Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Research Studies Examining Telehealth Privacy and Security Practices used by Healthcare Providers

The objective of this systematic review was to systematically review papers in the United States that examine current practices in privacy and security when telehealth technologies are used by healthcare providers. A literature search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: WATZLAF, VALERIE J. M., ZHOU, LEMING, DEALMEIDA, DILHARI R., HARTMAN, LINDA M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238448
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2017.6231
_version_ 1783283988306067456
author WATZLAF, VALERIE J. M.
ZHOU, LEMING
DEALMEIDA, DILHARI R.
HARTMAN, LINDA M.
author_facet WATZLAF, VALERIE J. M.
ZHOU, LEMING
DEALMEIDA, DILHARI R.
HARTMAN, LINDA M.
author_sort WATZLAF, VALERIE J. M.
collection PubMed
description The objective of this systematic review was to systematically review papers in the United States that examine current practices in privacy and security when telehealth technologies are used by healthcare providers. A literature search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). PubMed, CINAHL and INSPEC from 2003 – 2016 were searched and returned 25,404 papers (after duplications were removed). Inclusion and exclusion criteria were strictly followed to examine title, abstract, and full text for 21 published papers which reported on privacy and security practices used by healthcare providers using telehealth. Data on confidentiality, integrity, privacy, informed consent, access control, availability, retention, encryption, and authentication were all searched and retrieved from the papers examined. Papers were selected by two independent reviewers, first per inclusion/exclusion criteria and, where there was disagreement, a third reviewer was consulted. The percentage of agreement and Cohen’s kappa was 99.04% and 0.7331 respectively. The papers reviewed ranged from 2004 to 2016 and included several types of telehealth specialties. Sixty-seven percent were policy type studies, and 14 percent were survey/interview studies. There were no randomized controlled trials. Based upon the results, we conclude that it is necessary to have more studies with specific information about the use of privacy and security practices when using telehealth technologies as well as studies that examine patient and provider preferences on how data is kept private and secure during and after telehealth sessions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5716616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57166162017-12-13 A Systematic Review of Research Studies Examining Telehealth Privacy and Security Practices used by Healthcare Providers WATZLAF, VALERIE J. M. ZHOU, LEMING DEALMEIDA, DILHARI R. HARTMAN, LINDA M. Int J Telerehabil Systematic Review of Research The objective of this systematic review was to systematically review papers in the United States that examine current practices in privacy and security when telehealth technologies are used by healthcare providers. A literature search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). PubMed, CINAHL and INSPEC from 2003 – 2016 were searched and returned 25,404 papers (after duplications were removed). Inclusion and exclusion criteria were strictly followed to examine title, abstract, and full text for 21 published papers which reported on privacy and security practices used by healthcare providers using telehealth. Data on confidentiality, integrity, privacy, informed consent, access control, availability, retention, encryption, and authentication were all searched and retrieved from the papers examined. Papers were selected by two independent reviewers, first per inclusion/exclusion criteria and, where there was disagreement, a third reviewer was consulted. The percentage of agreement and Cohen’s kappa was 99.04% and 0.7331 respectively. The papers reviewed ranged from 2004 to 2016 and included several types of telehealth specialties. Sixty-seven percent were policy type studies, and 14 percent were survey/interview studies. There were no randomized controlled trials. Based upon the results, we conclude that it is necessary to have more studies with specific information about the use of privacy and security practices when using telehealth technologies as well as studies that examine patient and provider preferences on how data is kept private and secure during and after telehealth sessions. University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2017-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5716616/ /pubmed/29238448 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2017.6231 Text en This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Systematic Review of Research
WATZLAF, VALERIE J. M.
ZHOU, LEMING
DEALMEIDA, DILHARI R.
HARTMAN, LINDA M.
A Systematic Review of Research Studies Examining Telehealth Privacy and Security Practices used by Healthcare Providers
title A Systematic Review of Research Studies Examining Telehealth Privacy and Security Practices used by Healthcare Providers
title_full A Systematic Review of Research Studies Examining Telehealth Privacy and Security Practices used by Healthcare Providers
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Research Studies Examining Telehealth Privacy and Security Practices used by Healthcare Providers
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Research Studies Examining Telehealth Privacy and Security Practices used by Healthcare Providers
title_short A Systematic Review of Research Studies Examining Telehealth Privacy and Security Practices used by Healthcare Providers
title_sort systematic review of research studies examining telehealth privacy and security practices used by healthcare providers
topic Systematic Review of Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238448
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2017.6231
work_keys_str_mv AT watzlafvaleriejm asystematicreviewofresearchstudiesexaminingtelehealthprivacyandsecuritypracticesusedbyhealthcareproviders
AT zhouleming asystematicreviewofresearchstudiesexaminingtelehealthprivacyandsecuritypracticesusedbyhealthcareproviders
AT dealmeidadilharir asystematicreviewofresearchstudiesexaminingtelehealthprivacyandsecuritypracticesusedbyhealthcareproviders
AT hartmanlindam asystematicreviewofresearchstudiesexaminingtelehealthprivacyandsecuritypracticesusedbyhealthcareproviders
AT watzlafvaleriejm systematicreviewofresearchstudiesexaminingtelehealthprivacyandsecuritypracticesusedbyhealthcareproviders
AT zhouleming systematicreviewofresearchstudiesexaminingtelehealthprivacyandsecuritypracticesusedbyhealthcareproviders
AT dealmeidadilharir systematicreviewofresearchstudiesexaminingtelehealthprivacyandsecuritypracticesusedbyhealthcareproviders
AT hartmanlindam systematicreviewofresearchstudiesexaminingtelehealthprivacyandsecuritypracticesusedbyhealthcareproviders