Cargando…

Blood-Based Protein Signatures for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES: Blood-based proteins might be an attractive option for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), but individually they are unlikely to achieve the diagnostic performance required for population based screening. We aimed at summarizing current evidence of diagnostic performance of signa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhardwaj, Megha, Gies, Anton, Werner, Simone, Schrotz-King, Petra, Brenner, Hermann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29189767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2017.53
_version_ 1783284155608465408
author Bhardwaj, Megha
Gies, Anton
Werner, Simone
Schrotz-King, Petra
Brenner, Hermann
author_facet Bhardwaj, Megha
Gies, Anton
Werner, Simone
Schrotz-King, Petra
Brenner, Hermann
author_sort Bhardwaj, Megha
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Blood-based proteins might be an attractive option for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), but individually they are unlikely to achieve the diagnostic performance required for population based screening. We aimed at summarizing current evidence of diagnostic performance of signatures based on multiple proteins for early detection of CRC. METHODS: A systematic literature review adhering to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis) guidelines was performed. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for potentially relevant studies published until 28th August, 2017. Relevant studies were identified by predefined eligibility criteria. Estimates of indicators of diagnostic performance such as sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC), along with information on validation and other key methodological procedures were extracted. Study quality was assessed by a QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) instrument tool. RESULTS: Thirty six eligible studies with numbers of CRC cases ranging from 23 to 512 and the number of proteins included in signatures ranged from 3 to 13 were identified. Reported Youden’s Index and AUC ranged from 0.19 to 0.95 and from 0.62 to 0.996, respectively. However most studies, especially those reporting better diagnostic performance, were conducted in clinical rather than screening setting and many studies lacked any internal or external validation of identified algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Blood-based tests using signatures of multiple proteins may be a promising approach for non-invasive CRC screening. However, promising signatures identified in clinical settings still require rigorous evaluation in large studies conducted in true screening setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5717517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57175172017-12-07 Blood-Based Protein Signatures for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review Bhardwaj, Megha Gies, Anton Werner, Simone Schrotz-King, Petra Brenner, Hermann Clin Transl Gastroenterol Clinical and Systematic Reviews OBJECTIVES: Blood-based proteins might be an attractive option for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), but individually they are unlikely to achieve the diagnostic performance required for population based screening. We aimed at summarizing current evidence of diagnostic performance of signatures based on multiple proteins for early detection of CRC. METHODS: A systematic literature review adhering to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis) guidelines was performed. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for potentially relevant studies published until 28th August, 2017. Relevant studies were identified by predefined eligibility criteria. Estimates of indicators of diagnostic performance such as sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC), along with information on validation and other key methodological procedures were extracted. Study quality was assessed by a QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) instrument tool. RESULTS: Thirty six eligible studies with numbers of CRC cases ranging from 23 to 512 and the number of proteins included in signatures ranged from 3 to 13 were identified. Reported Youden’s Index and AUC ranged from 0.19 to 0.95 and from 0.62 to 0.996, respectively. However most studies, especially those reporting better diagnostic performance, were conducted in clinical rather than screening setting and many studies lacked any internal or external validation of identified algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Blood-based tests using signatures of multiple proteins may be a promising approach for non-invasive CRC screening. However, promising signatures identified in clinical settings still require rigorous evaluation in large studies conducted in true screening setting. Nature Publishing Group 2017-11 2017-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5717517/ /pubmed/29189767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2017.53 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology is an open-access journal published by Nature Publishing Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical and Systematic Reviews
Bhardwaj, Megha
Gies, Anton
Werner, Simone
Schrotz-King, Petra
Brenner, Hermann
Blood-Based Protein Signatures for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
title Blood-Based Protein Signatures for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_full Blood-Based Protein Signatures for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Blood-Based Protein Signatures for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Blood-Based Protein Signatures for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_short Blood-Based Protein Signatures for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_sort blood-based protein signatures for early detection of colorectal cancer: a systematic review
topic Clinical and Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29189767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2017.53
work_keys_str_mv AT bhardwajmegha bloodbasedproteinsignaturesforearlydetectionofcolorectalcancerasystematicreview
AT giesanton bloodbasedproteinsignaturesforearlydetectionofcolorectalcancerasystematicreview
AT wernersimone bloodbasedproteinsignaturesforearlydetectionofcolorectalcancerasystematicreview
AT schrotzkingpetra bloodbasedproteinsignaturesforearlydetectionofcolorectalcancerasystematicreview
AT brennerhermann bloodbasedproteinsignaturesforearlydetectionofcolorectalcancerasystematicreview