Cargando…
Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review
Peer review may be “single-blind,” in which reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of paper authors, or “double-blind,” in which this information is hidden. Noting that computer science research often appears first or exclusively in peer-reviewed conferences rather than journals, we study...
Autores principales: | Tomkins, Andrew, Zhang, Min, Heavlin, William D. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707323114 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Nobel and novice: Author prominence affects peer review
por: Huber, Jürgen, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review
por: Parmanne, Piitu, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?
por: Moylan, Elizabeth C, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Is novel research worth doing? Evidence from peer review at 49 journals
por: Teplitskiy, Misha, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
On the number of trials needed to distinguish similar alternatives
por: Chierichetti, Flavio, et al.
Publicado: (2022)