Cargando…
The individual environment, not the family is the most important influence on preferences for common non-alcoholic beverages in adolescence
Beverage preferences are an important driver of consumption, and strong liking for beverages high in energy (e.g. sugar-sweetened beverages [SSBs]) and dislike for beverages low in energy (e.g. non-nutritive sweetened beverages [NNSBs]) are potentially modifiable risk factors contributing to variati...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29203875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17020-x |
_version_ | 1783283697371316224 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Andrea D. Fildes, Alison Forwood, Suzanna Cooke, Lucy Llewellyn, Clare |
author_facet | Smith, Andrea D. Fildes, Alison Forwood, Suzanna Cooke, Lucy Llewellyn, Clare |
author_sort | Smith, Andrea D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Beverage preferences are an important driver of consumption, and strong liking for beverages high in energy (e.g. sugar-sweetened beverages [SSBs]) and dislike for beverages low in energy (e.g. non-nutritive sweetened beverages [NNSBs]) are potentially modifiable risk factors contributing to variation in intake. Twin studies have established that both genes and environment play important roles in shaping food preferences; but the aetiology of variation in non-alcoholic beverage preferences is unknown. 2865 adolescent twins (18–19-years old) from the Twins Early Development Study were used to quantify genetic and environmental influence on variation in liking for seven non-alcoholic beverages: SSBs; NNSBs; fruit cordials, orange juice, milk, coffee, and tea. Maximum Likelihood Structural Equation Modelling established that beverage preferences have a moderate to low genetic basis; from 18% (95% CI: 10%, 25%) for orange juice to 42% (36%, 43%) for fruit cordials. Aspects of the environment that are not shared by twin pairs explained all remaining variance in drink preferences. The sizeable unique environmental influence on beverage preferences highlights the potential for environmental modification. Policies and guidelines to change preferences for unhealthy beverages may therefore be best directed at the wider environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5715117 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57151172017-12-08 The individual environment, not the family is the most important influence on preferences for common non-alcoholic beverages in adolescence Smith, Andrea D. Fildes, Alison Forwood, Suzanna Cooke, Lucy Llewellyn, Clare Sci Rep Article Beverage preferences are an important driver of consumption, and strong liking for beverages high in energy (e.g. sugar-sweetened beverages [SSBs]) and dislike for beverages low in energy (e.g. non-nutritive sweetened beverages [NNSBs]) are potentially modifiable risk factors contributing to variation in intake. Twin studies have established that both genes and environment play important roles in shaping food preferences; but the aetiology of variation in non-alcoholic beverage preferences is unknown. 2865 adolescent twins (18–19-years old) from the Twins Early Development Study were used to quantify genetic and environmental influence on variation in liking for seven non-alcoholic beverages: SSBs; NNSBs; fruit cordials, orange juice, milk, coffee, and tea. Maximum Likelihood Structural Equation Modelling established that beverage preferences have a moderate to low genetic basis; from 18% (95% CI: 10%, 25%) for orange juice to 42% (36%, 43%) for fruit cordials. Aspects of the environment that are not shared by twin pairs explained all remaining variance in drink preferences. The sizeable unique environmental influence on beverage preferences highlights the potential for environmental modification. Policies and guidelines to change preferences for unhealthy beverages may therefore be best directed at the wider environment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5715117/ /pubmed/29203875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17020-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Smith, Andrea D. Fildes, Alison Forwood, Suzanna Cooke, Lucy Llewellyn, Clare The individual environment, not the family is the most important influence on preferences for common non-alcoholic beverages in adolescence |
title | The individual environment, not the family is the most important influence on preferences for common non-alcoholic beverages in adolescence |
title_full | The individual environment, not the family is the most important influence on preferences for common non-alcoholic beverages in adolescence |
title_fullStr | The individual environment, not the family is the most important influence on preferences for common non-alcoholic beverages in adolescence |
title_full_unstemmed | The individual environment, not the family is the most important influence on preferences for common non-alcoholic beverages in adolescence |
title_short | The individual environment, not the family is the most important influence on preferences for common non-alcoholic beverages in adolescence |
title_sort | individual environment, not the family is the most important influence on preferences for common non-alcoholic beverages in adolescence |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29203875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17020-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithandread theindividualenvironmentnotthefamilyisthemostimportantinfluenceonpreferencesforcommonnonalcoholicbeveragesinadolescence AT fildesalison theindividualenvironmentnotthefamilyisthemostimportantinfluenceonpreferencesforcommonnonalcoholicbeveragesinadolescence AT forwoodsuzanna theindividualenvironmentnotthefamilyisthemostimportantinfluenceonpreferencesforcommonnonalcoholicbeveragesinadolescence AT cookelucy theindividualenvironmentnotthefamilyisthemostimportantinfluenceonpreferencesforcommonnonalcoholicbeveragesinadolescence AT llewellynclare theindividualenvironmentnotthefamilyisthemostimportantinfluenceonpreferencesforcommonnonalcoholicbeveragesinadolescence AT smithandread individualenvironmentnotthefamilyisthemostimportantinfluenceonpreferencesforcommonnonalcoholicbeveragesinadolescence AT fildesalison individualenvironmentnotthefamilyisthemostimportantinfluenceonpreferencesforcommonnonalcoholicbeveragesinadolescence AT forwoodsuzanna individualenvironmentnotthefamilyisthemostimportantinfluenceonpreferencesforcommonnonalcoholicbeveragesinadolescence AT cookelucy individualenvironmentnotthefamilyisthemostimportantinfluenceonpreferencesforcommonnonalcoholicbeveragesinadolescence AT llewellynclare individualenvironmentnotthefamilyisthemostimportantinfluenceonpreferencesforcommonnonalcoholicbeveragesinadolescence |