Cargando…

Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study

BACKGROUND: Danish cancer patients have lower survival rates than patients in many other western countries. Half of the patients present with non-alarm symptoms and thus have a long diagnostic pathway. Consequently, an urgent referral pathway for patients with non-specific serious symptoms was imple...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Næser, Esben, Møller, Henrik, Fredberg, Ulrich, Frystyk, Jan, Vedsted, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3845-9
_version_ 1783283808632569856
author Næser, Esben
Møller, Henrik
Fredberg, Ulrich
Frystyk, Jan
Vedsted, Peter
author_facet Næser, Esben
Møller, Henrik
Fredberg, Ulrich
Frystyk, Jan
Vedsted, Peter
author_sort Næser, Esben
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Danish cancer patients have lower survival rates than patients in many other western countries. Half of the patients present with non-alarm symptoms and thus have a long diagnostic pathway. Consequently, an urgent referral pathway for patients with non-specific serious symptoms was implemented throughout Denmark in 2011–2012. As part of the diagnostic workup, a panel of blood tests are performed for all patients referred by their general practitioner (GP) to the urgent referral pathway. In this study, we analysed the probability of being diagnosed with cancer in GP-referred patients with abnormal blood test results. METHOD: We performed a cohort study that included all patients aged 18 years or older referred by their GP to Silkeborg Regional Hospital for analysis of a panel of blood tests. All patients were followed for 3 months for a cancer diagnosis in the Danish Cancer Registry. The likelihood ratio and post-test probability of subsequently finding cancer were calculated in relation to abnormal blood test results. RESULTS: Among the 1499 patients included in the study, 12.2% were subsequently diagnosed with cancer. The probability of cancer increased with the number of abnormal blood tests. Patients with specific combinations of two abnormal blood tests had a 23–62% probability of cancer. Only a few single abnormal blood tests were linked with a high post-test probability of cancer, and most abnormalities were not specific to cancer. CONCLUSIONS: A number of specific abnormal blood tests and combinations of abnormal blood tests markedly increased the probability of cancer being diagnosed. Still, abnormal blood test results should be interpreted cautiously as most are non-specific to cancer. Thus, results from the blood test panel may strengthen the suspicion of cancer, but blood tests cannot be used as a stand-alone tool to rule out cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3845-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5715646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57156462017-12-08 Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study Næser, Esben Møller, Henrik Fredberg, Ulrich Frystyk, Jan Vedsted, Peter BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Danish cancer patients have lower survival rates than patients in many other western countries. Half of the patients present with non-alarm symptoms and thus have a long diagnostic pathway. Consequently, an urgent referral pathway for patients with non-specific serious symptoms was implemented throughout Denmark in 2011–2012. As part of the diagnostic workup, a panel of blood tests are performed for all patients referred by their general practitioner (GP) to the urgent referral pathway. In this study, we analysed the probability of being diagnosed with cancer in GP-referred patients with abnormal blood test results. METHOD: We performed a cohort study that included all patients aged 18 years or older referred by their GP to Silkeborg Regional Hospital for analysis of a panel of blood tests. All patients were followed for 3 months for a cancer diagnosis in the Danish Cancer Registry. The likelihood ratio and post-test probability of subsequently finding cancer were calculated in relation to abnormal blood test results. RESULTS: Among the 1499 patients included in the study, 12.2% were subsequently diagnosed with cancer. The probability of cancer increased with the number of abnormal blood tests. Patients with specific combinations of two abnormal blood tests had a 23–62% probability of cancer. Only a few single abnormal blood tests were linked with a high post-test probability of cancer, and most abnormalities were not specific to cancer. CONCLUSIONS: A number of specific abnormal blood tests and combinations of abnormal blood tests markedly increased the probability of cancer being diagnosed. Still, abnormal blood test results should be interpreted cautiously as most are non-specific to cancer. Thus, results from the blood test panel may strengthen the suspicion of cancer, but blood tests cannot be used as a stand-alone tool to rule out cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3845-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5715646/ /pubmed/29202799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3845-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Næser, Esben
Møller, Henrik
Fredberg, Ulrich
Frystyk, Jan
Vedsted, Peter
Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study
title Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study
title_full Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study
title_fullStr Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study
title_short Routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study
title_sort routine blood tests and probability of cancer in patients referred with non-specific serious symptoms: a cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3845-9
work_keys_str_mv AT næseresben routinebloodtestsandprobabilityofcancerinpatientsreferredwithnonspecificserioussymptomsacohortstudy
AT møllerhenrik routinebloodtestsandprobabilityofcancerinpatientsreferredwithnonspecificserioussymptomsacohortstudy
AT fredbergulrich routinebloodtestsandprobabilityofcancerinpatientsreferredwithnonspecificserioussymptomsacohortstudy
AT frystykjan routinebloodtestsandprobabilityofcancerinpatientsreferredwithnonspecificserioussymptomsacohortstudy
AT vedstedpeter routinebloodtestsandprobabilityofcancerinpatientsreferredwithnonspecificserioussymptomsacohortstudy