Cargando…
Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice
There is a growing literature documenting the complex realities of consent processes in the field, and the negotiations and ethical dilemmas involved. Much has also been written about how gender and power shape household decision-making processes. However, these bodies of literature have rarely been...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000320 |
_version_ | 1783284244407123968 |
---|---|
author | Kamuya, Dorcas M Molyneux, Catherine, S Theobald, Sally |
author_facet | Kamuya, Dorcas M Molyneux, Catherine, S Theobald, Sally |
author_sort | Kamuya, Dorcas M |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a growing literature documenting the complex realities of consent processes in the field, and the negotiations and ethical dilemmas involved. Much has also been written about how gender and power shape household decision-making processes. However, these bodies of literature have rarely been brought together to inform research theory and practice in low-income settings. In this paper, qualitative research (observation, focus group discussions and interviews) were used alongside large clinical community-based studies conducted on the Kenyan Coast to explore how gender and power relations within households and communities and between fieldworkers and communities shape consent processes and interactions. This exploration is embedded in relevant literature and the implications for community-based health research policy and practice are considered. Across diverse forms of households, we observed significant consultation on whether or not to participate in research. Although men are typically described as household decision-makers, in practice, decision-making processes are often far more nuanced, with many women using their agency to control, sometimes subtly, the decisions made. Where decisions are made without adequately consulting women, many find strategies to exercise their choice, in ways that safeguard important relationships within households in the longer term. We also found that the gender of field staff who typically conduct research activities in the field, including consent processes, can influence household dynamics and decision-making processes with important implications for the science and ethics of research. It is essential that frontline field staff and their supervisors are aware of the complex and gendered realities of consent processes at household level, and their implications, and that they develop appropriate context-informed approaches that support ethical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5717932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57179322017-12-08 Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice Kamuya, Dorcas M Molyneux, Catherine, S Theobald, Sally BMJ Glob Health Research There is a growing literature documenting the complex realities of consent processes in the field, and the negotiations and ethical dilemmas involved. Much has also been written about how gender and power shape household decision-making processes. However, these bodies of literature have rarely been brought together to inform research theory and practice in low-income settings. In this paper, qualitative research (observation, focus group discussions and interviews) were used alongside large clinical community-based studies conducted on the Kenyan Coast to explore how gender and power relations within households and communities and between fieldworkers and communities shape consent processes and interactions. This exploration is embedded in relevant literature and the implications for community-based health research policy and practice are considered. Across diverse forms of households, we observed significant consultation on whether or not to participate in research. Although men are typically described as household decision-makers, in practice, decision-making processes are often far more nuanced, with many women using their agency to control, sometimes subtly, the decisions made. Where decisions are made without adequately consulting women, many find strategies to exercise their choice, in ways that safeguard important relationships within households in the longer term. We also found that the gender of field staff who typically conduct research activities in the field, including consent processes, can influence household dynamics and decision-making processes with important implications for the science and ethics of research. It is essential that frontline field staff and their supervisors are aware of the complex and gendered realities of consent processes at household level, and their implications, and that they develop appropriate context-informed approaches that support ethical practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5717932/ /pubmed/29225935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000320 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Kamuya, Dorcas M Molyneux, Catherine, S Theobald, Sally Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice |
title | Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice |
title_full | Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice |
title_fullStr | Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice |
title_short | Gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice |
title_sort | gendered negotiations for research participation in community-based studies: implications for health research policy and practice |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000320 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kamuyadorcasm genderednegotiationsforresearchparticipationincommunitybasedstudiesimplicationsforhealthresearchpolicyandpractice AT molyneuxcatherines genderednegotiationsforresearchparticipationincommunitybasedstudiesimplicationsforhealthresearchpolicyandpractice AT theobaldsally genderednegotiationsforresearchparticipationincommunitybasedstudiesimplicationsforhealthresearchpolicyandpractice |