Cargando…

Influence of different sample preparation strategies on the proteomic identification of stress biomarkers in porcine saliva

BACKGROUND: The influence of two different sample treatments comprising the enrichment of glycoproteins by boronic acid and dynamic range compression by hexapeptide libraries, on the detection of stress markers in saliva of pigs was evaluated in this study. For this purpose, saliva samples collected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gutiérrez, Ana, Cerón, José Joaquín, Razzazi-Fazeli, Ebrahim, Schlosser, Sarah, Tecles, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1296-9
_version_ 1783283936200228864
author Gutiérrez, Ana
Cerón, José Joaquín
Razzazi-Fazeli, Ebrahim
Schlosser, Sarah
Tecles, Fernando
author_facet Gutiérrez, Ana
Cerón, José Joaquín
Razzazi-Fazeli, Ebrahim
Schlosser, Sarah
Tecles, Fernando
author_sort Gutiérrez, Ana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The influence of two different sample treatments comprising the enrichment of glycoproteins by boronic acid and dynamic range compression by hexapeptide libraries, on the detection of stress markers in saliva of pigs was evaluated in this study. For this purpose, saliva samples collected before and after the application of an acute stress model consisting of nasal restraining in pigs were processed without any treatment and with the two different treatments mentioned above. Protein separation by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) followed by identification of proteins using MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry (MS) was used as proteomic technique. RESULTS: The application of each of the two different sample treatment protocols allowed the identification of unique proteins that could be potential salivary acute stress markers in pigs: lipocalin 1, protein S100-A8 and immunoglobulin M by enrichment of glycoproteins; protein S100-A9, double headed protease inhibitor submandibular gland, and haemoglobin by dynamic range compression; and protein S100-A12 by both protocols. Salivary lipocalin, prolactin inducible protein, light chain of immunoglobulins, adenosine deaminase and carbonic anhydrase VI were identified as potential markers in untreated saliva as well as one of the other treatments. CONCLUSION: The use of different procedures allowed the detection of different potential stress markers. Although from a practical point of view, the use of saliva without further treatment as well as the enrichment of glycoproteins are less expensive and easy to do procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5716369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57163692017-12-08 Influence of different sample preparation strategies on the proteomic identification of stress biomarkers in porcine saliva Gutiérrez, Ana Cerón, José Joaquín Razzazi-Fazeli, Ebrahim Schlosser, Sarah Tecles, Fernando BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The influence of two different sample treatments comprising the enrichment of glycoproteins by boronic acid and dynamic range compression by hexapeptide libraries, on the detection of stress markers in saliva of pigs was evaluated in this study. For this purpose, saliva samples collected before and after the application of an acute stress model consisting of nasal restraining in pigs were processed without any treatment and with the two different treatments mentioned above. Protein separation by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) followed by identification of proteins using MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry (MS) was used as proteomic technique. RESULTS: The application of each of the two different sample treatment protocols allowed the identification of unique proteins that could be potential salivary acute stress markers in pigs: lipocalin 1, protein S100-A8 and immunoglobulin M by enrichment of glycoproteins; protein S100-A9, double headed protease inhibitor submandibular gland, and haemoglobin by dynamic range compression; and protein S100-A12 by both protocols. Salivary lipocalin, prolactin inducible protein, light chain of immunoglobulins, adenosine deaminase and carbonic anhydrase VI were identified as potential markers in untreated saliva as well as one of the other treatments. CONCLUSION: The use of different procedures allowed the detection of different potential stress markers. Although from a practical point of view, the use of saliva without further treatment as well as the enrichment of glycoproteins are less expensive and easy to do procedures. BioMed Central 2017-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5716369/ /pubmed/29202764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1296-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gutiérrez, Ana
Cerón, José Joaquín
Razzazi-Fazeli, Ebrahim
Schlosser, Sarah
Tecles, Fernando
Influence of different sample preparation strategies on the proteomic identification of stress biomarkers in porcine saliva
title Influence of different sample preparation strategies on the proteomic identification of stress biomarkers in porcine saliva
title_full Influence of different sample preparation strategies on the proteomic identification of stress biomarkers in porcine saliva
title_fullStr Influence of different sample preparation strategies on the proteomic identification of stress biomarkers in porcine saliva
title_full_unstemmed Influence of different sample preparation strategies on the proteomic identification of stress biomarkers in porcine saliva
title_short Influence of different sample preparation strategies on the proteomic identification of stress biomarkers in porcine saliva
title_sort influence of different sample preparation strategies on the proteomic identification of stress biomarkers in porcine saliva
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1296-9
work_keys_str_mv AT gutierrezana influenceofdifferentsamplepreparationstrategiesontheproteomicidentificationofstressbiomarkersinporcinesaliva
AT ceronjosejoaquin influenceofdifferentsamplepreparationstrategiesontheproteomicidentificationofstressbiomarkersinporcinesaliva
AT razzazifazeliebrahim influenceofdifferentsamplepreparationstrategiesontheproteomicidentificationofstressbiomarkersinporcinesaliva
AT schlossersarah influenceofdifferentsamplepreparationstrategiesontheproteomicidentificationofstressbiomarkersinporcinesaliva
AT teclesfernando influenceofdifferentsamplepreparationstrategiesontheproteomicidentificationofstressbiomarkersinporcinesaliva