Cargando…

Automatic Evaluations and Exercising: Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research

The general purpose of this systematic review was to summarize, structure and evaluate the findings on automatic evaluations of exercising. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported measuring automatic evaluations of exercising with an implicit measure and assessed some kind of exercise v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schinkoeth, Michaela, Antoniewicz, Franziska
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29250022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02103
_version_ 1783284050720456704
author Schinkoeth, Michaela
Antoniewicz, Franziska
author_facet Schinkoeth, Michaela
Antoniewicz, Franziska
author_sort Schinkoeth, Michaela
collection PubMed
description The general purpose of this systematic review was to summarize, structure and evaluate the findings on automatic evaluations of exercising. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported measuring automatic evaluations of exercising with an implicit measure and assessed some kind of exercise variable. Fourteen nonexperimental and six experimental studies (out of a total N = 1,928) were identified and rated by two independent reviewers. The main study characteristics were extracted and the grade of evidence for each study evaluated. First, results revealed a large heterogeneity in the applied measures to assess automatic evaluations of exercising and the exercise variables. Generally, small to large-sized significant relations between automatic evaluations of exercising and exercise variables were identified in the vast majority of studies. The review offers a systematization of the various examined exercise variables and prompts to differentiate more carefully between actually observed exercise behavior (proximal exercise indicator) and associated physiological or psychological variables (distal exercise indicator). Second, a lack of transparent reported reflections on the differing theoretical basis leading to the use of specific implicit measures was observed. Implicit measures should be applied purposefully, taking into consideration the individual advantages or disadvantages of the measures. Third, 12 studies were rated as providing first-grade evidence (lowest grade of evidence), five represent second-grade and three were rated as third-grade evidence. There is a dramatic lack of experimental studies, which are essential for illustrating the cause-effect relation between automatic evaluations of exercising and exercise and investigating under which conditions automatic evaluations of exercising influence behavior. Conclusions about the necessity of exercise interventions targeted at the alteration of automatic evaluations of exercising should therefore not be drawn too hastily.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5717007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57170072017-12-15 Automatic Evaluations and Exercising: Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research Schinkoeth, Michaela Antoniewicz, Franziska Front Psychol Psychology The general purpose of this systematic review was to summarize, structure and evaluate the findings on automatic evaluations of exercising. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported measuring automatic evaluations of exercising with an implicit measure and assessed some kind of exercise variable. Fourteen nonexperimental and six experimental studies (out of a total N = 1,928) were identified and rated by two independent reviewers. The main study characteristics were extracted and the grade of evidence for each study evaluated. First, results revealed a large heterogeneity in the applied measures to assess automatic evaluations of exercising and the exercise variables. Generally, small to large-sized significant relations between automatic evaluations of exercising and exercise variables were identified in the vast majority of studies. The review offers a systematization of the various examined exercise variables and prompts to differentiate more carefully between actually observed exercise behavior (proximal exercise indicator) and associated physiological or psychological variables (distal exercise indicator). Second, a lack of transparent reported reflections on the differing theoretical basis leading to the use of specific implicit measures was observed. Implicit measures should be applied purposefully, taking into consideration the individual advantages or disadvantages of the measures. Third, 12 studies were rated as providing first-grade evidence (lowest grade of evidence), five represent second-grade and three were rated as third-grade evidence. There is a dramatic lack of experimental studies, which are essential for illustrating the cause-effect relation between automatic evaluations of exercising and exercise and investigating under which conditions automatic evaluations of exercising influence behavior. Conclusions about the necessity of exercise interventions targeted at the alteration of automatic evaluations of exercising should therefore not be drawn too hastily. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5717007/ /pubmed/29250022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02103 Text en Copyright © 2017 Schinkoeth and Antoniewicz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Schinkoeth, Michaela
Antoniewicz, Franziska
Automatic Evaluations and Exercising: Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research
title Automatic Evaluations and Exercising: Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research
title_full Automatic Evaluations and Exercising: Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research
title_fullStr Automatic Evaluations and Exercising: Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research
title_full_unstemmed Automatic Evaluations and Exercising: Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research
title_short Automatic Evaluations and Exercising: Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research
title_sort automatic evaluations and exercising: systematic review and implications for future research
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29250022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02103
work_keys_str_mv AT schinkoethmichaela automaticevaluationsandexercisingsystematicreviewandimplicationsforfutureresearch
AT antoniewiczfranziska automaticevaluationsandexercisingsystematicreviewandimplicationsforfutureresearch