Cargando…

The effects of motion on the dose distribution of proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer

Proton radiotherapy of the prostate basal or whole seminal vesicles using scattering delivery systems is an effective treatment of prostate cancer that has been evaluated in prospective trials. Meanwhile, the use of pencil beam scanning (PBS) can further reduce the dose in the beam entrance channels...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qamhiyeh, Sima, Geismar, Dirk, Pöttgen, Christoph, Stuschke, Martin, Farr, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22584166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i3.3639
_version_ 1783283971423993856
author Qamhiyeh, Sima
Geismar, Dirk
Pöttgen, Christoph
Stuschke, Martin
Farr, Jonathan
author_facet Qamhiyeh, Sima
Geismar, Dirk
Pöttgen, Christoph
Stuschke, Martin
Farr, Jonathan
author_sort Qamhiyeh, Sima
collection PubMed
description Proton radiotherapy of the prostate basal or whole seminal vesicles using scattering delivery systems is an effective treatment of prostate cancer that has been evaluated in prospective trials. Meanwhile, the use of pencil beam scanning (PBS) can further reduce the dose in the beam entrance channels and reduce the dose to the normal tissues. However, PBS dose distributions can be affected by intra‐ and interfractional motion. In this treatment planning study, the effects of intra‐ and interfractional organ motion on PBS dose distributions are investigated using repeated CT scans at close and distant time intervals. The minimum dose ([Formula: see text]) and the dose to 2% and 98% of the volumes ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]), as well as EUD in the clinical target volumes (CTV), is used as measure of robustness. In all patients, [Formula: see text] was larger than 96% and [Formula: see text] was less than 106% of the prescribed dose. The combined information from [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and EUD led to the conclusion that there are no relevant cold spots observed in any of the verification plans. Moreover, it was found that results of single field optimization are more robust than results from multiple field optimizations. PACS numbers: 87.55.D‐, 87.55.de, 87.53.Bn, 87.55.dk, 87.55.ne
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5716555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57165552018-04-02 The effects of motion on the dose distribution of proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer Qamhiyeh, Sima Geismar, Dirk Pöttgen, Christoph Stuschke, Martin Farr, Jonathan J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Proton radiotherapy of the prostate basal or whole seminal vesicles using scattering delivery systems is an effective treatment of prostate cancer that has been evaluated in prospective trials. Meanwhile, the use of pencil beam scanning (PBS) can further reduce the dose in the beam entrance channels and reduce the dose to the normal tissues. However, PBS dose distributions can be affected by intra‐ and interfractional motion. In this treatment planning study, the effects of intra‐ and interfractional organ motion on PBS dose distributions are investigated using repeated CT scans at close and distant time intervals. The minimum dose ([Formula: see text]) and the dose to 2% and 98% of the volumes ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]), as well as EUD in the clinical target volumes (CTV), is used as measure of robustness. In all patients, [Formula: see text] was larger than 96% and [Formula: see text] was less than 106% of the prescribed dose. The combined information from [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and EUD led to the conclusion that there are no relevant cold spots observed in any of the verification plans. Moreover, it was found that results of single field optimization are more robust than results from multiple field optimizations. PACS numbers: 87.55.D‐, 87.55.de, 87.53.Bn, 87.55.dk, 87.55.ne John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5716555/ /pubmed/22584166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i3.3639 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Qamhiyeh, Sima
Geismar, Dirk
Pöttgen, Christoph
Stuschke, Martin
Farr, Jonathan
The effects of motion on the dose distribution of proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer
title The effects of motion on the dose distribution of proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer
title_full The effects of motion on the dose distribution of proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer
title_fullStr The effects of motion on the dose distribution of proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed The effects of motion on the dose distribution of proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer
title_short The effects of motion on the dose distribution of proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer
title_sort effects of motion on the dose distribution of proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22584166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i3.3639
work_keys_str_mv AT qamhiyehsima theeffectsofmotiononthedosedistributionofprotonradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT geismardirk theeffectsofmotiononthedosedistributionofprotonradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT pottgenchristoph theeffectsofmotiononthedosedistributionofprotonradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT stuschkemartin theeffectsofmotiononthedosedistributionofprotonradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT farrjonathan theeffectsofmotiononthedosedistributionofprotonradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT qamhiyehsima effectsofmotiononthedosedistributionofprotonradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT geismardirk effectsofmotiononthedosedistributionofprotonradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT pottgenchristoph effectsofmotiononthedosedistributionofprotonradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT stuschkemartin effectsofmotiononthedosedistributionofprotonradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT farrjonathan effectsofmotiononthedosedistributionofprotonradiotherapyforprostatecancer