Cargando…

Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice

There is a growing literature documenting the complex realities of consent processes in the field, and the negotiations and ethical dilemmas involved. Much has also been written about how gender and power shape household decision-making processes. However, these bodies of literature have rarely been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamuya, Dorcas M, Molyneux, Catherine, S, Theobald, Sally
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000320
_version_ 1783284244407123968
author Kamuya, Dorcas M
Molyneux, Catherine, S
Theobald, Sally
author_facet Kamuya, Dorcas M
Molyneux, Catherine, S
Theobald, Sally
author_sort Kamuya, Dorcas M
collection PubMed
description There is a growing literature documenting the complex realities of consent processes in the field, and the negotiations and ethical dilemmas involved. Much has also been written about how gender and power shape household decision-making processes. However, these bodies of literature have rarely been brought together to inform research theory and practice in low-income settings. In this paper, qualitative research (observation, focus group discussions and interviews) were used alongside large clinical community-based studies conducted on the Kenyan Coast to explore how gender and power relations within households and communities and between fieldworkers and communities shape consent processes and interactions. This exploration is embedded in relevant literature and the implications for community-based health research policy and practice are considered. Across diverse forms of households, we observed significant consultation on whether or not to participate in research. Although men are typically described as household decision-makers, in practice, decision-making processes are often far more nuanced, with many women using their agency to control, sometimes subtly, the decisions made. Where decisions are made without adequately consulting women, many find strategies to exercise their choice, in ways that safeguard important relationships within households in the longer term. We also found that the gender of field staff who typically conduct research activities in the field, including consent processes, can influence household dynamics and decision-making processes with important implications for the science and ethics of research. It is essential that frontline field staff and their supervisors are aware of the complex and gendered realities of consent processes at household level, and their implications, and that they develop appropriate context-informed approaches that support ethical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5717932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57179322017-12-08 Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice Kamuya, Dorcas M Molyneux, Catherine, S Theobald, Sally BMJ Glob Health Research There is a growing literature documenting the complex realities of consent processes in the field, and the negotiations and ethical dilemmas involved. Much has also been written about how gender and power shape household decision-making processes. However, these bodies of literature have rarely been brought together to inform research theory and practice in low-income settings. In this paper, qualitative research (observation, focus group discussions and interviews) were used alongside large clinical community-based studies conducted on the Kenyan Coast to explore how gender and power relations within households and communities and between fieldworkers and communities shape consent processes and interactions. This exploration is embedded in relevant literature and the implications for community-based health research policy and practice are considered. Across diverse forms of households, we observed significant consultation on whether or not to participate in research. Although men are typically described as household decision-makers, in practice, decision-making processes are often far more nuanced, with many women using their agency to control, sometimes subtly, the decisions made. Where decisions are made without adequately consulting women, many find strategies to exercise their choice, in ways that safeguard important relationships within households in the longer term. We also found that the gender of field staff who typically conduct research activities in the field, including consent processes, can influence household dynamics and decision-making processes with important implications for the science and ethics of research. It is essential that frontline field staff and their supervisors are aware of the complex and gendered realities of consent processes at household level, and their implications, and that they develop appropriate context-informed approaches that support ethical practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5717932/ /pubmed/29225935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000320 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Kamuya, Dorcas M
Molyneux, Catherine, S
Theobald, Sally
Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice
title Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice
title_full Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice
title_fullStr Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice
title_full_unstemmed Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice
title_short Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice
title_sort gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000320
work_keys_str_mv AT kamuyadorcasm genderednegotiationsforresearchparticipationincommunitybasedstudiesimplicationsforhealthresearchpolicyandpractice
AT molyneuxcatherines genderednegotiationsforresearchparticipationincommunitybasedstudiesimplicationsforhealthresearchpolicyandpractice
AT theobaldsally genderednegotiationsforresearchparticipationincommunitybasedstudiesimplicationsforhealthresearchpolicyandpractice