Cargando…
Evaluation of the sensitivity of two 3D diode array dosimetry systems to setup error for quality assurance (QA) of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sensitivities of 3D diode arrays to setup error for patient‐specific quality assurance (QA) of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Translational setup errors of [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] mm in the RL, SI, and AP directions and rot...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24036856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.3828 |
_version_ | 1783283610967605248 |
---|---|
author | Li, Guangjun Bai, Sen Chen, Nianyong Henderson, Lansdale Wu, Kui Xiao, Jianghong Zhang, Yingjie Jiang, Qingfeng Jiang, Xiaoqin |
author_facet | Li, Guangjun Bai, Sen Chen, Nianyong Henderson, Lansdale Wu, Kui Xiao, Jianghong Zhang, Yingjie Jiang, Qingfeng Jiang, Xiaoqin |
author_sort | Li, Guangjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sensitivities of 3D diode arrays to setup error for patient‐specific quality assurance (QA) of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Translational setup errors of [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] mm in the RL, SI, and AP directions and rotational setup errors of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in the pitch, roll, and yaw directions were set up in two phantom systems, ArcCHECK and [Formula: see text] , with VMAT plans for 11 patients. Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) followed by automatic correction using a HexaPOD 6D treatment couch ensured the position accuracy. Dose distributions of the two phantoms were compared in order to evaluate the agreement between calculated and measured values by using γ analysis with 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm criteria. To determine the impact on setup error for VMAT QA, we evaluated the sensitivity of results acquired by both 3D diode array systems to setup errors in translation and rotation. For the VMAT QA of all patients, the pass rate with the 3%/3 mm criteria exceeded 95% using either phantom. For setup errors of 3 mm and 2°, respectively, the pass rates with the 3%/3 mm criteria decreased by a maximum of 14.0% and 23.5% using ArcCHECK, and 14.4% and 5.0% using [Formula: see text]. Both systems are sensitive to setup error, and do not have mechanisms to account for setup errors in the software. The sensitivity of both VMAT QA systems was strongly dependent on the patient‐specific plan. The sensitivity of ArcCHECK to the rotational error was higher than that of [Formula: see text]. In order to achieve less than 3% mean pass rate reduction of VMAT plan QA with the 3%/3 mm criteria, a setup accuracy of 2 mm/1° and 2 mm/2° is required for ArcCheck and [Formula: see text] devices, respectively. The cumulative effect of the combined 2 mm translational and 1° rotational errors caused 3.8% and 2.4% mean pass rates reduction with 3%/3 mm criteria, respectively, for ArcCHECK and [Formula: see text] systems. For QA of VMAT plans for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) using the ArcCHECK system, the setup should be more accurate. PACS numbers: 87.55.ne, 87.55.Qr, 87.55.km |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5714579 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57145792018-04-02 Evaluation of the sensitivity of two 3D diode array dosimetry systems to setup error for quality assurance (QA) of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) Li, Guangjun Bai, Sen Chen, Nianyong Henderson, Lansdale Wu, Kui Xiao, Jianghong Zhang, Yingjie Jiang, Qingfeng Jiang, Xiaoqin J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sensitivities of 3D diode arrays to setup error for patient‐specific quality assurance (QA) of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Translational setup errors of [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] mm in the RL, SI, and AP directions and rotational setup errors of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in the pitch, roll, and yaw directions were set up in two phantom systems, ArcCHECK and [Formula: see text] , with VMAT plans for 11 patients. Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) followed by automatic correction using a HexaPOD 6D treatment couch ensured the position accuracy. Dose distributions of the two phantoms were compared in order to evaluate the agreement between calculated and measured values by using γ analysis with 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm criteria. To determine the impact on setup error for VMAT QA, we evaluated the sensitivity of results acquired by both 3D diode array systems to setup errors in translation and rotation. For the VMAT QA of all patients, the pass rate with the 3%/3 mm criteria exceeded 95% using either phantom. For setup errors of 3 mm and 2°, respectively, the pass rates with the 3%/3 mm criteria decreased by a maximum of 14.0% and 23.5% using ArcCHECK, and 14.4% and 5.0% using [Formula: see text]. Both systems are sensitive to setup error, and do not have mechanisms to account for setup errors in the software. The sensitivity of both VMAT QA systems was strongly dependent on the patient‐specific plan. The sensitivity of ArcCHECK to the rotational error was higher than that of [Formula: see text]. In order to achieve less than 3% mean pass rate reduction of VMAT plan QA with the 3%/3 mm criteria, a setup accuracy of 2 mm/1° and 2 mm/2° is required for ArcCheck and [Formula: see text] devices, respectively. The cumulative effect of the combined 2 mm translational and 1° rotational errors caused 3.8% and 2.4% mean pass rates reduction with 3%/3 mm criteria, respectively, for ArcCHECK and [Formula: see text] systems. For QA of VMAT plans for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) using the ArcCHECK system, the setup should be more accurate. PACS numbers: 87.55.ne, 87.55.Qr, 87.55.km John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5714579/ /pubmed/24036856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.3828 Text en © 2013 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Li, Guangjun Bai, Sen Chen, Nianyong Henderson, Lansdale Wu, Kui Xiao, Jianghong Zhang, Yingjie Jiang, Qingfeng Jiang, Xiaoqin Evaluation of the sensitivity of two 3D diode array dosimetry systems to setup error for quality assurance (QA) of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) |
title | Evaluation of the sensitivity of two 3D diode array dosimetry systems to setup error for quality assurance (QA) of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) |
title_full | Evaluation of the sensitivity of two 3D diode array dosimetry systems to setup error for quality assurance (QA) of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the sensitivity of two 3D diode array dosimetry systems to setup error for quality assurance (QA) of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the sensitivity of two 3D diode array dosimetry systems to setup error for quality assurance (QA) of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) |
title_short | Evaluation of the sensitivity of two 3D diode array dosimetry systems to setup error for quality assurance (QA) of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) |
title_sort | evaluation of the sensitivity of two 3d diode array dosimetry systems to setup error for quality assurance (qa) of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (vmat) |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24036856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.3828 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liguangjun evaluationofthesensitivityoftwo3ddiodearraydosimetrysystemstosetuperrorforqualityassuranceqaofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat AT baisen evaluationofthesensitivityoftwo3ddiodearraydosimetrysystemstosetuperrorforqualityassuranceqaofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat AT chennianyong evaluationofthesensitivityoftwo3ddiodearraydosimetrysystemstosetuperrorforqualityassuranceqaofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat AT hendersonlansdale evaluationofthesensitivityoftwo3ddiodearraydosimetrysystemstosetuperrorforqualityassuranceqaofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat AT wukui evaluationofthesensitivityoftwo3ddiodearraydosimetrysystemstosetuperrorforqualityassuranceqaofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat AT xiaojianghong evaluationofthesensitivityoftwo3ddiodearraydosimetrysystemstosetuperrorforqualityassuranceqaofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat AT zhangyingjie evaluationofthesensitivityoftwo3ddiodearraydosimetrysystemstosetuperrorforqualityassuranceqaofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat AT jiangqingfeng evaluationofthesensitivityoftwo3ddiodearraydosimetrysystemstosetuperrorforqualityassuranceqaofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat AT jiangxiaoqin evaluationofthesensitivityoftwo3ddiodearraydosimetrysystemstosetuperrorforqualityassuranceqaofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat |