Cargando…

Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries

INTRODUCTION: Female genital mutilation (FGM) harms women’s health and well-being and is widely considered a violation of human rights. The United Nations has called for elimination of the practice by 2030. METHODS: We used household survey data to measure trends in the prevalence of FGM in 22 count...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koski, Alissa, Heymann, Jody
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000467
_version_ 1783284247548657664
author Koski, Alissa
Heymann, Jody
author_facet Koski, Alissa
Heymann, Jody
author_sort Koski, Alissa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Female genital mutilation (FGM) harms women’s health and well-being and is widely considered a violation of human rights. The United Nations has called for elimination of the practice by 2030. METHODS: We used household survey data to measure trends in the prevalence of FGM in 22 countries. We also examined trends in the severity of the practice by measuring changes in the prevalence of flesh removal, infibulation and symbolic ‘nicking’ of the genitals. We evaluated the extent to which measurement error may have influenced our estimates by observing the consistency of reports for the same birth cohorts over successive survey waves. RESULTS: The prevalence of all types of FGM fell in 17 of 22 countries we examined. The vast majority of women who undergo FGM have flesh removed from their genitals, likely corresponding to the partial or total removal of the clitoris and labia. Infibulation is still practised throughout much of sub-Saharan Africa. Its prevalence has declined in most countries, but in Chad, Mali and Sierra Leone the prevalence has increased by 2–8 percentage points over 30 years. Symbolic nicking of the genitals is relatively rare but becoming more common in Burkina Faso, Chad, Guinea and Mali. CONCLUSION: FGM is becoming less common over time, but it remains a pervasive practice in some countries: more than half of women in 7 of the 22 countries we examined still experience FGM. The severity of the procedures has not changed substantially over time. Rigorous evaluation of interventions aimed at eliminating or reducing the harms associated with the practice is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5717946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57179462017-12-08 Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries Koski, Alissa Heymann, Jody BMJ Glob Health Research INTRODUCTION: Female genital mutilation (FGM) harms women’s health and well-being and is widely considered a violation of human rights. The United Nations has called for elimination of the practice by 2030. METHODS: We used household survey data to measure trends in the prevalence of FGM in 22 countries. We also examined trends in the severity of the practice by measuring changes in the prevalence of flesh removal, infibulation and symbolic ‘nicking’ of the genitals. We evaluated the extent to which measurement error may have influenced our estimates by observing the consistency of reports for the same birth cohorts over successive survey waves. RESULTS: The prevalence of all types of FGM fell in 17 of 22 countries we examined. The vast majority of women who undergo FGM have flesh removed from their genitals, likely corresponding to the partial or total removal of the clitoris and labia. Infibulation is still practised throughout much of sub-Saharan Africa. Its prevalence has declined in most countries, but in Chad, Mali and Sierra Leone the prevalence has increased by 2–8 percentage points over 30 years. Symbolic nicking of the genitals is relatively rare but becoming more common in Burkina Faso, Chad, Guinea and Mali. CONCLUSION: FGM is becoming less common over time, but it remains a pervasive practice in some countries: more than half of women in 7 of the 22 countries we examined still experience FGM. The severity of the procedures has not changed substantially over time. Rigorous evaluation of interventions aimed at eliminating or reducing the harms associated with the practice is needed. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5717946/ /pubmed/29225952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000467 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Koski, Alissa
Heymann, Jody
Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries
title Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries
title_full Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries
title_fullStr Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries
title_full_unstemmed Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries
title_short Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries
title_sort thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000467
work_keys_str_mv AT koskialissa thirtyyeartrendsintheprevalenceandseverityoffemalegenitalmutilationacomparisonof22countries
AT heymannjody thirtyyeartrendsintheprevalenceandseverityoffemalegenitalmutilationacomparisonof22countries