Cargando…

Physical Activity as a Vital Sign: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: Physical activity (PA) is strongly endorsed for managing chronic conditions, and a vital sign tool (indicator of general physical condition) could alert providers of inadequate PA to prompt counseling or referral. This systematic review examined the use, definitions, psychometric prope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golightly, Yvonne M., Allen, Kelli D., Ambrose, Kirsten R., Stiller, Jamie L., Evenson, Kelly R., Voisin, Christiane, Hootman, Jennifer M., Callahan, Leigh F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29191260
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd14.170030
_version_ 1783284029965991936
author Golightly, Yvonne M.
Allen, Kelli D.
Ambrose, Kirsten R.
Stiller, Jamie L.
Evenson, Kelly R.
Voisin, Christiane
Hootman, Jennifer M.
Callahan, Leigh F.
author_facet Golightly, Yvonne M.
Allen, Kelli D.
Ambrose, Kirsten R.
Stiller, Jamie L.
Evenson, Kelly R.
Voisin, Christiane
Hootman, Jennifer M.
Callahan, Leigh F.
author_sort Golightly, Yvonne M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Physical activity (PA) is strongly endorsed for managing chronic conditions, and a vital sign tool (indicator of general physical condition) could alert providers of inadequate PA to prompt counseling or referral. This systematic review examined the use, definitions, psychometric properties, and outcomes of brief PA instruments as vital sign measures, with attention primarily to studies focused on arthritis. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for English-language literature from 1985 through 2016 using the terms PA, exercise, vital sign, exercise referral scheme, and exercise counseling. Of the 838 articles identified for title and abstract review, 9 articles qualified for full text review and data extraction. RESULTS: Five brief PA measures were identified: Exercise Vital Sign (EVS), Physical Activity Vital Sign (PAVS), Speedy Nutrition and Physical Activity Assessment (SNAP), General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ), and Stanford Brief Activity Survey (SBAS). Studies focusing on arthritis were not found. Over 1.5 years of using EVS in a large hospital system, improvements occurred in relative weight loss among overweight patients and reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin among diabetic patients. On PAVS, moderate physical activity of 5 or more days per week versus fewer than 5 days per week was associated with a lower body mass index (−2.90 kg/m(2)). Compared with accelerometer-defined physical activity, EVS was weakly correlated (r = 0.27), had low sensitivity (27%–59%), and high specificity (74%–89%); SNAP showed weak agreement (κ = 0.12); GPPAQ had moderate sensitivity (46%) and specificity (50%), and SBAS was weakly correlated (r = 0.10–0.28), had poor to moderate sensitivity (18%–67%), and had moderate specificity (58%–79%). CONCLUSION: Few studies have examined a brief physical activity tool as a vital sign measure. Initial investigations suggest the promise of these simple and quick assessment tools, and research is needed to test the effects of their use on chronic disease outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5716811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57168112017-12-14 Physical Activity as a Vital Sign: A Systematic Review Golightly, Yvonne M. Allen, Kelli D. Ambrose, Kirsten R. Stiller, Jamie L. Evenson, Kelly R. Voisin, Christiane Hootman, Jennifer M. Callahan, Leigh F. Prev Chronic Dis Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: Physical activity (PA) is strongly endorsed for managing chronic conditions, and a vital sign tool (indicator of general physical condition) could alert providers of inadequate PA to prompt counseling or referral. This systematic review examined the use, definitions, psychometric properties, and outcomes of brief PA instruments as vital sign measures, with attention primarily to studies focused on arthritis. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for English-language literature from 1985 through 2016 using the terms PA, exercise, vital sign, exercise referral scheme, and exercise counseling. Of the 838 articles identified for title and abstract review, 9 articles qualified for full text review and data extraction. RESULTS: Five brief PA measures were identified: Exercise Vital Sign (EVS), Physical Activity Vital Sign (PAVS), Speedy Nutrition and Physical Activity Assessment (SNAP), General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ), and Stanford Brief Activity Survey (SBAS). Studies focusing on arthritis were not found. Over 1.5 years of using EVS in a large hospital system, improvements occurred in relative weight loss among overweight patients and reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin among diabetic patients. On PAVS, moderate physical activity of 5 or more days per week versus fewer than 5 days per week was associated with a lower body mass index (−2.90 kg/m(2)). Compared with accelerometer-defined physical activity, EVS was weakly correlated (r = 0.27), had low sensitivity (27%–59%), and high specificity (74%–89%); SNAP showed weak agreement (κ = 0.12); GPPAQ had moderate sensitivity (46%) and specificity (50%), and SBAS was weakly correlated (r = 0.10–0.28), had poor to moderate sensitivity (18%–67%), and had moderate specificity (58%–79%). CONCLUSION: Few studies have examined a brief physical activity tool as a vital sign measure. Initial investigations suggest the promise of these simple and quick assessment tools, and research is needed to test the effects of their use on chronic disease outcomes. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2017-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5716811/ /pubmed/29191260 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd14.170030 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Golightly, Yvonne M.
Allen, Kelli D.
Ambrose, Kirsten R.
Stiller, Jamie L.
Evenson, Kelly R.
Voisin, Christiane
Hootman, Jennifer M.
Callahan, Leigh F.
Physical Activity as a Vital Sign: A Systematic Review
title Physical Activity as a Vital Sign: A Systematic Review
title_full Physical Activity as a Vital Sign: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Physical Activity as a Vital Sign: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Physical Activity as a Vital Sign: A Systematic Review
title_short Physical Activity as a Vital Sign: A Systematic Review
title_sort physical activity as a vital sign: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29191260
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd14.170030
work_keys_str_mv AT golightlyyvonnem physicalactivityasavitalsignasystematicreview
AT allenkellid physicalactivityasavitalsignasystematicreview
AT ambrosekirstenr physicalactivityasavitalsignasystematicreview
AT stillerjamiel physicalactivityasavitalsignasystematicreview
AT evensonkellyr physicalactivityasavitalsignasystematicreview
AT voisinchristiane physicalactivityasavitalsignasystematicreview
AT hootmanjenniferm physicalactivityasavitalsignasystematicreview
AT callahanleighf physicalactivityasavitalsignasystematicreview