Cargando…

Non-tunneled versus tunneled dialysis catheters for acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (AKI-RRT) is associated with high morbidity, mortality and resource utilization. The type of vascular access placed for AKI-RRT is an important decision, for which there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines. METHODS: We conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendu, Mallika L., May, Megan F., Kaze, Arnaud D., Graham, Dionne A., Cui, Salena, Chen, Margaret E., Shin, Naomi, Aizer, Ayal A., Waikar, Sushrut S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0760-x
_version_ 1783283787927388160
author Mendu, Mallika L.
May, Megan F.
Kaze, Arnaud D.
Graham, Dionne A.
Cui, Salena
Chen, Margaret E.
Shin, Naomi
Aizer, Ayal A.
Waikar, Sushrut S.
author_facet Mendu, Mallika L.
May, Megan F.
Kaze, Arnaud D.
Graham, Dionne A.
Cui, Salena
Chen, Margaret E.
Shin, Naomi
Aizer, Ayal A.
Waikar, Sushrut S.
author_sort Mendu, Mallika L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (AKI-RRT) is associated with high morbidity, mortality and resource utilization. The type of vascular access placed for AKI-RRT is an important decision, for which there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study over a 16-month period with 154 patients initiated on AKI-RRT via either a non-tunneled dialysis catheter (NTDC) or a tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) at an academic hospital. We compared differences in renal replacement delivery and mechanical and infectious outcomes between NTDCs and TDCs. RESULTS: Patients who received TDCs had significantly better RRT delivery, both with continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), compared to patients who received NTDCs; these findings were confirmed after multivariable adjustment for AKI-specific disease severity score, history of chronic kidney disease, renal consult team, and AKI cause. In CVVH and IHD, the median venous and arterial blood flow pressures were significantly higher with TDCs compared to NTDCs (p < 0.001). Additionally for CVVH, the median number of interruptions per catheter was higher with NTDCs compared to TDCs (Rate Ratio (RR) 2.7; p < 0.001), and for IHD, a higher median blood flow was seen with TDCs (p < 0.001). There were a significantly higher number of mechanical complications with NTDCs (RR 13.6 p = 0.001). No significant difference was observed between TDCs and NTDCs for positive blood cultures per catheter. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to NTDCs, TDCs for patients with AKI-RRT had improved RRT delivery and fewer mechanical complications. Initial TDC placement for AKI-RRT should be considered when not clinically contraindicated given the potential for improved RRT delivery and outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-017-0760-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5715550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57155502017-12-08 Non-tunneled versus tunneled dialysis catheters for acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study Mendu, Mallika L. May, Megan F. Kaze, Arnaud D. Graham, Dionne A. Cui, Salena Chen, Margaret E. Shin, Naomi Aizer, Ayal A. Waikar, Sushrut S. BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (AKI-RRT) is associated with high morbidity, mortality and resource utilization. The type of vascular access placed for AKI-RRT is an important decision, for which there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study over a 16-month period with 154 patients initiated on AKI-RRT via either a non-tunneled dialysis catheter (NTDC) or a tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) at an academic hospital. We compared differences in renal replacement delivery and mechanical and infectious outcomes between NTDCs and TDCs. RESULTS: Patients who received TDCs had significantly better RRT delivery, both with continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), compared to patients who received NTDCs; these findings were confirmed after multivariable adjustment for AKI-specific disease severity score, history of chronic kidney disease, renal consult team, and AKI cause. In CVVH and IHD, the median venous and arterial blood flow pressures were significantly higher with TDCs compared to NTDCs (p < 0.001). Additionally for CVVH, the median number of interruptions per catheter was higher with NTDCs compared to TDCs (Rate Ratio (RR) 2.7; p < 0.001), and for IHD, a higher median blood flow was seen with TDCs (p < 0.001). There were a significantly higher number of mechanical complications with NTDCs (RR 13.6 p = 0.001). No significant difference was observed between TDCs and NTDCs for positive blood cultures per catheter. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to NTDCs, TDCs for patients with AKI-RRT had improved RRT delivery and fewer mechanical complications. Initial TDC placement for AKI-RRT should be considered when not clinically contraindicated given the potential for improved RRT delivery and outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-017-0760-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5715550/ /pubmed/29202728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0760-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mendu, Mallika L.
May, Megan F.
Kaze, Arnaud D.
Graham, Dionne A.
Cui, Salena
Chen, Margaret E.
Shin, Naomi
Aizer, Ayal A.
Waikar, Sushrut S.
Non-tunneled versus tunneled dialysis catheters for acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study
title Non-tunneled versus tunneled dialysis catheters for acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study
title_full Non-tunneled versus tunneled dialysis catheters for acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Non-tunneled versus tunneled dialysis catheters for acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Non-tunneled versus tunneled dialysis catheters for acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study
title_short Non-tunneled versus tunneled dialysis catheters for acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study
title_sort non-tunneled versus tunneled dialysis catheters for acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0760-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mendumallikal nontunneledversustunneleddialysiscathetersforacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT maymeganf nontunneledversustunneleddialysiscathetersforacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kazearnaudd nontunneledversustunneleddialysiscathetersforacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT grahamdionnea nontunneledversustunneleddialysiscathetersforacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT cuisalena nontunneledversustunneleddialysiscathetersforacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT chenmargarete nontunneledversustunneleddialysiscathetersforacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT shinnaomi nontunneledversustunneleddialysiscathetersforacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT aizerayala nontunneledversustunneleddialysiscathetersforacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT waikarsushruts nontunneledversustunneleddialysiscathetersforacutekidneyinjuryrequiringrenalreplacementtherapyaprospectivecohortstudy