Cargando…

Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this research were to: (1) determine the extent of Australian radiation therapists (RTs) research participation; (2) evaluate the impact of research involvement on career perceptions (3) explore which research topics require investigation and (4) identify benefits and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halkett, Georgia K. B., Berg, Melissa, Ebert, Martin A., Cutt, David, Davis, Michael, Hegney, Desley, House, Michael, Judson, Michelle, Kearvell, Rachel, Krawiec, Michele, Lester, Leanne, Maresse, Sharon, McLoone, Peter, McKay, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28731288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.237
_version_ 1783283746195111936
author Halkett, Georgia K. B.
Berg, Melissa
Ebert, Martin A.
Cutt, David
Davis, Michael
Hegney, Desley
House, Michael
Judson, Michelle
Kearvell, Rachel
Krawiec, Michele
Lester, Leanne
Maresse, Sharon
McLoone, Peter
McKay, Jan
author_facet Halkett, Georgia K. B.
Berg, Melissa
Ebert, Martin A.
Cutt, David
Davis, Michael
Hegney, Desley
House, Michael
Judson, Michelle
Kearvell, Rachel
Krawiec, Michele
Lester, Leanne
Maresse, Sharon
McLoone, Peter
McKay, Jan
author_sort Halkett, Georgia K. B.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this research were to: (1) determine the extent of Australian radiation therapists (RTs) research participation; (2) evaluate the impact of research involvement on career perceptions (3) explore which research topics require investigation and (4) identify benefits and barriers to research participation. METHODS: This study used mixed methods to collect qualitative and quantitative data using an online survey from a larger workforce study of RTs and radiation oncology medical physicists. Participants practising in Australia completed questions about their research involvement. Chi‐square tests and logistic regression were used to analyse quantitative data and content analysis was used to explore qualitative data. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety‐six RTs answered the research questions. Forty‐six percent had been involved in research. Of these, 91% had been involved in departmental, 28% in national, 14% in international and 29% in informal or self‐directed research studies. Eleven RTs (8%) had received funding as a chief/principal investigator. Involvement in research was associated with a desire to make a career change. However, it also appeared to be associated with greater satisfaction with career progression and staying in the career. Respondents identified a range of potential research topics, benefits of participating in research and barriers which included lack of time, support and cost. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the RT participants identified that they were participating in research. Our data suggest that continued involvement in research, and opportunities to participate, improve RT job satisfaction. RTs' research activities are likely to be extended through provision of additional time and support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5715346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57153462017-12-08 Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research Halkett, Georgia K. B. Berg, Melissa Ebert, Martin A. Cutt, David Davis, Michael Hegney, Desley House, Michael Judson, Michelle Kearvell, Rachel Krawiec, Michele Lester, Leanne Maresse, Sharon McLoone, Peter McKay, Jan J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this research were to: (1) determine the extent of Australian radiation therapists (RTs) research participation; (2) evaluate the impact of research involvement on career perceptions (3) explore which research topics require investigation and (4) identify benefits and barriers to research participation. METHODS: This study used mixed methods to collect qualitative and quantitative data using an online survey from a larger workforce study of RTs and radiation oncology medical physicists. Participants practising in Australia completed questions about their research involvement. Chi‐square tests and logistic regression were used to analyse quantitative data and content analysis was used to explore qualitative data. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety‐six RTs answered the research questions. Forty‐six percent had been involved in research. Of these, 91% had been involved in departmental, 28% in national, 14% in international and 29% in informal or self‐directed research studies. Eleven RTs (8%) had received funding as a chief/principal investigator. Involvement in research was associated with a desire to make a career change. However, it also appeared to be associated with greater satisfaction with career progression and staying in the career. Respondents identified a range of potential research topics, benefits of participating in research and barriers which included lack of time, support and cost. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the RT participants identified that they were participating in research. Our data suggest that continued involvement in research, and opportunities to participate, improve RT job satisfaction. RTs' research activities are likely to be extended through provision of additional time and support. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-21 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5715346/ /pubmed/28731288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.237 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Halkett, Georgia K. B.
Berg, Melissa
Ebert, Martin A.
Cutt, David
Davis, Michael
Hegney, Desley
House, Michael
Judson, Michelle
Kearvell, Rachel
Krawiec, Michele
Lester, Leanne
Maresse, Sharon
McLoone, Peter
McKay, Jan
Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research
title Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research
title_full Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research
title_fullStr Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research
title_full_unstemmed Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research
title_short Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research
title_sort radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28731288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.237
work_keys_str_mv AT halkettgeorgiakb radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch
AT bergmelissa radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch
AT ebertmartina radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch
AT cuttdavid radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch
AT davismichael radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch
AT hegneydesley radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch
AT housemichael radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch
AT judsonmichelle radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch
AT kearvellrachel radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch
AT krawiecmichele radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch
AT lesterleanne radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch
AT maressesharon radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch
AT mcloonepeter radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch
AT mckayjan radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch