Cargando…

Efficacy of Exclusive Lingual Nerve Block versus Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Achieving Lingual Soft-tissue Anesthesia

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of exclusive lingual nerve block (LNB) in achieving selective lingual soft-tissue anesthesia in comparison with conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients indicated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balasubramanian, Sasikala, Paneerselvam, Elavenil, Guruprasad, T, Pathumai, M, Abraham, Simin, Krishnakumar Raja, V. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264294
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_65_17
_version_ 1783284236524978176
author Balasubramanian, Sasikala
Paneerselvam, Elavenil
Guruprasad, T
Pathumai, M
Abraham, Simin
Krishnakumar Raja, V. B.
author_facet Balasubramanian, Sasikala
Paneerselvam, Elavenil
Guruprasad, T
Pathumai, M
Abraham, Simin
Krishnakumar Raja, V. B.
author_sort Balasubramanian, Sasikala
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of exclusive lingual nerve block (LNB) in achieving selective lingual soft-tissue anesthesia in comparison with conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients indicated for the extraction of lower premolars were recruited for the study. The samples were allocated by randomization into control and study groups. Lingual soft-tissue anesthesia was achieved by IANB and exclusive LNB in the control and study group, respectively. The primary outcome variable studied was anesthesia of ipsilateral lingual mucoperiosteum, floor of mouth and tongue. The secondary variables assessed were (1) taste sensation immediately following administration of local anesthesia and (2) mouth opening and lingual nerve paresthesia on the first postoperative day. RESULTS: Data analysis for descriptive and inferential statistics was performed using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Released 2013) and a P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In comparison with the control group, the study group (LNB) showed statistically significant anesthesia of the lingual gingiva of incisors, molars, anterior floor of the mouth, and anterior tongue. CONCLUSION: Exclusive LNB is superior to IAN nerve block in achieving selective anesthesia of lingual soft tissues. It is technically simple and associated with minimal complications as compared to IAN block.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5717903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57179032017-12-20 Efficacy of Exclusive Lingual Nerve Block versus Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Achieving Lingual Soft-tissue Anesthesia Balasubramanian, Sasikala Paneerselvam, Elavenil Guruprasad, T Pathumai, M Abraham, Simin Krishnakumar Raja, V. B. Ann Maxillofac Surg Original Article - Comparative Study OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of exclusive lingual nerve block (LNB) in achieving selective lingual soft-tissue anesthesia in comparison with conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients indicated for the extraction of lower premolars were recruited for the study. The samples were allocated by randomization into control and study groups. Lingual soft-tissue anesthesia was achieved by IANB and exclusive LNB in the control and study group, respectively. The primary outcome variable studied was anesthesia of ipsilateral lingual mucoperiosteum, floor of mouth and tongue. The secondary variables assessed were (1) taste sensation immediately following administration of local anesthesia and (2) mouth opening and lingual nerve paresthesia on the first postoperative day. RESULTS: Data analysis for descriptive and inferential statistics was performed using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Released 2013) and a P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In comparison with the control group, the study group (LNB) showed statistically significant anesthesia of the lingual gingiva of incisors, molars, anterior floor of the mouth, and anterior tongue. CONCLUSION: Exclusive LNB is superior to IAN nerve block in achieving selective anesthesia of lingual soft tissues. It is technically simple and associated with minimal complications as compared to IAN block. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5717903/ /pubmed/29264294 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_65_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article - Comparative Study
Balasubramanian, Sasikala
Paneerselvam, Elavenil
Guruprasad, T
Pathumai, M
Abraham, Simin
Krishnakumar Raja, V. B.
Efficacy of Exclusive Lingual Nerve Block versus Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Achieving Lingual Soft-tissue Anesthesia
title Efficacy of Exclusive Lingual Nerve Block versus Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Achieving Lingual Soft-tissue Anesthesia
title_full Efficacy of Exclusive Lingual Nerve Block versus Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Achieving Lingual Soft-tissue Anesthesia
title_fullStr Efficacy of Exclusive Lingual Nerve Block versus Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Achieving Lingual Soft-tissue Anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Exclusive Lingual Nerve Block versus Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Achieving Lingual Soft-tissue Anesthesia
title_short Efficacy of Exclusive Lingual Nerve Block versus Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Achieving Lingual Soft-tissue Anesthesia
title_sort efficacy of exclusive lingual nerve block versus conventional inferior alveolar nerve block in achieving lingual soft-tissue anesthesia
topic Original Article - Comparative Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264294
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_65_17
work_keys_str_mv AT balasubramaniansasikala efficacyofexclusivelingualnerveblockversusconventionalinferioralveolarnerveblockinachievinglingualsofttissueanesthesia
AT paneerselvamelavenil efficacyofexclusivelingualnerveblockversusconventionalinferioralveolarnerveblockinachievinglingualsofttissueanesthesia
AT guruprasadt efficacyofexclusivelingualnerveblockversusconventionalinferioralveolarnerveblockinachievinglingualsofttissueanesthesia
AT pathumaim efficacyofexclusivelingualnerveblockversusconventionalinferioralveolarnerveblockinachievinglingualsofttissueanesthesia
AT abrahamsimin efficacyofexclusivelingualnerveblockversusconventionalinferioralveolarnerveblockinachievinglingualsofttissueanesthesia
AT krishnakumarrajavb efficacyofexclusivelingualnerveblockversusconventionalinferioralveolarnerveblockinachievinglingualsofttissueanesthesia