Cargando…
Tweeting birds: online mentions predict future citations in ornithology
The rapid growth of online tools to communicate scientific research raises the important question of whether online attention is associated with citations in the scholarly literature. The Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) quantifies the attention received by a scientific publication on various online...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29291121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171371 |
_version_ | 1783284195714400256 |
---|---|
author | Finch, Tom O'Hanlon, Nina Dudley, Steve P. |
author_facet | Finch, Tom O'Hanlon, Nina Dudley, Steve P. |
author_sort | Finch, Tom |
collection | PubMed |
description | The rapid growth of online tools to communicate scientific research raises the important question of whether online attention is associated with citations in the scholarly literature. The Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) quantifies the attention received by a scientific publication on various online platforms including news, blogs and social media. It has been advanced as a rapid way of gauging the impact of a piece of research, both in terms of potential future scholarly citations and wider online engagement. Here, we explore variation in the AAS of 2677 research articles published in 10 ornithological journals between 2012 and 2016. On average, AAS increased sevenfold in just five years, primarily due to increased activity on Twitter which contributed 75% of the total score. For a subset of 878 articles published in 2014, including an additional 323 ornithology articles from non-specialist journals, an increase in AAS from 1 to 20 resulted in a predicted 112% increase in citation count from 2.6 to 5.5 citations per article. This effect interacted with journal impact factor, with weaker effects of AAS in higher impact factor journals. Our results suggest that altmetrics (or the online activity they measure), as well as complementing traditional measures of scholarly impact in ornithology such as citations, may also anticipate or even drive them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5717696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Royal Society Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57176962017-12-29 Tweeting birds: online mentions predict future citations in ornithology Finch, Tom O'Hanlon, Nina Dudley, Steve P. R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) The rapid growth of online tools to communicate scientific research raises the important question of whether online attention is associated with citations in the scholarly literature. The Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) quantifies the attention received by a scientific publication on various online platforms including news, blogs and social media. It has been advanced as a rapid way of gauging the impact of a piece of research, both in terms of potential future scholarly citations and wider online engagement. Here, we explore variation in the AAS of 2677 research articles published in 10 ornithological journals between 2012 and 2016. On average, AAS increased sevenfold in just five years, primarily due to increased activity on Twitter which contributed 75% of the total score. For a subset of 878 articles published in 2014, including an additional 323 ornithology articles from non-specialist journals, an increase in AAS from 1 to 20 resulted in a predicted 112% increase in citation count from 2.6 to 5.5 citations per article. This effect interacted with journal impact factor, with weaker effects of AAS in higher impact factor journals. Our results suggest that altmetrics (or the online activity they measure), as well as complementing traditional measures of scholarly impact in ornithology such as citations, may also anticipate or even drive them. The Royal Society Publishing 2017-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5717696/ /pubmed/29291121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171371 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Biology (Whole Organism) Finch, Tom O'Hanlon, Nina Dudley, Steve P. Tweeting birds: online mentions predict future citations in ornithology |
title | Tweeting birds: online mentions predict future citations in ornithology |
title_full | Tweeting birds: online mentions predict future citations in ornithology |
title_fullStr | Tweeting birds: online mentions predict future citations in ornithology |
title_full_unstemmed | Tweeting birds: online mentions predict future citations in ornithology |
title_short | Tweeting birds: online mentions predict future citations in ornithology |
title_sort | tweeting birds: online mentions predict future citations in ornithology |
topic | Biology (Whole Organism) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29291121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171371 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT finchtom tweetingbirdsonlinementionspredictfuturecitationsinornithology AT ohanlonnina tweetingbirdsonlinementionspredictfuturecitationsinornithology AT dudleystevep tweetingbirdsonlinementionspredictfuturecitationsinornithology |