Cargando…
Sensitivity analysis of an asymmetric Monte Carlo beam model of a Siemens PRIMUS accelerator
The assumption of cylindrical symmetry in radiotherapy accelerator models can pose a challenge for precise Monte Carlo modeling. This assumption makes it difficult to account for measured asymmetries in clinical dose distributions. We have performed a sensitivity study examining the effect of varyin...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22402376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3402 |
_version_ | 1783283948085837824 |
---|---|
author | Schreiber, Eric C. Sawkey, Daren L. Faddegon, Bruce A. |
author_facet | Schreiber, Eric C. Sawkey, Daren L. Faddegon, Bruce A. |
author_sort | Schreiber, Eric C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The assumption of cylindrical symmetry in radiotherapy accelerator models can pose a challenge for precise Monte Carlo modeling. This assumption makes it difficult to account for measured asymmetries in clinical dose distributions. We have performed a sensitivity study examining the effect of varying symmetric and asymmetric beam and geometric parameters of a Monte Carlo model for a Siemens PRIMUS accelerator. The accelerator and dose output were simulated using modified versions of BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc that allow lateral offsets of accelerator components and lateral and angular offsets for the incident electron beam. Dose distributions were studied for [Formula: see text] fields. The resulting dose distributions were analyzed for changes in flatness, symmetry, and off‐axis ratio (OAR). The electron beam parameters having the greatest effect on the resulting dose distributions were found to be electron energy and angle of incidence, as high as 5% for a 0.25° deflection. Electron spot size and lateral offset of the electron beam were found to have a smaller impact. Variations in photon target thickness were found to have a small effect. Small lateral offsets of the flattening filter caused significant variation to the OAR. In general, the greatest sensitivity to accelerator parameters could be observed for higher energies and off‐axis ratios closer to the central axis. Lateral and angular offsets of beam and accelerator components have strong effects on dose distributions, and should be included in any high‐accuracy beam model. PACS numbers: 87.55.K‐, 87.55.Gh |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5716413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57164132018-04-02 Sensitivity analysis of an asymmetric Monte Carlo beam model of a Siemens PRIMUS accelerator Schreiber, Eric C. Sawkey, Daren L. Faddegon, Bruce A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The assumption of cylindrical symmetry in radiotherapy accelerator models can pose a challenge for precise Monte Carlo modeling. This assumption makes it difficult to account for measured asymmetries in clinical dose distributions. We have performed a sensitivity study examining the effect of varying symmetric and asymmetric beam and geometric parameters of a Monte Carlo model for a Siemens PRIMUS accelerator. The accelerator and dose output were simulated using modified versions of BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc that allow lateral offsets of accelerator components and lateral and angular offsets for the incident electron beam. Dose distributions were studied for [Formula: see text] fields. The resulting dose distributions were analyzed for changes in flatness, symmetry, and off‐axis ratio (OAR). The electron beam parameters having the greatest effect on the resulting dose distributions were found to be electron energy and angle of incidence, as high as 5% for a 0.25° deflection. Electron spot size and lateral offset of the electron beam were found to have a smaller impact. Variations in photon target thickness were found to have a small effect. Small lateral offsets of the flattening filter caused significant variation to the OAR. In general, the greatest sensitivity to accelerator parameters could be observed for higher energies and off‐axis ratios closer to the central axis. Lateral and angular offsets of beam and accelerator components have strong effects on dose distributions, and should be included in any high‐accuracy beam model. PACS numbers: 87.55.K‐, 87.55.Gh John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5716413/ /pubmed/22402376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3402 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Schreiber, Eric C. Sawkey, Daren L. Faddegon, Bruce A. Sensitivity analysis of an asymmetric Monte Carlo beam model of a Siemens PRIMUS accelerator |
title | Sensitivity analysis of an asymmetric Monte Carlo beam model of a Siemens PRIMUS accelerator |
title_full | Sensitivity analysis of an asymmetric Monte Carlo beam model of a Siemens PRIMUS accelerator |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity analysis of an asymmetric Monte Carlo beam model of a Siemens PRIMUS accelerator |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity analysis of an asymmetric Monte Carlo beam model of a Siemens PRIMUS accelerator |
title_short | Sensitivity analysis of an asymmetric Monte Carlo beam model of a Siemens PRIMUS accelerator |
title_sort | sensitivity analysis of an asymmetric monte carlo beam model of a siemens primus accelerator |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22402376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3402 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schreiberericc sensitivityanalysisofanasymmetricmontecarlobeammodelofasiemensprimusaccelerator AT sawkeydarenl sensitivityanalysisofanasymmetricmontecarlobeammodelofasiemensprimusaccelerator AT faddegonbrucea sensitivityanalysisofanasymmetricmontecarlobeammodelofasiemensprimusaccelerator |