment, and [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in patients during treatment. These agree with patient motion calculated from pre‐/post‐treatment OSI and kV data using different anatomical landmarks. In volunteers, the head shift induced by mask‐locking was [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , and the range of forced movements in the open‐face and full‐head masks were found to be similar. Most (80%) of the volunteers preferred the open‐face mask to the full‐head mask, while claustrophobic patients could only tolerate the open‐face mask. The open‐face mask is characterized for its immobilization capability and can immobilize patients sufficiently [Formula: see text] during radiotherapy. It provides a clinical solution to the immobilization of patients with head and neck (HN) cancer undergoing radiotherapy, and is particularly beneficial for claustrophobic patients. This new open‐face mask is readily adopted in radiotherapy clinic as a superior alternative to the standard full‐head mask. PACS numbers: 87.19.xj, 87.63.L‐, 87.59.‐e, 87.55.tg, 87.55.‐x John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5714571/ /pubmed/24036878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4400 Text en © 2013 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Li, Guang
Lovelock, D. Michael
Mechalakos, James
Rao, Shyam
Della‐Biancia, Cesar
Amols, Howard
Lee, Nancy
Migration from full‐head mask to “open‐face” mask for immobilization of patients with head and neck cancer
title Migration from full‐head mask to “open‐face” mask for immobilization of patients with head and neck cancer
title_full Migration from full‐head mask to “open‐face” mask for immobilization of patients with head and neck cancer
title_fullStr Migration from full‐head mask to “open‐face” mask for immobilization of patients with head and neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed Migration from full‐head mask to “open‐face” mask for immobilization of patients with head and neck cancer
title_short Migration from full‐head mask to “open‐face” mask for immobilization of patients with head and neck cancer
title_sort migration from full‐head mask to “open‐face” mask for immobilization of patients with head and neck cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24036878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4400
work_keys_str_mv AT liguang migrationfromfullheadmasktoopenfacemaskforimmobilizationofpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT lovelockdmichael migrationfromfullheadmasktoopenfacemaskforimmobilizationofpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT mechalakosjames migrationfromfullheadmasktoopenfacemaskforimmobilizationofpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT raoshyam migrationfromfullheadmasktoopenfacemaskforimmobilizationofpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT dellabianciacesar migrationfromfullheadmasktoopenfacemaskforimmobilizationofpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT amolshoward migrationfromfullheadmasktoopenfacemaskforimmobilizationofpatientswithheadandneckcancer
AT leenancy migrationfromfullheadmasktoopenfacemaskforimmobilizationofpatientswithheadandneckcancer