Cargando…

The development and implementation of a performance appraisal framework for radiation therapists in planning and simulation

It is a challenge for radiation therapists (RTs) to keep pace with changing planning technology and techniques while maintaining appropriate skills levels. The ability of individual RTs to meet the demands of this constantly changing practice can only be assured through establishing clearly defined...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becker, Jillian, Bridge, Pete, Brown, Elizabeth, Ferrari‐Anderson, Janet, Lusk, Ryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29030912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.249
_version_ 1783283729788043264
author Becker, Jillian
Bridge, Pete
Brown, Elizabeth
Ferrari‐Anderson, Janet
Lusk, Ryan
author_facet Becker, Jillian
Bridge, Pete
Brown, Elizabeth
Ferrari‐Anderson, Janet
Lusk, Ryan
author_sort Becker, Jillian
collection PubMed
description It is a challenge for radiation therapists (RTs) to keep pace with changing planning technology and techniques while maintaining appropriate skills levels. The ability of individual RTs to meet the demands of this constantly changing practice can only be assured through establishing clearly defined standards for practice and a systematic process for providing feedback on performance. Investigation into existing models for performance appraisal produced minimal results so a radiation therapy‐specific framework was developed. The goal for this initiative was to establish a framework that would reflect the complexity of practice and provide a clear measure of performance against them. This paper outlines the implementation of this framework into practice and discusses some lessons learned in the process. The framework was developed and implemented in six stages: (1) project team, (2) scope, (3) dosimetry pilot, (4) staff consultation, (5) finalisation and implementation and (6) future development and evaluation. Both cultural and organisational obstacles needed to be addressed before this framework could be successfully introduced. Even though this slowed progress, addressing these obstacles during the development process was essential to the success of this framework. The incremental approach provided the opportunity for each aspect to be tested and the development of subsequent stages to be informed by lessons learned during the previous one. This approach may be beneficial when developing and implementing projects involving performance appraisal to promote consistency, fairness and quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5715258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57152582017-12-08 The development and implementation of a performance appraisal framework for radiation therapists in planning and simulation Becker, Jillian Bridge, Pete Brown, Elizabeth Ferrari‐Anderson, Janet Lusk, Ryan J Med Radiat Sci Commentaries It is a challenge for radiation therapists (RTs) to keep pace with changing planning technology and techniques while maintaining appropriate skills levels. The ability of individual RTs to meet the demands of this constantly changing practice can only be assured through establishing clearly defined standards for practice and a systematic process for providing feedback on performance. Investigation into existing models for performance appraisal produced minimal results so a radiation therapy‐specific framework was developed. The goal for this initiative was to establish a framework that would reflect the complexity of practice and provide a clear measure of performance against them. This paper outlines the implementation of this framework into practice and discusses some lessons learned in the process. The framework was developed and implemented in six stages: (1) project team, (2) scope, (3) dosimetry pilot, (4) staff consultation, (5) finalisation and implementation and (6) future development and evaluation. Both cultural and organisational obstacles needed to be addressed before this framework could be successfully introduced. Even though this slowed progress, addressing these obstacles during the development process was essential to the success of this framework. The incremental approach provided the opportunity for each aspect to be tested and the development of subsequent stages to be informed by lessons learned during the previous one. This approach may be beneficial when developing and implementing projects involving performance appraisal to promote consistency, fairness and quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-14 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5715258/ /pubmed/29030912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.249 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Commentaries
Becker, Jillian
Bridge, Pete
Brown, Elizabeth
Ferrari‐Anderson, Janet
Lusk, Ryan
The development and implementation of a performance appraisal framework for radiation therapists in planning and simulation
title The development and implementation of a performance appraisal framework for radiation therapists in planning and simulation
title_full The development and implementation of a performance appraisal framework for radiation therapists in planning and simulation
title_fullStr The development and implementation of a performance appraisal framework for radiation therapists in planning and simulation
title_full_unstemmed The development and implementation of a performance appraisal framework for radiation therapists in planning and simulation
title_short The development and implementation of a performance appraisal framework for radiation therapists in planning and simulation
title_sort development and implementation of a performance appraisal framework for radiation therapists in planning and simulation
topic Commentaries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29030912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.249
work_keys_str_mv AT beckerjillian thedevelopmentandimplementationofaperformanceappraisalframeworkforradiationtherapistsinplanningandsimulation
AT bridgepete thedevelopmentandimplementationofaperformanceappraisalframeworkforradiationtherapistsinplanningandsimulation
AT brownelizabeth thedevelopmentandimplementationofaperformanceappraisalframeworkforradiationtherapistsinplanningandsimulation
AT ferrariandersonjanet thedevelopmentandimplementationofaperformanceappraisalframeworkforradiationtherapistsinplanningandsimulation
AT luskryan thedevelopmentandimplementationofaperformanceappraisalframeworkforradiationtherapistsinplanningandsimulation
AT beckerjillian developmentandimplementationofaperformanceappraisalframeworkforradiationtherapistsinplanningandsimulation
AT bridgepete developmentandimplementationofaperformanceappraisalframeworkforradiationtherapistsinplanningandsimulation
AT brownelizabeth developmentandimplementationofaperformanceappraisalframeworkforradiationtherapistsinplanningandsimulation
AT ferrariandersonjanet developmentandimplementationofaperformanceappraisalframeworkforradiationtherapistsinplanningandsimulation
AT luskryan developmentandimplementationofaperformanceappraisalframeworkforradiationtherapistsinplanningandsimulation