Cargando…

Comparative analysis of gender differences in outcomes after trauma in India and the USA: case for standardised coding of injury mechanisms in trauma registries

INTRODUCTION: While females generally have better outcomes than males after traumatic injury, higher mortality has been shown to occur in females after intentional trauma in lower-income countries. However, gender differences in trauma outcomes in different countries have not been previously compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dasari, Mohini, David, Siddarth D, Miller, Elizabeth, Puyana, Juan Carlos, Roy, Nobhojit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000322
_version_ 1783284251426291712
author Dasari, Mohini
David, Siddarth D
Miller, Elizabeth
Puyana, Juan Carlos
Roy, Nobhojit
author_facet Dasari, Mohini
David, Siddarth D
Miller, Elizabeth
Puyana, Juan Carlos
Roy, Nobhojit
author_sort Dasari, Mohini
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While females generally have better outcomes than males after traumatic injury, higher mortality has been shown to occur in females after intentional trauma in lower-income countries. However, gender differences in trauma outcomes in different countries have not been previously compared. We conducted a two-country comparative analysis to characterise gender differences in mortality for different mechanisms of injury. METHODS: Two urban trauma databases were analysed from India and the USA for fall, motor vehicle collision (MVC) and assault patients between 2013 and 2015. Coarsened exact matching was used to match the two groups based on gender, age, injury severity score, Glasgow Coma Score and type of injury (blunt vs penetrating). The primary outcome of mortality was studied by using logistic regression to calculate the odds of death in the four country/gender subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 10 089 and 14 144 patients were included from the Indian and US databases, respectively. After matching on covariates, 7505 and 9448 patients were included in the logistic regression. Indian males had the highest odds of death compared with US males, US females and Indian females for falls, MVC and assaults. Indian females had over 7 times the odds of dying after falls, 5 times the odds of dying for MVC and 40 times the odds of dying after assaults when compared with US females. CONCLUSION: The high odds of death for Indian females compared with US females suggests that there are other injury and systemic factors that contribute to this discrepancy in mortality odds. This same mortality pattern and implication is seen for Indian males compared with all subgroups. Standardised coding of injury mechanism in trauma registries, in addition to intentionality of injury, can help further characterise discrepancies in outcomes by gender and country, to guide targeted injury prevention and care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5717963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57179632017-12-08 Comparative analysis of gender differences in outcomes after trauma in India and the USA: case for standardised coding of injury mechanisms in trauma registries Dasari, Mohini David, Siddarth D Miller, Elizabeth Puyana, Juan Carlos Roy, Nobhojit BMJ Glob Health Research INTRODUCTION: While females generally have better outcomes than males after traumatic injury, higher mortality has been shown to occur in females after intentional trauma in lower-income countries. However, gender differences in trauma outcomes in different countries have not been previously compared. We conducted a two-country comparative analysis to characterise gender differences in mortality for different mechanisms of injury. METHODS: Two urban trauma databases were analysed from India and the USA for fall, motor vehicle collision (MVC) and assault patients between 2013 and 2015. Coarsened exact matching was used to match the two groups based on gender, age, injury severity score, Glasgow Coma Score and type of injury (blunt vs penetrating). The primary outcome of mortality was studied by using logistic regression to calculate the odds of death in the four country/gender subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 10 089 and 14 144 patients were included from the Indian and US databases, respectively. After matching on covariates, 7505 and 9448 patients were included in the logistic regression. Indian males had the highest odds of death compared with US males, US females and Indian females for falls, MVC and assaults. Indian females had over 7 times the odds of dying after falls, 5 times the odds of dying for MVC and 40 times the odds of dying after assaults when compared with US females. CONCLUSION: The high odds of death for Indian females compared with US females suggests that there are other injury and systemic factors that contribute to this discrepancy in mortality odds. This same mortality pattern and implication is seen for Indian males compared with all subgroups. Standardised coding of injury mechanism in trauma registries, in addition to intentionality of injury, can help further characterise discrepancies in outcomes by gender and country, to guide targeted injury prevention and care. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5717963/ /pubmed/29225936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000322 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Dasari, Mohini
David, Siddarth D
Miller, Elizabeth
Puyana, Juan Carlos
Roy, Nobhojit
Comparative analysis of gender differences in outcomes after trauma in India and the USA: case for standardised coding of injury mechanisms in trauma registries
title Comparative analysis of gender differences in outcomes after trauma in India and the USA: case for standardised coding of injury mechanisms in trauma registries
title_full Comparative analysis of gender differences in outcomes after trauma in India and the USA: case for standardised coding of injury mechanisms in trauma registries
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of gender differences in outcomes after trauma in India and the USA: case for standardised coding of injury mechanisms in trauma registries
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of gender differences in outcomes after trauma in India and the USA: case for standardised coding of injury mechanisms in trauma registries
title_short Comparative analysis of gender differences in outcomes after trauma in India and the USA: case for standardised coding of injury mechanisms in trauma registries
title_sort comparative analysis of gender differences in outcomes after trauma in india and the usa: case for standardised coding of injury mechanisms in trauma registries
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000322
work_keys_str_mv AT dasarimohini comparativeanalysisofgenderdifferencesinoutcomesaftertraumainindiaandtheusacaseforstandardisedcodingofinjurymechanismsintraumaregistries
AT davidsiddarthd comparativeanalysisofgenderdifferencesinoutcomesaftertraumainindiaandtheusacaseforstandardisedcodingofinjurymechanismsintraumaregistries
AT millerelizabeth comparativeanalysisofgenderdifferencesinoutcomesaftertraumainindiaandtheusacaseforstandardisedcodingofinjurymechanismsintraumaregistries
AT puyanajuancarlos comparativeanalysisofgenderdifferencesinoutcomesaftertraumainindiaandtheusacaseforstandardisedcodingofinjurymechanismsintraumaregistries
AT roynobhojit comparativeanalysisofgenderdifferencesinoutcomesaftertraumainindiaandtheusacaseforstandardisedcodingofinjurymechanismsintraumaregistries