Cargando…

Analytical approach for determining beam profiles in water phantom of symmetric and asymmetric fields of wedged, blocked, and open photon beams

Nowadays, in most radiotherapy departments, the commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) used to calculate dose distributions needs to be verified; therefore, quick, easy‐to‐use, and low‐cost dose distribution algorithms are desirable to test and verify the performance of the TPS. In this paper,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birgani, Mohamad Javad Tahmasebi, Chegeni, Nahid, Arvandi, Shole, Ghalaee, Sasan Razmjoo, Zabihzadeh, Mansoor, Khezerloo, Davood
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24257268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i6.3918
_version_ 1783283623319830528
author Birgani, Mohamad Javad Tahmasebi
Chegeni, Nahid
Arvandi, Shole
Ghalaee, Sasan Razmjoo
Zabihzadeh, Mansoor
Khezerloo, Davood
author_facet Birgani, Mohamad Javad Tahmasebi
Chegeni, Nahid
Arvandi, Shole
Ghalaee, Sasan Razmjoo
Zabihzadeh, Mansoor
Khezerloo, Davood
author_sort Birgani, Mohamad Javad Tahmasebi
collection PubMed
description Nowadays, in most radiotherapy departments, the commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) used to calculate dose distributions needs to be verified; therefore, quick, easy‐to‐use, and low‐cost dose distribution algorithms are desirable to test and verify the performance of the TPS. In this paper, we put forth an analytical method to calculate the phantom scatter contribution and depth dose on the central axis based on the equivalent square concept. Then, this method was generalized to calculate the profiles at any depth and for several field shapes — regular or irregular fields—under symmetry and asymmetry photon beam conditions. Varian 2100 C/D and Siemens Primus Plus linacs with 6 and 18 MV photon beam were used for irradiations. Percentage depth doses (PDDs) were measured for a large number of square fields for both energies and for 45° wedge, which were employed to obtain the profiles in any depth. To assess the accuracy of the calculated profiles, several profile measurements were carried out for some treatment fields. The calculated and measured profiles were compared by gamma‐index calculation. All γ–index calculations were based on a 3% dose criterion and a 3 mm dose‐to‐agreement (DTA) acceptance criterion. The γ values were less than 1 at most points. However, the maximum γ observed was about 1.10 in the penumbra region in most fields and in the central area for the asymmetric fields. This analytical approach provides a generally quick and fairly accurate algorithm to calculate dose distribution for some treatment fields in conventional radiotherapy. PACS number: 87.10.Ca
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5714631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57146312018-04-02 Analytical approach for determining beam profiles in water phantom of symmetric and asymmetric fields of wedged, blocked, and open photon beams Birgani, Mohamad Javad Tahmasebi Chegeni, Nahid Arvandi, Shole Ghalaee, Sasan Razmjoo Zabihzadeh, Mansoor Khezerloo, Davood J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Nowadays, in most radiotherapy departments, the commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) used to calculate dose distributions needs to be verified; therefore, quick, easy‐to‐use, and low‐cost dose distribution algorithms are desirable to test and verify the performance of the TPS. In this paper, we put forth an analytical method to calculate the phantom scatter contribution and depth dose on the central axis based on the equivalent square concept. Then, this method was generalized to calculate the profiles at any depth and for several field shapes — regular or irregular fields—under symmetry and asymmetry photon beam conditions. Varian 2100 C/D and Siemens Primus Plus linacs with 6 and 18 MV photon beam were used for irradiations. Percentage depth doses (PDDs) were measured for a large number of square fields for both energies and for 45° wedge, which were employed to obtain the profiles in any depth. To assess the accuracy of the calculated profiles, several profile measurements were carried out for some treatment fields. The calculated and measured profiles were compared by gamma‐index calculation. All γ–index calculations were based on a 3% dose criterion and a 3 mm dose‐to‐agreement (DTA) acceptance criterion. The γ values were less than 1 at most points. However, the maximum γ observed was about 1.10 in the penumbra region in most fields and in the central area for the asymmetric fields. This analytical approach provides a generally quick and fairly accurate algorithm to calculate dose distribution for some treatment fields in conventional radiotherapy. PACS number: 87.10.Ca John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5714631/ /pubmed/24257268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i6.3918 Text en © 2013 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Birgani, Mohamad Javad Tahmasebi
Chegeni, Nahid
Arvandi, Shole
Ghalaee, Sasan Razmjoo
Zabihzadeh, Mansoor
Khezerloo, Davood
Analytical approach for determining beam profiles in water phantom of symmetric and asymmetric fields of wedged, blocked, and open photon beams
title Analytical approach for determining beam profiles in water phantom of symmetric and asymmetric fields of wedged, blocked, and open photon beams
title_full Analytical approach for determining beam profiles in water phantom of symmetric and asymmetric fields of wedged, blocked, and open photon beams
title_fullStr Analytical approach for determining beam profiles in water phantom of symmetric and asymmetric fields of wedged, blocked, and open photon beams
title_full_unstemmed Analytical approach for determining beam profiles in water phantom of symmetric and asymmetric fields of wedged, blocked, and open photon beams
title_short Analytical approach for determining beam profiles in water phantom of symmetric and asymmetric fields of wedged, blocked, and open photon beams
title_sort analytical approach for determining beam profiles in water phantom of symmetric and asymmetric fields of wedged, blocked, and open photon beams
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24257268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i6.3918
work_keys_str_mv AT birganimohamadjavadtahmasebi analyticalapproachfordeterminingbeamprofilesinwaterphantomofsymmetricandasymmetricfieldsofwedgedblockedandopenphotonbeams
AT chegeninahid analyticalapproachfordeterminingbeamprofilesinwaterphantomofsymmetricandasymmetricfieldsofwedgedblockedandopenphotonbeams
AT arvandishole analyticalapproachfordeterminingbeamprofilesinwaterphantomofsymmetricandasymmetricfieldsofwedgedblockedandopenphotonbeams
AT ghalaeesasanrazmjoo analyticalapproachfordeterminingbeamprofilesinwaterphantomofsymmetricandasymmetricfieldsofwedgedblockedandopenphotonbeams
AT zabihzadehmansoor analyticalapproachfordeterminingbeamprofilesinwaterphantomofsymmetricandasymmetricfieldsofwedgedblockedandopenphotonbeams
AT khezerloodavood analyticalapproachfordeterminingbeamprofilesinwaterphantomofsymmetricandasymmetricfieldsofwedgedblockedandopenphotonbeams