Cargando…

The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to evaluate the ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations (LVEDVV) measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) compared with stroke volume variation (SVV) obtained by the FloTrac/Vigileo monitor to predict fluid responsiveness, in patients un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lan, Haidan, Zhou, Xiaoshuang, Xue, Jing, Liu, Bin, Chen, Guo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0456-6
_version_ 1783283910322421760
author Lan, Haidan
Zhou, Xiaoshuang
Xue, Jing
Liu, Bin
Chen, Guo
author_facet Lan, Haidan
Zhou, Xiaoshuang
Xue, Jing
Liu, Bin
Chen, Guo
author_sort Lan, Haidan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to evaluate the ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations (LVEDVV) measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) compared with stroke volume variation (SVV) obtained by the FloTrac/Vigileo monitor to predict fluid responsiveness, in patients undergoing craniotomy with goal direct therapy. METHODS: We used SVV obtained by the FloTrac/Vigileo monitor to manage intraoperative hypotension in adult patients undergoing craniotomy (ASA III – IV) after obtaining IRB approval and informed consent. The LVEDVV were measured by TEE through the changes of left ventricular short diameter of axle simultaneously. When cardiac index (CI) ≤ 2.5 and SVV ≥ 15%, comparisons were made between the two devices before and after volume expansion. RESULTS: We enrolled twenty-six patients referred for craniotomy in this study and 145 pairs of data were obtained. Mean Vigileo-SVV and TEE-LVEDVV were 17.8 ± 2.78% and 22.1 ± 7.25% before volume expansion respectively, and were 10.95 ± 2.8% and 13.58 ± 3.78% after volume expansion respectively (P < 0.001). The relationship between Vigileo-SVV and TEE-LVEDVV was significant (r2 = 0.55; p < 0.001). Agreement between Vigileo-SVV and TEE-LVEDVV was 3.3% ± 3.9% (mean bias ± SD, Bland-Altman). CONCLUSIONS: For fluid responsiveness of patients during craniotomy in ASA III-IV, LVEDVV measured by left ventricular short diameter of axle using M type echocaidiographic measurement seems an acceptable monitoring indicator. This accessible method has promising clinical applications in situations where volume and cardiac function monitoring is of great importance during surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-TRC-13003583, August 20, 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5716247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57162472017-12-08 The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study Lan, Haidan Zhou, Xiaoshuang Xue, Jing Liu, Bin Chen, Guo BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to evaluate the ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations (LVEDVV) measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) compared with stroke volume variation (SVV) obtained by the FloTrac/Vigileo monitor to predict fluid responsiveness, in patients undergoing craniotomy with goal direct therapy. METHODS: We used SVV obtained by the FloTrac/Vigileo monitor to manage intraoperative hypotension in adult patients undergoing craniotomy (ASA III – IV) after obtaining IRB approval and informed consent. The LVEDVV were measured by TEE through the changes of left ventricular short diameter of axle simultaneously. When cardiac index (CI) ≤ 2.5 and SVV ≥ 15%, comparisons were made between the two devices before and after volume expansion. RESULTS: We enrolled twenty-six patients referred for craniotomy in this study and 145 pairs of data were obtained. Mean Vigileo-SVV and TEE-LVEDVV were 17.8 ± 2.78% and 22.1 ± 7.25% before volume expansion respectively, and were 10.95 ± 2.8% and 13.58 ± 3.78% after volume expansion respectively (P < 0.001). The relationship between Vigileo-SVV and TEE-LVEDVV was significant (r2 = 0.55; p < 0.001). Agreement between Vigileo-SVV and TEE-LVEDVV was 3.3% ± 3.9% (mean bias ± SD, Bland-Altman). CONCLUSIONS: For fluid responsiveness of patients during craniotomy in ASA III-IV, LVEDVV measured by left ventricular short diameter of axle using M type echocaidiographic measurement seems an acceptable monitoring indicator. This accessible method has promising clinical applications in situations where volume and cardiac function monitoring is of great importance during surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-TRC-13003583, August 20, 2013. BioMed Central 2017-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5716247/ /pubmed/29202703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0456-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lan, Haidan
Zhou, Xiaoshuang
Xue, Jing
Liu, Bin
Chen, Guo
The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
title The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
title_full The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
title_short The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
title_sort ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by tee to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0456-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lanhaidan theabilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT zhouxiaoshuang theabilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT xuejing theabilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT liubin theabilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT chenguo theabilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT lanhaidan abilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT zhouxiaoshuang abilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT xuejing abilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT liubin abilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT chenguo abilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy