Cargando…

Radical cystectomy in the elderly – Is this a safe treatment option?

OBJECTIVE: To determine if significant differences exist in the perioperative outcomes of patients aged >75 years treated with radical cystectomy (RC) compared to younger patients, as RC is frequently not offered to ‘elderly’ patients with bladder cancer because of supposed increased risks of com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, Matthew J., Elmussareh, Muhammad, Weston, Philip, Dooldeniya, Mohantha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.09.002
_version_ 1783284144078323712
author Young, Matthew J.
Elmussareh, Muhammad
Weston, Philip
Dooldeniya, Mohantha
author_facet Young, Matthew J.
Elmussareh, Muhammad
Weston, Philip
Dooldeniya, Mohantha
author_sort Young, Matthew J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine if significant differences exist in the perioperative outcomes of patients aged >75 years treated with radical cystectomy (RC) compared to younger patients, as RC is frequently not offered to ‘elderly’ patients with bladder cancer because of supposed increased risks of complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data of all patients that underwent RC in our centre from May 2013 to June 2015. In all, 81 consecutive RCs were identified and included in our study. Patients were divided into two age groups: Group A, aged <75 years (51 patients) and Group B, aged ≥75 years (30). Co-morbidities and perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Fisher’s exact test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In 68 patients RC was performed laparoscopically and the remaining 13 patients underwent open RC. The mean (range) age was 70.7 (36–85) years. There were 37 patients with muscle-invasive disease and 42 had non-muscle-invasive disease. The median hospital stay was not significantly different between the two age groups (10 vs 11 days). There was no significant difference in the preoperative Charlson co-morbidity index. The 30-day mortality rate was 4% for those aged <75 years and 6.6% for those aged ≥75 years, with overall perioperative complication rates of 57% vs 66%, respectively. Most complications were minor (Clavien–Dindo Grade I–II) and there was no statistically significant difference between the two cohorts. There was also no statistically significant difference in blood transfusion rates. CONCLUSION: RC in patients aged ≥75 years has similar perioperative morbidity when compared with younger patients and can be offered in selected elderly patients. Thus, age should not be an absolute contraindication for RC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5717452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57174522017-12-11 Radical cystectomy in the elderly – Is this a safe treatment option? Young, Matthew J. Elmussareh, Muhammad Weston, Philip Dooldeniya, Mohantha Arab J Urol Oncology/Reconstruction OBJECTIVE: To determine if significant differences exist in the perioperative outcomes of patients aged >75 years treated with radical cystectomy (RC) compared to younger patients, as RC is frequently not offered to ‘elderly’ patients with bladder cancer because of supposed increased risks of complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data of all patients that underwent RC in our centre from May 2013 to June 2015. In all, 81 consecutive RCs were identified and included in our study. Patients were divided into two age groups: Group A, aged <75 years (51 patients) and Group B, aged ≥75 years (30). Co-morbidities and perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Fisher’s exact test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In 68 patients RC was performed laparoscopically and the remaining 13 patients underwent open RC. The mean (range) age was 70.7 (36–85) years. There were 37 patients with muscle-invasive disease and 42 had non-muscle-invasive disease. The median hospital stay was not significantly different between the two age groups (10 vs 11 days). There was no significant difference in the preoperative Charlson co-morbidity index. The 30-day mortality rate was 4% for those aged <75 years and 6.6% for those aged ≥75 years, with overall perioperative complication rates of 57% vs 66%, respectively. Most complications were minor (Clavien–Dindo Grade I–II) and there was no statistically significant difference between the two cohorts. There was also no statistically significant difference in blood transfusion rates. CONCLUSION: RC in patients aged ≥75 years has similar perioperative morbidity when compared with younger patients and can be offered in selected elderly patients. Thus, age should not be an absolute contraindication for RC. Elsevier 2017-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5717452/ /pubmed/29234541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.09.002 Text en © 2017 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Arab Association of Urology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Oncology/Reconstruction
Young, Matthew J.
Elmussareh, Muhammad
Weston, Philip
Dooldeniya, Mohantha
Radical cystectomy in the elderly – Is this a safe treatment option?
title Radical cystectomy in the elderly – Is this a safe treatment option?
title_full Radical cystectomy in the elderly – Is this a safe treatment option?
title_fullStr Radical cystectomy in the elderly – Is this a safe treatment option?
title_full_unstemmed Radical cystectomy in the elderly – Is this a safe treatment option?
title_short Radical cystectomy in the elderly – Is this a safe treatment option?
title_sort radical cystectomy in the elderly – is this a safe treatment option?
topic Oncology/Reconstruction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.09.002
work_keys_str_mv AT youngmatthewj radicalcystectomyintheelderlyisthisasafetreatmentoption
AT elmussarehmuhammad radicalcystectomyintheelderlyisthisasafetreatmentoption
AT westonphilip radicalcystectomyintheelderlyisthisasafetreatmentoption
AT dooldeniyamohantha radicalcystectomyintheelderlyisthisasafetreatmentoption