Cargando…

Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques

BACKGROUND: Digital nerve block is commonly performed by care providers in medical fields. This study compares the blocks in terms of effectiveness of anesthesia and pain. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups. First group underwent digital block whereas 2(nd) group had transmetacarpal digi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ahmad, Muhammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218285
_version_ 1783283663326150656
author Ahmad, Muhammad
author_facet Ahmad, Muhammad
author_sort Ahmad, Muhammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital nerve block is commonly performed by care providers in medical fields. This study compares the blocks in terms of effectiveness of anesthesia and pain. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups. First group underwent digital block whereas 2(nd) group had transmetacarpal digital block. The subcutaneous ring block was performed by two injections of 3 ml of 2% lignocaine in a 3 ml syringe with a 26G needle at the level of phalangeal/palmer crease. One prick was performed on either side of the finger base extending on dorsal and volar aspects of the digit. The transmetacarpal block received lignocaine identically at dorsal aspect of metacarpo-phalangeal joint. 1.5ml of the solution was injected in dorsal and 1.5ml in palmer side on either side of the finger. When sensation of needle was felt, 1ml of the solution was injected. Then the needle was withdrawn injecting another 1ml and finally the last 1ml was injected close to the dorsal skin. The pain prick was recorded after 30 seconds. RESULTS: The mean time to complete abolition of sensation was 9.1 minutes in group I and 9.0 minutes in group II. The mean duration of anaesthesia was 202 minutes in group I and 206.8 minutes in group II. The mean pain scale was 5.67 (range=4–7) in group I and 4.2 (range=3–7) in group II. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous ring block and transmetacarpal techniques are good in digital anesthesia and involve the administration of the local anaesthetic through two injections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5714981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57149812017-12-07 Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques Ahmad, Muhammad World J Plast Surg Short Communication BACKGROUND: Digital nerve block is commonly performed by care providers in medical fields. This study compares the blocks in terms of effectiveness of anesthesia and pain. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups. First group underwent digital block whereas 2(nd) group had transmetacarpal digital block. The subcutaneous ring block was performed by two injections of 3 ml of 2% lignocaine in a 3 ml syringe with a 26G needle at the level of phalangeal/palmer crease. One prick was performed on either side of the finger base extending on dorsal and volar aspects of the digit. The transmetacarpal block received lignocaine identically at dorsal aspect of metacarpo-phalangeal joint. 1.5ml of the solution was injected in dorsal and 1.5ml in palmer side on either side of the finger. When sensation of needle was felt, 1ml of the solution was injected. Then the needle was withdrawn injecting another 1ml and finally the last 1ml was injected close to the dorsal skin. The pain prick was recorded after 30 seconds. RESULTS: The mean time to complete abolition of sensation was 9.1 minutes in group I and 9.0 minutes in group II. The mean duration of anaesthesia was 202 minutes in group I and 206.8 minutes in group II. The mean pain scale was 5.67 (range=4–7) in group I and 4.2 (range=3–7) in group II. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous ring block and transmetacarpal techniques are good in digital anesthesia and involve the administration of the local anaesthetic through two injections. Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5714981/ /pubmed/29218285 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Ahmad, Muhammad
Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques
title Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques
title_full Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques
title_fullStr Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques
title_short Efficacy of Digital Anesthesia: Comparison of Two Techniques
title_sort efficacy of digital anesthesia: comparison of two techniques
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218285
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadmuhammad efficacyofdigitalanesthesiacomparisonoftwotechniques