Cargando…

Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample

Mitochondrial DNA sequence is frequently used to infer species' boundaries, as divergence is relatively rapid when populations are reproductively isolated. However, the shared history of a non-recombining gene naturally leads to correlation of pairwise differences, resulting in mtDNA clusters t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morgan-Richards, Mary, Bulgarella, Mariana, Sivyer, Louisa, Dowle, Edwina J., Hale, Marie, McKean, Natasha E., Trewick, Steven A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29291063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170730
_version_ 1783284180904312832
author Morgan-Richards, Mary
Bulgarella, Mariana
Sivyer, Louisa
Dowle, Edwina J.
Hale, Marie
McKean, Natasha E.
Trewick, Steven A.
author_facet Morgan-Richards, Mary
Bulgarella, Mariana
Sivyer, Louisa
Dowle, Edwina J.
Hale, Marie
McKean, Natasha E.
Trewick, Steven A.
author_sort Morgan-Richards, Mary
collection PubMed
description Mitochondrial DNA sequence is frequently used to infer species' boundaries, as divergence is relatively rapid when populations are reproductively isolated. However, the shared history of a non-recombining gene naturally leads to correlation of pairwise differences, resulting in mtDNA clusters that might be mistaken for evidence of multiple species. There are four distinct processes that can explain high levels of mtDNA sequence difference within a single sample. Here, we examine one case in detail as an exemplar to distinguish among competing hypotheses. Within our sample of tree wētā (Hemideina crassidens; Orthoptera), we found multiple mtDNA haplotypes for a protein-coding region (cytb/ND1) that differed by a maximum of 7.9%. From sequencing the whole mitochondrial genome of two representative individuals, we found evidence of constraining selection. Heterozygotes were as common as expected under random mating at five nuclear loci. Morphological traits and nuclear markers did not resolve the mtDNA groupings of individuals. We concluded that the large differences found among our sample of mtDNA sequences were simply owing to a large population size over an extended period of time allowing an equilibrium between mutation and drift to retain a great deal of genetic diversity within a single species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5717637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57176372017-12-29 Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample Morgan-Richards, Mary Bulgarella, Mariana Sivyer, Louisa Dowle, Edwina J. Hale, Marie McKean, Natasha E. Trewick, Steven A. R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Mitochondrial DNA sequence is frequently used to infer species' boundaries, as divergence is relatively rapid when populations are reproductively isolated. However, the shared history of a non-recombining gene naturally leads to correlation of pairwise differences, resulting in mtDNA clusters that might be mistaken for evidence of multiple species. There are four distinct processes that can explain high levels of mtDNA sequence difference within a single sample. Here, we examine one case in detail as an exemplar to distinguish among competing hypotheses. Within our sample of tree wētā (Hemideina crassidens; Orthoptera), we found multiple mtDNA haplotypes for a protein-coding region (cytb/ND1) that differed by a maximum of 7.9%. From sequencing the whole mitochondrial genome of two representative individuals, we found evidence of constraining selection. Heterozygotes were as common as expected under random mating at five nuclear loci. Morphological traits and nuclear markers did not resolve the mtDNA groupings of individuals. We concluded that the large differences found among our sample of mtDNA sequences were simply owing to a large population size over an extended period of time allowing an equilibrium between mutation and drift to retain a great deal of genetic diversity within a single species. The Royal Society Publishing 2017-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5717637/ /pubmed/29291063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170730 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Morgan-Richards, Mary
Bulgarella, Mariana
Sivyer, Louisa
Dowle, Edwina J.
Hale, Marie
McKean, Natasha E.
Trewick, Steven A.
Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample
title Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample
title_full Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample
title_fullStr Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample
title_full_unstemmed Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample
title_short Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample
title_sort explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29291063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170730
work_keys_str_mv AT morganrichardsmary explaininglargemitochondrialsequencedifferenceswithinapopulationsample
AT bulgarellamariana explaininglargemitochondrialsequencedifferenceswithinapopulationsample
AT sivyerlouisa explaininglargemitochondrialsequencedifferenceswithinapopulationsample
AT dowleedwinaj explaininglargemitochondrialsequencedifferenceswithinapopulationsample
AT halemarie explaininglargemitochondrialsequencedifferenceswithinapopulationsample
AT mckeannatashae explaininglargemitochondrialsequencedifferenceswithinapopulationsample
AT trewickstevena explaininglargemitochondrialsequencedifferenceswithinapopulationsample