Cargando…

Laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: In colon cancer, T4 stage is still assumed to be a relative contraindication for laparoscopic surgery considering the oncological safety. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate short- and long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klaver, Charlotte E. L., Kappen, Tijmen M., Borstlap, Wernard A. A., Bemelman, Willem A., Tanis, Pieter J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5544-7
_version_ 1783283678005166080
author Klaver, Charlotte E. L.
Kappen, Tijmen M.
Borstlap, Wernard A. A.
Bemelman, Willem A.
Tanis, Pieter J.
author_facet Klaver, Charlotte E. L.
Kappen, Tijmen M.
Borstlap, Wernard A. A.
Bemelman, Willem A.
Tanis, Pieter J.
author_sort Klaver, Charlotte E. L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In colon cancer, T4 stage is still assumed to be a relative contraindication for laparoscopic surgery considering the oncological safety. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate short- and long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer, and to compare these with open surgery. METHODS: Using systematic review of literature, studies reporting on radicality of resection, disease-free survival (DFS), and/or overall survival (OS) after laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer were identified, with or without a control group of open surgery. Pooled proportions and risk ratios were calculated using an inverse variance method. RESULTS: Thirteen observational cohort studies published between 2012 and 2017 were included, together consisting of 1217 patients that received laparoscopic surgery and 1357 with an open procedure. The proportion of multivisceral resections was larger in the open group in five studies. Based on 11 studies, the pooled proportion of R0 resection was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.91–0.99) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.90–0.98) after laparoscopic and open surgery, respectively. Analysing (mainly) T4a subgroups in 6 evaluable studies revealed pooled R0 resection rates of 0.94 in both groups. No significant differences were found between laparoscopic and open surgery for any survival measure: RR 1.07 (95% CI: 0.96–1.20) for 3-year DFS, RR 1.04 (95% CI: 0.95–1.15) for 5-year DFS, RR 1.07 (95% CI: 0.99–1.14) for 3-year OS, and RR 1.05 (95% CI: 0.98–1.12) for 5-year OS. CONCLUSION: Literature on laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer is restricted to non-randomized comparisons with substantial allocation bias. Laparoscopic surgery for T4a tumours might be safe, whereas for T4b colon cancer requiring multivisceral resection it should be applied with caution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5544-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5715041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57150412017-12-11 Laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Klaver, Charlotte E. L. Kappen, Tijmen M. Borstlap, Wernard A. A. Bemelman, Willem A. Tanis, Pieter J. Surg Endosc Review BACKGROUND: In colon cancer, T4 stage is still assumed to be a relative contraindication for laparoscopic surgery considering the oncological safety. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate short- and long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer, and to compare these with open surgery. METHODS: Using systematic review of literature, studies reporting on radicality of resection, disease-free survival (DFS), and/or overall survival (OS) after laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer were identified, with or without a control group of open surgery. Pooled proportions and risk ratios were calculated using an inverse variance method. RESULTS: Thirteen observational cohort studies published between 2012 and 2017 were included, together consisting of 1217 patients that received laparoscopic surgery and 1357 with an open procedure. The proportion of multivisceral resections was larger in the open group in five studies. Based on 11 studies, the pooled proportion of R0 resection was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.91–0.99) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.90–0.98) after laparoscopic and open surgery, respectively. Analysing (mainly) T4a subgroups in 6 evaluable studies revealed pooled R0 resection rates of 0.94 in both groups. No significant differences were found between laparoscopic and open surgery for any survival measure: RR 1.07 (95% CI: 0.96–1.20) for 3-year DFS, RR 1.04 (95% CI: 0.95–1.15) for 5-year DFS, RR 1.07 (95% CI: 0.99–1.14) for 3-year OS, and RR 1.05 (95% CI: 0.98–1.12) for 5-year OS. CONCLUSION: Literature on laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer is restricted to non-randomized comparisons with substantial allocation bias. Laparoscopic surgery for T4a tumours might be safe, whereas for T4b colon cancer requiring multivisceral resection it should be applied with caution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5544-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-04-21 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5715041/ /pubmed/28432461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5544-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Klaver, Charlotte E. L.
Kappen, Tijmen M.
Borstlap, Wernard A. A.
Bemelman, Willem A.
Tanis, Pieter J.
Laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort laparoscopic surgery for t4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5544-7
work_keys_str_mv AT klavercharlotteel laparoscopicsurgeryfort4coloncancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kappentijmenm laparoscopicsurgeryfort4coloncancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT borstlapwernardaa laparoscopicsurgeryfort4coloncancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bemelmanwillema laparoscopicsurgeryfort4coloncancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tanispieterj laparoscopicsurgeryfort4coloncancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis