Cargando…
Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques
BACKGROUND: Digital nerve block is commonly performed by care providers in medical fields. This study compares the blocks in terms of effectiveness of anesthesia and pain. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups. First group underwent digital block whereas 2(nd) group had transmetacarpal digi...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218285 |
_version_ | 1783283663326150656 |
---|---|
author | Ahmad, Muhammad |
author_facet | Ahmad, Muhammad |
author_sort | Ahmad, Muhammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Digital nerve block is commonly performed by care providers in medical fields. This study compares the blocks in terms of effectiveness of anesthesia and pain. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups. First group underwent digital block whereas 2(nd) group had transmetacarpal digital block. The subcutaneous ring block was performed by two injections of 3 ml of 2% lignocaine in a 3 ml syringe with a 26G needle at the level of phalangeal/palmer crease. One prick was performed on either side of the finger base extending on dorsal and volar aspects of the digit. The transmetacarpal block received lignocaine identically at dorsal aspect of metacarpo-phalangeal joint. 1.5ml of the solution was injected in dorsal and 1.5ml in palmer side on either side of the finger. When sensation of needle was felt, 1ml of the solution was injected. Then the needle was withdrawn injecting another 1ml and finally the last 1ml was injected close to the dorsal skin. The pain prick was recorded after 30 seconds. RESULTS: The mean time to complete abolition of sensation was 9.1 minutes in group I and 9.0 minutes in group II. The mean duration of anaesthesia was 202 minutes in group I and 206.8 minutes in group II. The mean pain scale was 5.67 (range=4–7) in group I and 4.2 (range=3–7) in group II. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous ring block and transmetacarpal techniques are good in digital anesthesia and involve the administration of the local anaesthetic through two injections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5714981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57149812017-12-07 Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques Ahmad, Muhammad World J Plast Surg Short Communication BACKGROUND: Digital nerve block is commonly performed by care providers in medical fields. This study compares the blocks in terms of effectiveness of anesthesia and pain. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups. First group underwent digital block whereas 2(nd) group had transmetacarpal digital block. The subcutaneous ring block was performed by two injections of 3 ml of 2% lignocaine in a 3 ml syringe with a 26G needle at the level of phalangeal/palmer crease. One prick was performed on either side of the finger base extending on dorsal and volar aspects of the digit. The transmetacarpal block received lignocaine identically at dorsal aspect of metacarpo-phalangeal joint. 1.5ml of the solution was injected in dorsal and 1.5ml in palmer side on either side of the finger. When sensation of needle was felt, 1ml of the solution was injected. Then the needle was withdrawn injecting another 1ml and finally the last 1ml was injected close to the dorsal skin. The pain prick was recorded after 30 seconds. RESULTS: The mean time to complete abolition of sensation was 9.1 minutes in group I and 9.0 minutes in group II. The mean duration of anaesthesia was 202 minutes in group I and 206.8 minutes in group II. The mean pain scale was 5.67 (range=4–7) in group I and 4.2 (range=3–7) in group II. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous ring block and transmetacarpal techniques are good in digital anesthesia and involve the administration of the local anaesthetic through two injections. Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5714981/ /pubmed/29218285 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Ahmad, Muhammad Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques |
title | Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques |
title_full | Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques |
title_short | Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques |
title_sort | efficacy of digital anesthesia: comparison of two techniques |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmadmuhammad efficacyofdigitalanesthesiacomparisonoftwotechniques |