Cargando…
Impact of systolic blood pressure limits on the diagnostic value of triage algorithms
BACKGROUND: Major incidents are characterized by a lack of resources compared to an overwhelming number of casualties, requiring a prioritization of medical treatment. Triage algorithms are an essential tool for prioritizing the urgency of treatment for patients, but the evidence to support one over...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0461-2 |
_version_ | 1783283789606158336 |
---|---|
author | Neidel, Tobias Salvador, Nicolas Heller, Axel R. |
author_facet | Neidel, Tobias Salvador, Nicolas Heller, Axel R. |
author_sort | Neidel, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Major incidents are characterized by a lack of resources compared to an overwhelming number of casualties, requiring a prioritization of medical treatment. Triage algorithms are an essential tool for prioritizing the urgency of treatment for patients, but the evidence to support one over another is very limited. We determined the influence of blood pressure limits on the diagnostic value of triage algorithms, considering if pulse should be palpated centrally or peripherally. METHODS: We used a database representing 500 consecutive HEMS patients. Each patient was allocated a triage category (T1/red, T2/yellow, T3/green) by a group of experienced doctors in disaster medicine, independent of any algorithm. mSTaRT, ASAV, Field Triage Score (FTS), Care Flight (CF), “Model Bavaria” and two Norwegian algorithms (Nor and TAS), all containing the question “Pulse palpable?”, were translated into Excel commands, calculating the triage category for each patient automatically. We used 5 blood pressure limits ranging from 130 to 60 mmHg to determine palpable pulse. The resulting triage categories were analyzed with respect to sensitivity, specificity and Youden Index (J) separately for trauma and non-trauma patients, and for all patients combined. RESULTS: For the entire population of patients within all triage algorithms the Youden Index (J) was highest for T1 (J between 0,14 and 0,62). Combining trauma and non-trauma patients, the highest J was obtained by ASAV (J = 0,62 at 60 mmHg). ASAV scored the highest within trauma patients (J = 0,87 at 60 mmHg), whereas Model Bavaria (J = 0,54 at 80 mmHg) reached highest amongst non-trauma patients. FTS performed worst for all patients (J = 0,14 at 60 mmHg), showing a lower score for trauma patients (J = 0,0 at 60 mmHg). Change of blood pressure limits resulted in different diagnostic values of all algorithms. DISCUSSION: We demonstrate that differing blood pressure limits have a remarkable impact on diagnostic values of triage algorithms. Further research is needed to determine the lowest blood pressure value that is possible to palpate at a peripheral artery compared to a central artery. CONCLUSION: As a consequence, it might be important in which location pulses are palpated according to the algorithm at hand during triage of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5715557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57155572017-12-08 Impact of systolic blood pressure limits on the diagnostic value of triage algorithms Neidel, Tobias Salvador, Nicolas Heller, Axel R. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Major incidents are characterized by a lack of resources compared to an overwhelming number of casualties, requiring a prioritization of medical treatment. Triage algorithms are an essential tool for prioritizing the urgency of treatment for patients, but the evidence to support one over another is very limited. We determined the influence of blood pressure limits on the diagnostic value of triage algorithms, considering if pulse should be palpated centrally or peripherally. METHODS: We used a database representing 500 consecutive HEMS patients. Each patient was allocated a triage category (T1/red, T2/yellow, T3/green) by a group of experienced doctors in disaster medicine, independent of any algorithm. mSTaRT, ASAV, Field Triage Score (FTS), Care Flight (CF), “Model Bavaria” and two Norwegian algorithms (Nor and TAS), all containing the question “Pulse palpable?”, were translated into Excel commands, calculating the triage category for each patient automatically. We used 5 blood pressure limits ranging from 130 to 60 mmHg to determine palpable pulse. The resulting triage categories were analyzed with respect to sensitivity, specificity and Youden Index (J) separately for trauma and non-trauma patients, and for all patients combined. RESULTS: For the entire population of patients within all triage algorithms the Youden Index (J) was highest for T1 (J between 0,14 and 0,62). Combining trauma and non-trauma patients, the highest J was obtained by ASAV (J = 0,62 at 60 mmHg). ASAV scored the highest within trauma patients (J = 0,87 at 60 mmHg), whereas Model Bavaria (J = 0,54 at 80 mmHg) reached highest amongst non-trauma patients. FTS performed worst for all patients (J = 0,14 at 60 mmHg), showing a lower score for trauma patients (J = 0,0 at 60 mmHg). Change of blood pressure limits resulted in different diagnostic values of all algorithms. DISCUSSION: We demonstrate that differing blood pressure limits have a remarkable impact on diagnostic values of triage algorithms. Further research is needed to determine the lowest blood pressure value that is possible to palpate at a peripheral artery compared to a central artery. CONCLUSION: As a consequence, it might be important in which location pulses are palpated according to the algorithm at hand during triage of patients. BioMed Central 2017-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5715557/ /pubmed/29202769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0461-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Neidel, Tobias Salvador, Nicolas Heller, Axel R. Impact of systolic blood pressure limits on the diagnostic value of triage algorithms |
title | Impact of systolic blood pressure limits on the diagnostic value of triage algorithms |
title_full | Impact of systolic blood pressure limits on the diagnostic value of triage algorithms |
title_fullStr | Impact of systolic blood pressure limits on the diagnostic value of triage algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of systolic blood pressure limits on the diagnostic value of triage algorithms |
title_short | Impact of systolic blood pressure limits on the diagnostic value of triage algorithms |
title_sort | impact of systolic blood pressure limits on the diagnostic value of triage algorithms |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0461-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neideltobias impactofsystolicbloodpressurelimitsonthediagnosticvalueoftriagealgorithms AT salvadornicolas impactofsystolicbloodpressurelimitsonthediagnosticvalueoftriagealgorithms AT helleraxelr impactofsystolicbloodpressurelimitsonthediagnosticvalueoftriagealgorithms |