Cargando…
Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy
BACKGROUND: Proper monitoring of cerebral perfusion during carotid artery surgery is crucial for determining if a shunt is needed. We compared the safety and reliability of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) with transcranial Doppler (TCD) for cerebral monitoring. METHODS: This single-center, retrosp...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234612 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.6.448 |
_version_ | 1783283991060676608 |
---|---|
author | Cho, Jun Woo Jang, Jae Seok |
author_facet | Cho, Jun Woo Jang, Jae Seok |
author_sort | Cho, Jun Woo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Proper monitoring of cerebral perfusion during carotid artery surgery is crucial for determining if a shunt is needed. We compared the safety and reliability of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) with transcranial Doppler (TCD) for cerebral monitoring. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using selective shunt-based TCD or NIRS at Daegu Catholic University Medical Center from November 2009 to June 2016. Postoperative complications were the primary outcome, and the distribution of risk factors between the 2 groups was compared. RESULTS: The medical records of 74 patients (45 TCD, 29 NIRS) were reviewed. The demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. One TCD patient died within the 30-day postoperative period. Postoperative stroke (n=4, p=0.15) and neurologic complications (n=10, p=0.005) were only reported in the TCD group. Shunt usage was 44.4% and 10.3% in the TCD and NIRS groups, respectively (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: NIRS-based selective shunting during CEA seems to be safe and reliable for monitoring cerebral perfusion in terms of postoperative stroke and neurologic symptoms. It also reduces unnecessary shunt usage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5716648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57166482017-12-12 Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy Cho, Jun Woo Jang, Jae Seok Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Proper monitoring of cerebral perfusion during carotid artery surgery is crucial for determining if a shunt is needed. We compared the safety and reliability of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) with transcranial Doppler (TCD) for cerebral monitoring. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using selective shunt-based TCD or NIRS at Daegu Catholic University Medical Center from November 2009 to June 2016. Postoperative complications were the primary outcome, and the distribution of risk factors between the 2 groups was compared. RESULTS: The medical records of 74 patients (45 TCD, 29 NIRS) were reviewed. The demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. One TCD patient died within the 30-day postoperative period. Postoperative stroke (n=4, p=0.15) and neurologic complications (n=10, p=0.005) were only reported in the TCD group. Shunt usage was 44.4% and 10.3% in the TCD and NIRS groups, respectively (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: NIRS-based selective shunting during CEA seems to be safe and reliable for monitoring cerebral perfusion in terms of postoperative stroke and neurologic symptoms. It also reduces unnecessary shunt usage. The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2017-12 2017-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5716648/ /pubmed/29234612 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.6.448 Text en Copyright © 2017 by The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. All rights Reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Cho, Jun Woo Jang, Jae Seok Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy |
title | Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy |
title_full | Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy |
title_fullStr | Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy |
title_short | Near-Infrared Spectroscopy versus Transcranial Doppler-Based Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy |
title_sort | near-infrared spectroscopy versus transcranial doppler-based monitoring in carotid endarterectomy |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234612 http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.6.448 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chojunwoo nearinfraredspectroscopyversustranscranialdopplerbasedmonitoringincarotidendarterectomy AT jangjaeseok nearinfraredspectroscopyversustranscranialdopplerbasedmonitoringincarotidendarterectomy |