Cargando…
Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study
BACKGROUND: Danish cancer patients have lower survival rates than patients in many other western countries. Half of the patients present with non-alarm symptoms and thus have a long diagnostic pathway. Consequently, an urgent referral pathway for patients with non-specific serious symptoms was imple...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3845-9 |
_version_ | 1783283808632569856 |
---|---|
author | Næser, Esben Møller, Henrik Fredberg, Ulrich Frystyk, Jan Vedsted, Peter |
author_facet | Næser, Esben Møller, Henrik Fredberg, Ulrich Frystyk, Jan Vedsted, Peter |
author_sort | Næser, Esben |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Danish cancer patients have lower survival rates than patients in many other western countries. Half of the patients present with non-alarm symptoms and thus have a long diagnostic pathway. Consequently, an urgent referral pathway for patients with non-specific serious symptoms was implemented throughout Denmark in 2011–2012. As part of the diagnostic workup, a panel of blood tests are performed for all patients referred by their general practitioner (GP) to the urgent referral pathway. In this study, we analysed the probability of being diagnosed with cancer in GP-referred patients with abnormal blood test results. METHOD: We performed a cohort study that included all patients aged 18 years or older referred by their GP to Silkeborg Regional Hospital for analysis of a panel of blood tests. All patients were followed for 3 months for a cancer diagnosis in the Danish Cancer Registry. The likelihood ratio and post-test probability of subsequently finding cancer were calculated in relation to abnormal blood test results. RESULTS: Among the 1499 patients included in the study, 12.2% were subsequently diagnosed with cancer. The probability of cancer increased with the number of abnormal blood tests. Patients with specific combinations of two abnormal blood tests had a 23–62% probability of cancer. Only a few single abnormal blood tests were linked with a high post-test probability of cancer, and most abnormalities were not specific to cancer. CONCLUSIONS: A number of specific abnormal blood tests and combinations of abnormal blood tests markedly increased the probability of cancer being diagnosed. Still, abnormal blood test results should be interpreted cautiously as most are non-specific to cancer. Thus, results from the blood test panel may strengthen the suspicion of cancer, but blood tests cannot be used as a stand-alone tool to rule out cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3845-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5715646 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57156462017-12-08 Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study Næser, Esben Møller, Henrik Fredberg, Ulrich Frystyk, Jan Vedsted, Peter BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Danish cancer patients have lower survival rates than patients in many other western countries. Half of the patients present with non-alarm symptoms and thus have a long diagnostic pathway. Consequently, an urgent referral pathway for patients with non-specific serious symptoms was implemented throughout Denmark in 2011–2012. As part of the diagnostic workup, a panel of blood tests are performed for all patients referred by their general practitioner (GP) to the urgent referral pathway. In this study, we analysed the probability of being diagnosed with cancer in GP-referred patients with abnormal blood test results. METHOD: We performed a cohort study that included all patients aged 18 years or older referred by their GP to Silkeborg Regional Hospital for analysis of a panel of blood tests. All patients were followed for 3 months for a cancer diagnosis in the Danish Cancer Registry. The likelihood ratio and post-test probability of subsequently finding cancer were calculated in relation to abnormal blood test results. RESULTS: Among the 1499 patients included in the study, 12.2% were subsequently diagnosed with cancer. The probability of cancer increased with the number of abnormal blood tests. Patients with specific combinations of two abnormal blood tests had a 23–62% probability of cancer. Only a few single abnormal blood tests were linked with a high post-test probability of cancer, and most abnormalities were not specific to cancer. CONCLUSIONS: A number of specific abnormal blood tests and combinations of abnormal blood tests markedly increased the probability of cancer being diagnosed. Still, abnormal blood test results should be interpreted cautiously as most are non-specific to cancer. Thus, results from the blood test panel may strengthen the suspicion of cancer, but blood tests cannot be used as a stand-alone tool to rule out cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3845-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5715646/ /pubmed/29202799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3845-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Næser, Esben Møller, Henrik Fredberg, Ulrich Frystyk, Jan Vedsted, Peter Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study |
title | Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study |
title_full | Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study |
title_fullStr | Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study |
title_short | Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study |
title_sort | routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3845-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT næseresben routinebloodtestsandprobabilityofcancerinpatientsreferredwithnonspecificserioussymptomsacohortstudy AT møllerhenrik routinebloodtestsandprobabilityofcancerinpatientsreferredwithnonspecificserioussymptomsacohortstudy AT fredbergulrich routinebloodtestsandprobabilityofcancerinpatientsreferredwithnonspecificserioussymptomsacohortstudy AT frystykjan routinebloodtestsandprobabilityofcancerinpatientsreferredwithnonspecificserioussymptomsacohortstudy AT vedstedpeter routinebloodtestsandprobabilityofcancerinpatientsreferredwithnonspecificserioussymptomsacohortstudy |