Cargando…
Social Fear Conditioning Paradigm in Virtual Reality: Social vs. Electrical Aversive Conditioning
In a previous study we could show that social fear can be induced and extinguished using virtual reality (VR). In the present study, we aimed to investigate the belongingness effect in an operant social fear conditioning (SFC) paradigm which consisted of an acquisition and an extinction phase. Forty...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29250000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01979 |
_version_ | 1783283742654070784 |
---|---|
author | Reichenberger, Jonas Porsch, Sonja Wittmann, Jasmin Zimmermann, Verena Shiban, Youssef |
author_facet | Reichenberger, Jonas Porsch, Sonja Wittmann, Jasmin Zimmermann, Verena Shiban, Youssef |
author_sort | Reichenberger, Jonas |
collection | PubMed |
description | In a previous study we could show that social fear can be induced and extinguished using virtual reality (VR). In the present study, we aimed to investigate the belongingness effect in an operant social fear conditioning (SFC) paradigm which consisted of an acquisition and an extinction phase. Forty-three participants used a joystick to approach different virtual male agents that served as conditioned stimuli. Participants were randomly allocated to one of two experimental conditions. In the electroshock condition, the unconditioned stimulus (US) used during acquisition was an electric stimulation. In the social threat condition, the US consisted of an offense: a spit in the face, mimicked by a sound and a weak air blast to the participant’s neck combined with an insult. In both groups the US was presented when participants were close to the agent (75% contingency for CS+). Outcome variables included subjective, psychophysiological and behavioral data. As expected, fear and contingency ratings increased significantly during acquisition and the differentiation between CS+ and CS- vanished during extinction. Furthermore, a clear difference in skin conductance between CS+ and CS- at the beginning of the acquisition indicated that SFC had been successful. However, a fast habituation to the US was found toward the end of the acquisition phase for the physiological response. Furthermore, participants showed avoidance behavior toward CS+ in both conditions. The results show that social fear can successfully be induced and extinguished in VR in a human sample. Thus, our paradigm can help to gain insight into learning and unlearning of social fear. Regarding the belongingness effect, the social threat condition benefits from a better differentiation between the aversive and the non-aversive stimuli. As next step we suggest comparing social-phobic patients to healthy controls in order to investigate possible differences in discrimination learning and to foster the development of more efficient treatments for social phobia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5715328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57153282017-12-15 Social Fear Conditioning Paradigm in Virtual Reality: Social vs. Electrical Aversive Conditioning Reichenberger, Jonas Porsch, Sonja Wittmann, Jasmin Zimmermann, Verena Shiban, Youssef Front Psychol Psychology In a previous study we could show that social fear can be induced and extinguished using virtual reality (VR). In the present study, we aimed to investigate the belongingness effect in an operant social fear conditioning (SFC) paradigm which consisted of an acquisition and an extinction phase. Forty-three participants used a joystick to approach different virtual male agents that served as conditioned stimuli. Participants were randomly allocated to one of two experimental conditions. In the electroshock condition, the unconditioned stimulus (US) used during acquisition was an electric stimulation. In the social threat condition, the US consisted of an offense: a spit in the face, mimicked by a sound and a weak air blast to the participant’s neck combined with an insult. In both groups the US was presented when participants were close to the agent (75% contingency for CS+). Outcome variables included subjective, psychophysiological and behavioral data. As expected, fear and contingency ratings increased significantly during acquisition and the differentiation between CS+ and CS- vanished during extinction. Furthermore, a clear difference in skin conductance between CS+ and CS- at the beginning of the acquisition indicated that SFC had been successful. However, a fast habituation to the US was found toward the end of the acquisition phase for the physiological response. Furthermore, participants showed avoidance behavior toward CS+ in both conditions. The results show that social fear can successfully be induced and extinguished in VR in a human sample. Thus, our paradigm can help to gain insight into learning and unlearning of social fear. Regarding the belongingness effect, the social threat condition benefits from a better differentiation between the aversive and the non-aversive stimuli. As next step we suggest comparing social-phobic patients to healthy controls in order to investigate possible differences in discrimination learning and to foster the development of more efficient treatments for social phobia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5715328/ /pubmed/29250000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01979 Text en Copyright © 2017 Reichenberger, Porsch, Wittmann, Zimmermann and Shiban. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Reichenberger, Jonas Porsch, Sonja Wittmann, Jasmin Zimmermann, Verena Shiban, Youssef Social Fear Conditioning Paradigm in Virtual Reality: Social vs. Electrical Aversive Conditioning |
title | Social Fear Conditioning Paradigm in Virtual Reality: Social vs. Electrical Aversive Conditioning |
title_full | Social Fear Conditioning Paradigm in Virtual Reality: Social vs. Electrical Aversive Conditioning |
title_fullStr | Social Fear Conditioning Paradigm in Virtual Reality: Social vs. Electrical Aversive Conditioning |
title_full_unstemmed | Social Fear Conditioning Paradigm in Virtual Reality: Social vs. Electrical Aversive Conditioning |
title_short | Social Fear Conditioning Paradigm in Virtual Reality: Social vs. Electrical Aversive Conditioning |
title_sort | social fear conditioning paradigm in virtual reality: social vs. electrical aversive conditioning |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29250000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01979 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reichenbergerjonas socialfearconditioningparadigminvirtualrealitysocialvselectricalaversiveconditioning AT porschsonja socialfearconditioningparadigminvirtualrealitysocialvselectricalaversiveconditioning AT wittmannjasmin socialfearconditioningparadigminvirtualrealitysocialvselectricalaversiveconditioning AT zimmermannverena socialfearconditioningparadigminvirtualrealitysocialvselectricalaversiveconditioning AT shibanyoussef socialfearconditioningparadigminvirtualrealitysocialvselectricalaversiveconditioning |