Cargando…

Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND: Proper monitoring of cerebral perfusion during carotid artery surgery is crucial for determining if a shunt is needed. We compared the safety and reliability of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) with transcranial Doppler (TCD) for cerebral monitoring. METHODS: This single-center, retrosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Jun Woo, Jang, Jae Seok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234612
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.6.448
_version_ 1783283991060676608
author Cho, Jun Woo
Jang, Jae Seok
author_facet Cho, Jun Woo
Jang, Jae Seok
author_sort Cho, Jun Woo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proper monitoring of cerebral perfusion during carotid artery surgery is crucial for determining if a shunt is needed. We compared the safety and reliability of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) with transcranial Doppler (TCD) for cerebral monitoring. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using selective shunt-based TCD or NIRS at Daegu Catholic University Medical Center from November 2009 to June 2016. Postoperative complications were the primary outcome, and the distribution of risk factors between the 2 groups was compared. RESULTS: The medical records of 74 patients (45 TCD, 29 NIRS) were reviewed. The demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. One TCD patient died within the 30-day postoperative period. Postoperative stroke (n=4, p=0.15) and neurologic complications (n=10, p=0.005) were only reported in the TCD group. Shunt usage was 44.4% and 10.3% in the TCD and NIRS groups, respectively (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: NIRS-based selective shunting during CEA seems to be safe and reliable for monitoring cerebral perfusion in terms of postoperative stroke and neurologic symptoms. It also reduces unnecessary shunt usage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5716648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57166482017-12-12 Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy Cho, Jun Woo Jang, Jae Seok Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Proper monitoring of cerebral perfusion during carotid artery surgery is crucial for determining if a shunt is needed. We compared the safety and reliability of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) with transcranial Doppler (TCD) for cerebral monitoring. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using selective shunt-based TCD or NIRS at Daegu Catholic University Medical Center from November 2009 to June 2016. Postoperative complications were the primary outcome, and the distribution of risk factors between the 2 groups was compared. RESULTS: The medical records of 74 patients (45 TCD, 29 NIRS) were reviewed. The demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. One TCD patient died within the 30-day postoperative period. Postoperative stroke (n=4, p=0.15) and neurologic complications (n=10, p=0.005) were only reported in the TCD group. Shunt usage was 44.4% and 10.3% in the TCD and NIRS groups, respectively (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: NIRS-based selective shunting during CEA seems to be safe and reliable for monitoring cerebral perfusion in terms of postoperative stroke and neurologic symptoms. It also reduces unnecessary shunt usage. The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2017-12 2017-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5716648/ /pubmed/29234612 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.6.448 Text en Copyright © 2017 by The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. All rights Reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Cho, Jun Woo
Jang, Jae Seok
Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy
title Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy
title_full Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy
title_fullStr Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy
title_short Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy
title_sort near-infrared spectroscopy versus transcranial doppler-based monitoring in carotid endarterectomy
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234612
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.6.448
work_keys_str_mv AT chojunwoo nearinfraredspectroscopyversustranscranialdopplerbasedmonitoringincarotidendarterectomy
AT jangjaeseok nearinfraredspectroscopyversustranscranialdopplerbasedmonitoringincarotidendarterectomy