Cargando…

Selection bias in clinical stroke trials depending on ability to consent

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are the hallmark of evidence-based medicine, but recruitment is often challenging, especially in stroke trials investigating patients not being able to give informed consent. In some nations, ethics committees will not approve of inclusion in a clinical study via consent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hotter, Benjamin, Ulm, Lena, Hoffmann, Sarah, Katan, Mira, Montaner, Joan, Bustamante, Alejandro, Meisel, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-017-0989-9
_version_ 1783283905935179776
author Hotter, Benjamin
Ulm, Lena
Hoffmann, Sarah
Katan, Mira
Montaner, Joan
Bustamante, Alejandro
Meisel, Andreas
author_facet Hotter, Benjamin
Ulm, Lena
Hoffmann, Sarah
Katan, Mira
Montaner, Joan
Bustamante, Alejandro
Meisel, Andreas
author_sort Hotter, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are the hallmark of evidence-based medicine, but recruitment is often challenging, especially in stroke trials investigating patients not being able to give informed consent. In some nations, ethics committees will not approve of inclusion in a clinical study via consent of a legal representative. The ethical dilemma of including or excluding those patients has not been properly addressed, as there is little data on the effect of stroke characteristics on the ability to give informed consent. METHODS: To examine differences between patients able and unable to consent at inclusion to an acute stroke trial, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of monitoring records from a multicentric interventional trial. These records listed patients who gave informed consent by themselves and those who needed a legal representative to do so. This exemplary STRAWINSKI trial aimed at improving stroke outcome by biomarker-guided antibiotic treatment of stroke associated pneumonia and included patients within 40 h after stroke onset, suffering from MCA infarctions with an NIHSS score > 9 at admission. Standard descriptive and associative statistics were calculated to compare baseline characteristics and outcome measures between patients who were able to consent and those who were not. RESULTS: We identified the person giving consent in 228 out of 229 subjects. Patients with inability to consent were older (p < 0.01), suffered from more left-hemispheric (p < 0.01) and more severe strokes (NIHSS, p < 0.01), were more likely to die during hospitalisation (p < 0.01) or have unfavourable outcome at discharge (mRS, p < 0.01), to develop fever (p < 0.01) and tended to be more susceptible to infections (p = 0.06) during the acute course of the disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Demographics, stroke characteristics and outcomes significantly affect stroke patients in their ability to consent. Where selection criteria and primary outcome measures of a trial are significantly affected by ability to consent, excluding patients unable to consent might be unethical. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01264549. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12883-017-0989-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5716230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57162302017-12-08 Selection bias in clinical stroke trials depending on ability to consent Hotter, Benjamin Ulm, Lena Hoffmann, Sarah Katan, Mira Montaner, Joan Bustamante, Alejandro Meisel, Andreas BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are the hallmark of evidence-based medicine, but recruitment is often challenging, especially in stroke trials investigating patients not being able to give informed consent. In some nations, ethics committees will not approve of inclusion in a clinical study via consent of a legal representative. The ethical dilemma of including or excluding those patients has not been properly addressed, as there is little data on the effect of stroke characteristics on the ability to give informed consent. METHODS: To examine differences between patients able and unable to consent at inclusion to an acute stroke trial, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of monitoring records from a multicentric interventional trial. These records listed patients who gave informed consent by themselves and those who needed a legal representative to do so. This exemplary STRAWINSKI trial aimed at improving stroke outcome by biomarker-guided antibiotic treatment of stroke associated pneumonia and included patients within 40 h after stroke onset, suffering from MCA infarctions with an NIHSS score > 9 at admission. Standard descriptive and associative statistics were calculated to compare baseline characteristics and outcome measures between patients who were able to consent and those who were not. RESULTS: We identified the person giving consent in 228 out of 229 subjects. Patients with inability to consent were older (p < 0.01), suffered from more left-hemispheric (p < 0.01) and more severe strokes (NIHSS, p < 0.01), were more likely to die during hospitalisation (p < 0.01) or have unfavourable outcome at discharge (mRS, p < 0.01), to develop fever (p < 0.01) and tended to be more susceptible to infections (p = 0.06) during the acute course of the disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Demographics, stroke characteristics and outcomes significantly affect stroke patients in their ability to consent. Where selection criteria and primary outcome measures of a trial are significantly affected by ability to consent, excluding patients unable to consent might be unethical. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01264549. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12883-017-0989-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5716230/ /pubmed/29202730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-017-0989-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hotter, Benjamin
Ulm, Lena
Hoffmann, Sarah
Katan, Mira
Montaner, Joan
Bustamante, Alejandro
Meisel, Andreas
Selection bias in clinical stroke trials depending on ability to consent
title Selection bias in clinical stroke trials depending on ability to consent
title_full Selection bias in clinical stroke trials depending on ability to consent
title_fullStr Selection bias in clinical stroke trials depending on ability to consent
title_full_unstemmed Selection bias in clinical stroke trials depending on ability to consent
title_short Selection bias in clinical stroke trials depending on ability to consent
title_sort selection bias in clinical stroke trials depending on ability to consent
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-017-0989-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hotterbenjamin selectionbiasinclinicalstroketrialsdependingonabilitytoconsent
AT ulmlena selectionbiasinclinicalstroketrialsdependingonabilitytoconsent
AT hoffmannsarah selectionbiasinclinicalstroketrialsdependingonabilitytoconsent
AT katanmira selectionbiasinclinicalstroketrialsdependingonabilitytoconsent
AT montanerjoan selectionbiasinclinicalstroketrialsdependingonabilitytoconsent
AT bustamantealejandro selectionbiasinclinicalstroketrialsdependingonabilitytoconsent
AT meiselandreas selectionbiasinclinicalstroketrialsdependingonabilitytoconsent