Cargando…
Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research
INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this research were to: (1) determine the extent of Australian radiation therapists (RTs) research participation; (2) evaluate the impact of research involvement on career perceptions (3) explore which research topics require investigation and (4) identify benefits and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28731288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.237 |
_version_ | 1783283746195111936 |
---|---|
author | Halkett, Georgia K. B. Berg, Melissa Ebert, Martin A. Cutt, David Davis, Michael Hegney, Desley House, Michael Judson, Michelle Kearvell, Rachel Krawiec, Michele Lester, Leanne Maresse, Sharon McLoone, Peter McKay, Jan |
author_facet | Halkett, Georgia K. B. Berg, Melissa Ebert, Martin A. Cutt, David Davis, Michael Hegney, Desley House, Michael Judson, Michelle Kearvell, Rachel Krawiec, Michele Lester, Leanne Maresse, Sharon McLoone, Peter McKay, Jan |
author_sort | Halkett, Georgia K. B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this research were to: (1) determine the extent of Australian radiation therapists (RTs) research participation; (2) evaluate the impact of research involvement on career perceptions (3) explore which research topics require investigation and (4) identify benefits and barriers to research participation. METHODS: This study used mixed methods to collect qualitative and quantitative data using an online survey from a larger workforce study of RTs and radiation oncology medical physicists. Participants practising in Australia completed questions about their research involvement. Chi‐square tests and logistic regression were used to analyse quantitative data and content analysis was used to explore qualitative data. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety‐six RTs answered the research questions. Forty‐six percent had been involved in research. Of these, 91% had been involved in departmental, 28% in national, 14% in international and 29% in informal or self‐directed research studies. Eleven RTs (8%) had received funding as a chief/principal investigator. Involvement in research was associated with a desire to make a career change. However, it also appeared to be associated with greater satisfaction with career progression and staying in the career. Respondents identified a range of potential research topics, benefits of participating in research and barriers which included lack of time, support and cost. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the RT participants identified that they were participating in research. Our data suggest that continued involvement in research, and opportunities to participate, improve RT job satisfaction. RTs' research activities are likely to be extended through provision of additional time and support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5715346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57153462017-12-08 Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research Halkett, Georgia K. B. Berg, Melissa Ebert, Martin A. Cutt, David Davis, Michael Hegney, Desley House, Michael Judson, Michelle Kearvell, Rachel Krawiec, Michele Lester, Leanne Maresse, Sharon McLoone, Peter McKay, Jan J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this research were to: (1) determine the extent of Australian radiation therapists (RTs) research participation; (2) evaluate the impact of research involvement on career perceptions (3) explore which research topics require investigation and (4) identify benefits and barriers to research participation. METHODS: This study used mixed methods to collect qualitative and quantitative data using an online survey from a larger workforce study of RTs and radiation oncology medical physicists. Participants practising in Australia completed questions about their research involvement. Chi‐square tests and logistic regression were used to analyse quantitative data and content analysis was used to explore qualitative data. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety‐six RTs answered the research questions. Forty‐six percent had been involved in research. Of these, 91% had been involved in departmental, 28% in national, 14% in international and 29% in informal or self‐directed research studies. Eleven RTs (8%) had received funding as a chief/principal investigator. Involvement in research was associated with a desire to make a career change. However, it also appeared to be associated with greater satisfaction with career progression and staying in the career. Respondents identified a range of potential research topics, benefits of participating in research and barriers which included lack of time, support and cost. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the RT participants identified that they were participating in research. Our data suggest that continued involvement in research, and opportunities to participate, improve RT job satisfaction. RTs' research activities are likely to be extended through provision of additional time and support. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-21 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5715346/ /pubmed/28731288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.237 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Halkett, Georgia K. B. Berg, Melissa Ebert, Martin A. Cutt, David Davis, Michael Hegney, Desley House, Michael Judson, Michelle Kearvell, Rachel Krawiec, Michele Lester, Leanne Maresse, Sharon McLoone, Peter McKay, Jan Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research |
title | Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research |
title_full | Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research |
title_fullStr | Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research |
title_short | Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research |
title_sort | radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28731288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halkettgeorgiakb radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch AT bergmelissa radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch AT ebertmartina radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch AT cuttdavid radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch AT davismichael radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch AT hegneydesley radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch AT housemichael radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch AT judsonmichelle radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch AT kearvellrachel radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch AT krawiecmichele radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch AT lesterleanne radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch AT maressesharon radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch AT mcloonepeter radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch AT mckayjan radiationtherapistsperspectivesonparticipatinginresearch |