Cargando…

Effects of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective two‐centers study

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of fertility preservation (FP) and the impact of chemotherapy on the reproductive potential of Japanese patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Sixty‐two patients with breast cancer visited the authors’ centers from October, 2003 to June, 2015. They were divided into tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashimoto, Tomoko, Nakamura, Yusuke, Obata, Ryuichiro, Doshida, Masakazu, Toya, Mayumi, Takeuchi, Takumi, Kyono, Koichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12054
_version_ 1783283835810611200
author Hashimoto, Tomoko
Nakamura, Yusuke
Obata, Ryuichiro
Doshida, Masakazu
Toya, Mayumi
Takeuchi, Takumi
Kyono, Koichi
author_facet Hashimoto, Tomoko
Nakamura, Yusuke
Obata, Ryuichiro
Doshida, Masakazu
Toya, Mayumi
Takeuchi, Takumi
Kyono, Koichi
author_sort Hashimoto, Tomoko
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of fertility preservation (FP) and the impact of chemotherapy on the reproductive potential of Japanese patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Sixty‐two patients with breast cancer visited the authors’ centers from October, 2003 to June, 2015. They were divided into two groups according to the treatment: oocyte or embryo vitrification for FP before cancer treatment (group A) or infertility treatment after cancer treatment (group B). Group B was divided into two subgroups, B1 (no chemotherapy) and B2 (postchemotherapy), in order to analyze the effect of anticancer drugs on ovarian reserves and assisted reproductive technology outcomes. The number of retrieved oocytes, vitrified oocytes or embryos, and pregnancy rates were analyzed and compared: group A compared to group B1 compared to group B2. RESULTS: The patients in groups A and B1 underwent egg collection without any chemotherapy. The numbers of collected oocytes and vitrified embryos were significantly higher in groups A and B1 than in group B2. Nearly 50% of the in vitro fertilization patients who underwent an embryo transfer (ET) became pregnant, including two patients in group A who underwent a vitrified‐warmed ET. Among the pregnant women, 70% did not have chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: For patients with breast cancer, FP with unfertilized oocytes or embryos before chemotherapy seems to be promising for achieving higher pregnancy rates, with no risk of minimal residual disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5715900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57159002017-12-19 Effects of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective two‐centers study Hashimoto, Tomoko Nakamura, Yusuke Obata, Ryuichiro Doshida, Masakazu Toya, Mayumi Takeuchi, Takumi Kyono, Koichi Reprod Med Biol Original Articles PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of fertility preservation (FP) and the impact of chemotherapy on the reproductive potential of Japanese patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Sixty‐two patients with breast cancer visited the authors’ centers from October, 2003 to June, 2015. They were divided into two groups according to the treatment: oocyte or embryo vitrification for FP before cancer treatment (group A) or infertility treatment after cancer treatment (group B). Group B was divided into two subgroups, B1 (no chemotherapy) and B2 (postchemotherapy), in order to analyze the effect of anticancer drugs on ovarian reserves and assisted reproductive technology outcomes. The number of retrieved oocytes, vitrified oocytes or embryos, and pregnancy rates were analyzed and compared: group A compared to group B1 compared to group B2. RESULTS: The patients in groups A and B1 underwent egg collection without any chemotherapy. The numbers of collected oocytes and vitrified embryos were significantly higher in groups A and B1 than in group B2. Nearly 50% of the in vitro fertilization patients who underwent an embryo transfer (ET) became pregnant, including two patients in group A who underwent a vitrified‐warmed ET. Among the pregnant women, 70% did not have chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: For patients with breast cancer, FP with unfertilized oocytes or embryos before chemotherapy seems to be promising for achieving higher pregnancy rates, with no risk of minimal residual disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5715900/ /pubmed/29259491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12054 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hashimoto, Tomoko
Nakamura, Yusuke
Obata, Ryuichiro
Doshida, Masakazu
Toya, Mayumi
Takeuchi, Takumi
Kyono, Koichi
Effects of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective two‐centers study
title Effects of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective two‐centers study
title_full Effects of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective two‐centers study
title_fullStr Effects of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective two‐centers study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective two‐centers study
title_short Effects of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective two‐centers study
title_sort effects of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective two‐centers study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12054
work_keys_str_mv AT hashimototomoko effectsoffertilitypreservationinpatientswithbreastcanceraretrospectivetwocentersstudy
AT nakamurayusuke effectsoffertilitypreservationinpatientswithbreastcanceraretrospectivetwocentersstudy
AT obataryuichiro effectsoffertilitypreservationinpatientswithbreastcanceraretrospectivetwocentersstudy
AT doshidamasakazu effectsoffertilitypreservationinpatientswithbreastcanceraretrospectivetwocentersstudy
AT toyamayumi effectsoffertilitypreservationinpatientswithbreastcanceraretrospectivetwocentersstudy
AT takeuchitakumi effectsoffertilitypreservationinpatientswithbreastcanceraretrospectivetwocentersstudy
AT kyonokoichi effectsoffertilitypreservationinpatientswithbreastcanceraretrospectivetwocentersstudy