Cargando…
Alliance members’ roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada
BACKGROUND: The Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada (PHIRIC) is a multi-stakeholder alliance founded in 2006 to advance population health intervention research (PHIR). PHIRIC aimed to strengthen Canada’s capacity to conduct and use such research to inform policy and practic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29208021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0265-x |
_version_ | 1783284278438658048 |
---|---|
author | Di Ruggiero, Erica Kishchuk, Natalie Viehbeck, Sarah Edwards, Nancy Robinson, Kerry Riley, Barbara Fowler, Heather Smith |
author_facet | Di Ruggiero, Erica Kishchuk, Natalie Viehbeck, Sarah Edwards, Nancy Robinson, Kerry Riley, Barbara Fowler, Heather Smith |
author_sort | Di Ruggiero, Erica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada (PHIRIC) is a multi-stakeholder alliance founded in 2006 to advance population health intervention research (PHIR). PHIRIC aimed to strengthen Canada’s capacity to conduct and use such research to inform policy and practice to improve the public’s health by building PHIR as a field of research. In 2014, an evaluative study of PHIRIC at organisational and system levels was conducted, guided by a field-building and collaborative action perspective. METHODS: The study involved 17 qualitative key informant interviews with 21 current and former PHIRIC Planning Committee and Working Group members. The interviews examined how individuals and organisations were acting as champions and exerting leadership in building the field of PHIR. RESULTS: Founding PHIRIC organisational members have been championing PHIR at organisational and system levels. While the PHIR field has progressed in terms of enhanced funding, legitimacy, profile and capacity, some members and organisations faced constraints and challenges acting as leaders and champions in their respective environments. Expectations about the future of PHIRIC and field-building of PHIR were mixed, where longer-term and founding members of PHIRIC expressed more optimism than recent members. All agreed on the need for incorporating perspectives of decision-makers into PHIR directions and initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: The findings contribute to understanding alliance members’ roles in leadership and championship for field-building more generally, and for population health and PHIR specifically. Building this field requires multi-level efforts, collaborative action and distributed leadership to create the necessary conditions for PHIRIC members to both benefit from and contribute to advancing PHIR as a field. Lessons from this 'made in Canada' model may be of interest to other countries regarding the structures needed for PHIR field-building. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-017-0265-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5718088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57180882017-12-08 Alliance members’ roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada Di Ruggiero, Erica Kishchuk, Natalie Viehbeck, Sarah Edwards, Nancy Robinson, Kerry Riley, Barbara Fowler, Heather Smith Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: The Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada (PHIRIC) is a multi-stakeholder alliance founded in 2006 to advance population health intervention research (PHIR). PHIRIC aimed to strengthen Canada’s capacity to conduct and use such research to inform policy and practice to improve the public’s health by building PHIR as a field of research. In 2014, an evaluative study of PHIRIC at organisational and system levels was conducted, guided by a field-building and collaborative action perspective. METHODS: The study involved 17 qualitative key informant interviews with 21 current and former PHIRIC Planning Committee and Working Group members. The interviews examined how individuals and organisations were acting as champions and exerting leadership in building the field of PHIR. RESULTS: Founding PHIRIC organisational members have been championing PHIR at organisational and system levels. While the PHIR field has progressed in terms of enhanced funding, legitimacy, profile and capacity, some members and organisations faced constraints and challenges acting as leaders and champions in their respective environments. Expectations about the future of PHIRIC and field-building of PHIR were mixed, where longer-term and founding members of PHIRIC expressed more optimism than recent members. All agreed on the need for incorporating perspectives of decision-makers into PHIR directions and initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: The findings contribute to understanding alliance members’ roles in leadership and championship for field-building more generally, and for population health and PHIR specifically. Building this field requires multi-level efforts, collaborative action and distributed leadership to create the necessary conditions for PHIRIC members to both benefit from and contribute to advancing PHIR as a field. Lessons from this 'made in Canada' model may be of interest to other countries regarding the structures needed for PHIR field-building. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-017-0265-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5718088/ /pubmed/29208021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0265-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Di Ruggiero, Erica Kishchuk, Natalie Viehbeck, Sarah Edwards, Nancy Robinson, Kerry Riley, Barbara Fowler, Heather Smith Alliance members’ roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada |
title | Alliance members’ roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada |
title_full | Alliance members’ roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada |
title_fullStr | Alliance members’ roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Alliance members’ roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada |
title_short | Alliance members’ roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada |
title_sort | alliance members’ roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the population health intervention research initiative for canada |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29208021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0265-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diruggieroerica alliancemembersrolesincollectivefieldbuildinganassessmentofleadershipandchampionshipwithinthepopulationhealthinterventionresearchinitiativeforcanada AT kishchuknatalie alliancemembersrolesincollectivefieldbuildinganassessmentofleadershipandchampionshipwithinthepopulationhealthinterventionresearchinitiativeforcanada AT viehbecksarah alliancemembersrolesincollectivefieldbuildinganassessmentofleadershipandchampionshipwithinthepopulationhealthinterventionresearchinitiativeforcanada AT edwardsnancy alliancemembersrolesincollectivefieldbuildinganassessmentofleadershipandchampionshipwithinthepopulationhealthinterventionresearchinitiativeforcanada AT robinsonkerry alliancemembersrolesincollectivefieldbuildinganassessmentofleadershipandchampionshipwithinthepopulationhealthinterventionresearchinitiativeforcanada AT rileybarbara alliancemembersrolesincollectivefieldbuildinganassessmentofleadershipandchampionshipwithinthepopulationhealthinterventionresearchinitiativeforcanada AT fowlerheathersmith alliancemembersrolesincollectivefieldbuildinganassessmentofleadershipandchampionshipwithinthepopulationhealthinterventionresearchinitiativeforcanada |