Cargando…

The extent and serial pattern of interfractional variation in patients with whole pelvic irradiation: a study using a kilovoltage orthogonal on‐board imager

The purpose of this study is to assess the extent and serial pattern of setup error of conventional fractionated whole pelvic irradiation using a kilovoltage on‐board imager. The daily on‐board images of 69 patients were matched with the digitally reconstructed radiographs of simulation on the basis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoon, Won Sup, Yang, Dae Sik, Lee, Jung Ae, Lee, Suk, Park, Young Je, Kim, Chul Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22402382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3636
_version_ 1783283948574474240
author Yoon, Won Sup
Yang, Dae Sik
Lee, Jung Ae
Lee, Suk
Park, Young Je
Kim, Chul Yong
author_facet Yoon, Won Sup
Yang, Dae Sik
Lee, Jung Ae
Lee, Suk
Park, Young Je
Kim, Chul Yong
author_sort Yoon, Won Sup
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to assess the extent and serial pattern of setup error of conventional fractionated whole pelvic irradiation using a kilovoltage on‐board imager. The daily on‐board images of 69 patients were matched with the digitally reconstructed radiographs of simulation on the basis of pelvic bony structure. The shifts along x‐ (lateral), y‐ (longitudinal), and z‐ (vertical) axes, and the 3D vector, were measured. The shift between an origin of the first fraction and each fraction [Formula: see text] and the shift between an isocenter of simulation and each fraction [Formula: see text] were calculated. To evaluate serial changes, the shifts of each fraction were classified into four consecutive sessions, and an ANOVA and chi‐square test were used. The systematic error of the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were 2.72 and 1.43 mm along the x‐axis, 2.98 and 1.28 mm along the y‐axis, and 4.26 and 2.39 mm along the z‐axis, respectively. The [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] of the 3D vector occurred in 54.3% and 23.1%, respectively. The recommended margins to cover setup error in case of using [Formula: see text] were 3.81, 3.54, and 6.01 mm along x‐, y‐, and z‐axes, whereas those using [Formula: see text] were 6.39, 6.95, and 9.95 mm, respectively. With the passage of time, the [Formula: see text] of 3D vector and along any axis in supine setup increased from 14.1% for first session to 22.5% for fourth session [Formula: see text] and from 10.8% to 18.5% [Formula: see text] , respectively. In prone setup, first session was better than others in the [Formula: see text] of 3D vector and along any axis. It is expected that the correction using the on‐board images on the first fraction improves geometrical uncertainties and reduces the margin for target coverage. Daily continuous OBI follow‐up during conventional fractionated pelvic irradiation can increase the reproducibility and be more effective in the late period. PACS number: 87.55.km
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5716416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57164162018-04-02 The extent and serial pattern of interfractional variation in patients with whole pelvic irradiation: a study using a kilovoltage orthogonal on‐board imager Yoon, Won Sup Yang, Dae Sik Lee, Jung Ae Lee, Suk Park, Young Je Kim, Chul Yong J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study is to assess the extent and serial pattern of setup error of conventional fractionated whole pelvic irradiation using a kilovoltage on‐board imager. The daily on‐board images of 69 patients were matched with the digitally reconstructed radiographs of simulation on the basis of pelvic bony structure. The shifts along x‐ (lateral), y‐ (longitudinal), and z‐ (vertical) axes, and the 3D vector, were measured. The shift between an origin of the first fraction and each fraction [Formula: see text] and the shift between an isocenter of simulation and each fraction [Formula: see text] were calculated. To evaluate serial changes, the shifts of each fraction were classified into four consecutive sessions, and an ANOVA and chi‐square test were used. The systematic error of the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were 2.72 and 1.43 mm along the x‐axis, 2.98 and 1.28 mm along the y‐axis, and 4.26 and 2.39 mm along the z‐axis, respectively. The [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] of the 3D vector occurred in 54.3% and 23.1%, respectively. The recommended margins to cover setup error in case of using [Formula: see text] were 3.81, 3.54, and 6.01 mm along x‐, y‐, and z‐axes, whereas those using [Formula: see text] were 6.39, 6.95, and 9.95 mm, respectively. With the passage of time, the [Formula: see text] of 3D vector and along any axis in supine setup increased from 14.1% for first session to 22.5% for fourth session [Formula: see text] and from 10.8% to 18.5% [Formula: see text] , respectively. In prone setup, first session was better than others in the [Formula: see text] of 3D vector and along any axis. It is expected that the correction using the on‐board images on the first fraction improves geometrical uncertainties and reduces the margin for target coverage. Daily continuous OBI follow‐up during conventional fractionated pelvic irradiation can increase the reproducibility and be more effective in the late period. PACS number: 87.55.km John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5716416/ /pubmed/22402382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3636 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Yoon, Won Sup
Yang, Dae Sik
Lee, Jung Ae
Lee, Suk
Park, Young Je
Kim, Chul Yong
The extent and serial pattern of interfractional variation in patients with whole pelvic irradiation: a study using a kilovoltage orthogonal on‐board imager
title The extent and serial pattern of interfractional variation in patients with whole pelvic irradiation: a study using a kilovoltage orthogonal on‐board imager
title_full The extent and serial pattern of interfractional variation in patients with whole pelvic irradiation: a study using a kilovoltage orthogonal on‐board imager
title_fullStr The extent and serial pattern of interfractional variation in patients with whole pelvic irradiation: a study using a kilovoltage orthogonal on‐board imager
title_full_unstemmed The extent and serial pattern of interfractional variation in patients with whole pelvic irradiation: a study using a kilovoltage orthogonal on‐board imager
title_short The extent and serial pattern of interfractional variation in patients with whole pelvic irradiation: a study using a kilovoltage orthogonal on‐board imager
title_sort extent and serial pattern of interfractional variation in patients with whole pelvic irradiation: a study using a kilovoltage orthogonal on‐board imager
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22402382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3636
work_keys_str_mv AT yoonwonsup theextentandserialpatternofinterfractionalvariationinpatientswithwholepelvicirradiationastudyusingakilovoltageorthogonalonboardimager
AT yangdaesik theextentandserialpatternofinterfractionalvariationinpatientswithwholepelvicirradiationastudyusingakilovoltageorthogonalonboardimager
AT leejungae theextentandserialpatternofinterfractionalvariationinpatientswithwholepelvicirradiationastudyusingakilovoltageorthogonalonboardimager
AT leesuk theextentandserialpatternofinterfractionalvariationinpatientswithwholepelvicirradiationastudyusingakilovoltageorthogonalonboardimager
AT parkyoungje theextentandserialpatternofinterfractionalvariationinpatientswithwholepelvicirradiationastudyusingakilovoltageorthogonalonboardimager
AT kimchulyong theextentandserialpatternofinterfractionalvariationinpatientswithwholepelvicirradiationastudyusingakilovoltageorthogonalonboardimager
AT yoonwonsup extentandserialpatternofinterfractionalvariationinpatientswithwholepelvicirradiationastudyusingakilovoltageorthogonalonboardimager
AT yangdaesik extentandserialpatternofinterfractionalvariationinpatientswithwholepelvicirradiationastudyusingakilovoltageorthogonalonboardimager
AT leejungae extentandserialpatternofinterfractionalvariationinpatientswithwholepelvicirradiationastudyusingakilovoltageorthogonalonboardimager
AT leesuk extentandserialpatternofinterfractionalvariationinpatientswithwholepelvicirradiationastudyusingakilovoltageorthogonalonboardimager
AT parkyoungje extentandserialpatternofinterfractionalvariationinpatientswithwholepelvicirradiationastudyusingakilovoltageorthogonalonboardimager
AT kimchulyong extentandserialpatternofinterfractionalvariationinpatientswithwholepelvicirradiationastudyusingakilovoltageorthogonalonboardimager