Cargando…

The extent and serial pattern of interfractional variation in patients with whole pelvic irradiation: a study using a kilovoltage orthogonal on‐board imager

The purpose of this study is to assess the extent and serial pattern of setup error of conventional fractionated whole pelvic irradiation using a kilovoltage on‐board imager. The daily on‐board images of 69 patients were matched with the digitally reconstructed radiographs of simulation on the basis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoon, Won Sup, Yang, Dae Sik, Lee, Jung Ae, Lee, Suk, Park, Young Je, Kim, Chul Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22402382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3636
Descripción
Sumario:The purpose of this study is to assess the extent and serial pattern of setup error of conventional fractionated whole pelvic irradiation using a kilovoltage on‐board imager. The daily on‐board images of 69 patients were matched with the digitally reconstructed radiographs of simulation on the basis of pelvic bony structure. The shifts along x‐ (lateral), y‐ (longitudinal), and z‐ (vertical) axes, and the 3D vector, were measured. The shift between an origin of the first fraction and each fraction [Formula: see text] and the shift between an isocenter of simulation and each fraction [Formula: see text] were calculated. To evaluate serial changes, the shifts of each fraction were classified into four consecutive sessions, and an ANOVA and chi‐square test were used. The systematic error of the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were 2.72 and 1.43 mm along the x‐axis, 2.98 and 1.28 mm along the y‐axis, and 4.26 and 2.39 mm along the z‐axis, respectively. The [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] of the 3D vector occurred in 54.3% and 23.1%, respectively. The recommended margins to cover setup error in case of using [Formula: see text] were 3.81, 3.54, and 6.01 mm along x‐, y‐, and z‐axes, whereas those using [Formula: see text] were 6.39, 6.95, and 9.95 mm, respectively. With the passage of time, the [Formula: see text] of 3D vector and along any axis in supine setup increased from 14.1% for first session to 22.5% for fourth session [Formula: see text] and from 10.8% to 18.5% [Formula: see text] , respectively. In prone setup, first session was better than others in the [Formula: see text] of 3D vector and along any axis. It is expected that the correction using the on‐board images on the first fraction improves geometrical uncertainties and reduces the margin for target coverage. Daily continuous OBI follow‐up during conventional fractionated pelvic irradiation can increase the reproducibility and be more effective in the late period. PACS number: 87.55.km