Cargando…
Bioresorbable scaffold -fourth revolution or failed revolution: Is low scaffold strut thickness the wrong target?
Bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) technology has currently fallen into disrepute because of inordinately high risk of scaffold thrombosis and post-procedure myocardial infarction. Low tensile and radial strengths of polymeric BRS contributing to improper strut embedment have been identified as major corr...
Autor principal: | Mishra, Sundeep |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29174242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2017.10.004 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A fresh look at bioresorbable scaffold technology: Intuition pumps
por: Mishra, Sundeep
Publicado: (2017) -
Exercise rehabilitation in the fourth industrial revolution
por: Jee, Yong-Seok
Publicado: (2017) -
Early scaffold strut coverage in ultra-high molecular weight amorphous PLLA sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds: impact of strut thickness assessed in normal porcine coronary arteries
por: Gąsior, Paweł, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The Fourth Industrial Revolution and oral and maxillofacial surgery
por: Han, Sejin
Publicado: (2018) -
The fourth education revolution
por: Seldon, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2018)