Cargando…

Outcomes of post‐prostatectomy radiotherapy at a Regional Cancer Centre

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of radiation therapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer at Radiation Oncology Centres, Toowoomba. METHODS: The electronic medical records of 130 consecutive patients with histologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma who u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicholls, Luke, Winter, Amber, Harwood, Ashley, Plank, Ashley, Bagga, Preeti, Wong, Winnie, Khoo, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28805047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.240
_version_ 1783283744995540992
author Nicholls, Luke
Winter, Amber
Harwood, Ashley
Plank, Ashley
Bagga, Preeti
Wong, Winnie
Khoo, Eric
author_facet Nicholls, Luke
Winter, Amber
Harwood, Ashley
Plank, Ashley
Bagga, Preeti
Wong, Winnie
Khoo, Eric
author_sort Nicholls, Luke
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of radiation therapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer at Radiation Oncology Centres, Toowoomba. METHODS: The electronic medical records of 130 consecutive patients with histologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent post‐prostatectomy RT between January 2008 and December 2014 were analysed. Primary endpoint was Biochemical Recurrence (BCR) after RT. BCR was defined by PSA > 0.2 ng/mL and BCR endpoints were analysed using Kaplan–Meier methods. The impact of RT technique and the rates of acute and late toxicities are also reported. Toxicities were graded according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. RESULTS: Median follow‐up time after RT (regardless of technique) was 28 months. BCR occurred in 32 of the 126 patients (25%) whose prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels have been monitored post‐RT. At 24 and 36 months, 85% and 75% of patients were BCR‐free, respectively. Patients with a pre‐RT PSA above 0.2 ng/mL had a higher probability of recurrence than patients with values below 0.2 ng/mL (P = 0.03). RT technique, pelvic nodal irradiation, androgen deprivation therapy, T staging or surgical margin did not significantly impact BCR results. No patient experienced acute toxicities greater than grade 2. Grade 1 or 2 late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity occurred in 11% and 1 patient experienced a grade 3 event. 12% of patients developed grade 1 or 2 late genitourinary (GU) toxicity, with evidence of grade 3 severity in only 1 patient. Evidence of a trend in reduction in late GI toxicity with the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) was apparent but not with late GU toxicity. CONCLUSION: At our regional centre, early RT (PSA < 0.2 ng/mL) was associated with significant improvement in BCR‐free survival. Rates of toxicity mirror those of landmark trials which suggest no detriment for our regional prostate cancer patients. The use of IMRT/VMAT techniques was associated with a trend towards reduced rates of GI toxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5715341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57153412017-12-08 Outcomes of post‐prostatectomy radiotherapy at a Regional Cancer Centre Nicholls, Luke Winter, Amber Harwood, Ashley Plank, Ashley Bagga, Preeti Wong, Winnie Khoo, Eric J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of radiation therapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer at Radiation Oncology Centres, Toowoomba. METHODS: The electronic medical records of 130 consecutive patients with histologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent post‐prostatectomy RT between January 2008 and December 2014 were analysed. Primary endpoint was Biochemical Recurrence (BCR) after RT. BCR was defined by PSA > 0.2 ng/mL and BCR endpoints were analysed using Kaplan–Meier methods. The impact of RT technique and the rates of acute and late toxicities are also reported. Toxicities were graded according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. RESULTS: Median follow‐up time after RT (regardless of technique) was 28 months. BCR occurred in 32 of the 126 patients (25%) whose prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels have been monitored post‐RT. At 24 and 36 months, 85% and 75% of patients were BCR‐free, respectively. Patients with a pre‐RT PSA above 0.2 ng/mL had a higher probability of recurrence than patients with values below 0.2 ng/mL (P = 0.03). RT technique, pelvic nodal irradiation, androgen deprivation therapy, T staging or surgical margin did not significantly impact BCR results. No patient experienced acute toxicities greater than grade 2. Grade 1 or 2 late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity occurred in 11% and 1 patient experienced a grade 3 event. 12% of patients developed grade 1 or 2 late genitourinary (GU) toxicity, with evidence of grade 3 severity in only 1 patient. Evidence of a trend in reduction in late GI toxicity with the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) was apparent but not with late GU toxicity. CONCLUSION: At our regional centre, early RT (PSA < 0.2 ng/mL) was associated with significant improvement in BCR‐free survival. Rates of toxicity mirror those of landmark trials which suggest no detriment for our regional prostate cancer patients. The use of IMRT/VMAT techniques was associated with a trend towards reduced rates of GI toxicity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-14 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5715341/ /pubmed/28805047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.240 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nicholls, Luke
Winter, Amber
Harwood, Ashley
Plank, Ashley
Bagga, Preeti
Wong, Winnie
Khoo, Eric
Outcomes of post‐prostatectomy radiotherapy at a Regional Cancer Centre
title Outcomes of post‐prostatectomy radiotherapy at a Regional Cancer Centre
title_full Outcomes of post‐prostatectomy radiotherapy at a Regional Cancer Centre
title_fullStr Outcomes of post‐prostatectomy radiotherapy at a Regional Cancer Centre
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of post‐prostatectomy radiotherapy at a Regional Cancer Centre
title_short Outcomes of post‐prostatectomy radiotherapy at a Regional Cancer Centre
title_sort outcomes of post‐prostatectomy radiotherapy at a regional cancer centre
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28805047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.240
work_keys_str_mv AT nichollsluke outcomesofpostprostatectomyradiotherapyataregionalcancercentre
AT winteramber outcomesofpostprostatectomyradiotherapyataregionalcancercentre
AT harwoodashley outcomesofpostprostatectomyradiotherapyataregionalcancercentre
AT plankashley outcomesofpostprostatectomyradiotherapyataregionalcancercentre
AT baggapreeti outcomesofpostprostatectomyradiotherapyataregionalcancercentre
AT wongwinnie outcomesofpostprostatectomyradiotherapyataregionalcancercentre
AT khooeric outcomesofpostprostatectomyradiotherapyataregionalcancercentre