Cargando…

Model selection criteria for dynamic brain PET studies

BACKGROUND:  Several criteria exist to identify the optimal model for quantification of tracer kinetics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correspondence in kinetic model preference identification for brain PET studies among five model selection criteria: Akaike Information Criterion (AI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golla, Sandeep S. V., Adriaanse, Sofie M., Yaqub, Maqsood, Windhorst, Albert D., Lammertsma, Adriaan A., van Berckel, Bart N. M., Boellaard, Ronald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29209862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0197-0
_version_ 1783284040861745152
author Golla, Sandeep S. V.
Adriaanse, Sofie M.
Yaqub, Maqsood
Windhorst, Albert D.
Lammertsma, Adriaan A.
van Berckel, Bart N. M.
Boellaard, Ronald
author_facet Golla, Sandeep S. V.
Adriaanse, Sofie M.
Yaqub, Maqsood
Windhorst, Albert D.
Lammertsma, Adriaan A.
van Berckel, Bart N. M.
Boellaard, Ronald
author_sort Golla, Sandeep S. V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND:  Several criteria exist to identify the optimal model for quantification of tracer kinetics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correspondence in kinetic model preference identification for brain PET studies among five model selection criteria: Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), AIC unbiased (AIC(C)), model selection criterion (MSC), Schwartz Criterion (SC), and F-test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six tracers were evaluated: [(11)C]FMZ, [(11)C]GMOM, [(11)C]PK11195, [(11)C]Raclopride, [(18)F]FDG, and [(11)C]PHT, including data from five subjects per tracer. Time activity curves (TACs) were analysed using six plasma input models: reversible single-tissue model (1T2k), irreversible two-tissue model (2T3k), and reversible two-tissue model (2T4k), all with and without blood volume fraction parameter (V (B)). For each tracer and criterion, the percentage of TACs preferring a certain model was calculated. RESULTS: For all radiotracers, strong agreement was seen across the model selection criteria. The F-test was considered as the reference, as it is a frequently used hypothesis test. The F-test confirmed the AIC preferred model in 87% of all cases. The strongest (but minimal) disagreement across regional TACs was found when comparing AIC with AIC(C). Despite these regional discrepancies, same preferred kinetic model was obtained using all criteria, with an exception of one FMZ subject. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, all five model selection criteria resulted in similar conclusions with only minor differences that did not affect overall model selection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40658-017-0197-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5716967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57169672017-12-11 Model selection criteria for dynamic brain PET studies Golla, Sandeep S. V. Adriaanse, Sofie M. Yaqub, Maqsood Windhorst, Albert D. Lammertsma, Adriaan A. van Berckel, Bart N. M. Boellaard, Ronald EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND:  Several criteria exist to identify the optimal model for quantification of tracer kinetics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correspondence in kinetic model preference identification for brain PET studies among five model selection criteria: Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), AIC unbiased (AIC(C)), model selection criterion (MSC), Schwartz Criterion (SC), and F-test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six tracers were evaluated: [(11)C]FMZ, [(11)C]GMOM, [(11)C]PK11195, [(11)C]Raclopride, [(18)F]FDG, and [(11)C]PHT, including data from five subjects per tracer. Time activity curves (TACs) were analysed using six plasma input models: reversible single-tissue model (1T2k), irreversible two-tissue model (2T3k), and reversible two-tissue model (2T4k), all with and without blood volume fraction parameter (V (B)). For each tracer and criterion, the percentage of TACs preferring a certain model was calculated. RESULTS: For all radiotracers, strong agreement was seen across the model selection criteria. The F-test was considered as the reference, as it is a frequently used hypothesis test. The F-test confirmed the AIC preferred model in 87% of all cases. The strongest (but minimal) disagreement across regional TACs was found when comparing AIC with AIC(C). Despite these regional discrepancies, same preferred kinetic model was obtained using all criteria, with an exception of one FMZ subject. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, all five model selection criteria resulted in similar conclusions with only minor differences that did not affect overall model selection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40658-017-0197-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5716967/ /pubmed/29209862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0197-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Golla, Sandeep S. V.
Adriaanse, Sofie M.
Yaqub, Maqsood
Windhorst, Albert D.
Lammertsma, Adriaan A.
van Berckel, Bart N. M.
Boellaard, Ronald
Model selection criteria for dynamic brain PET studies
title Model selection criteria for dynamic brain PET studies
title_full Model selection criteria for dynamic brain PET studies
title_fullStr Model selection criteria for dynamic brain PET studies
title_full_unstemmed Model selection criteria for dynamic brain PET studies
title_short Model selection criteria for dynamic brain PET studies
title_sort model selection criteria for dynamic brain pet studies
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29209862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0197-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gollasandeepsv modelselectioncriteriafordynamicbrainpetstudies
AT adriaansesofiem modelselectioncriteriafordynamicbrainpetstudies
AT yaqubmaqsood modelselectioncriteriafordynamicbrainpetstudies
AT windhorstalbertd modelselectioncriteriafordynamicbrainpetstudies
AT lammertsmaadriaana modelselectioncriteriafordynamicbrainpetstudies
AT vanberckelbartnm modelselectioncriteriafordynamicbrainpetstudies
AT boellaardronald modelselectioncriteriafordynamicbrainpetstudies