Cargando…

Impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a MV‐CBCT system in head‐and‐neck patients

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units (MUs), reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a megavoltage cone‐beam computed tomography (MV‐CBCT) system in image‐guided radiation therapy (IG...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Ming X., Zhang, Xu, Li, Na, Han, Cheng B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22955643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3766
_version_ 1783284298665689088
author Jia, Ming X.
Zhang, Xu
Li, Na
Han, Cheng B.
author_facet Jia, Ming X.
Zhang, Xu
Li, Na
Han, Cheng B.
author_sort Jia, Ming X.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units (MUs), reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a megavoltage cone‐beam computed tomography (MV‐CBCT) system in image‐guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in head‐and‐neck patients. The MV‐CBCT system was a Siemens MVision, a commercial system integrated into the Siemens ONCOR linear accelerator. The positioning accuracy of the MV‐CBCT system was determined using an anthropomorphic phantom while varying the MV‐CBCT imaging MU, reconstruction slice thickness, and planning CT slice thickness. A total of 240 CBCT images from six head‐and‐neck patients who underwent intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment were acquired and reconstructed using different MV‐CBCT scanning protocols. The interfractional setup errors of the patients were retrospectively analyzed for different imaging MUs, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses. Using the anthropomorphic phantom, the largest measured mean deviation component and standard deviation of the MVision in 3D directions were 1.3 and 1.0 mm, respectively, for different CBCT imaging MUs, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses. The largest setup group system error (M), system error (∑), and random error (σ) from six head‐and‐neck patients were 0.6, 1.2, and 1.7 mm, respectively. No significant difference was found in the positioning accuracy of the MV‐CBCT system between the 5 and 8 MUs, and between the 1 and 3 mm reconstruction slice thicknesses. A thin planning CT slice thickness may achieve higher positioning precision using the phantom measurement, but no significant difference was found in clinical setup precision between the 1 and 3 mm planning CT slice thicknesses. PACS number: 87.55 ne
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5718243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57182432018-04-02 Impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a MV‐CBCT system in head‐and‐neck patients Jia, Ming X. Zhang, Xu Li, Na Han, Cheng B. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units (MUs), reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a megavoltage cone‐beam computed tomography (MV‐CBCT) system in image‐guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in head‐and‐neck patients. The MV‐CBCT system was a Siemens MVision, a commercial system integrated into the Siemens ONCOR linear accelerator. The positioning accuracy of the MV‐CBCT system was determined using an anthropomorphic phantom while varying the MV‐CBCT imaging MU, reconstruction slice thickness, and planning CT slice thickness. A total of 240 CBCT images from six head‐and‐neck patients who underwent intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment were acquired and reconstructed using different MV‐CBCT scanning protocols. The interfractional setup errors of the patients were retrospectively analyzed for different imaging MUs, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses. Using the anthropomorphic phantom, the largest measured mean deviation component and standard deviation of the MVision in 3D directions were 1.3 and 1.0 mm, respectively, for different CBCT imaging MUs, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses. The largest setup group system error (M), system error (∑), and random error (σ) from six head‐and‐neck patients were 0.6, 1.2, and 1.7 mm, respectively. No significant difference was found in the positioning accuracy of the MV‐CBCT system between the 5 and 8 MUs, and between the 1 and 3 mm reconstruction slice thicknesses. A thin planning CT slice thickness may achieve higher positioning precision using the phantom measurement, but no significant difference was found in clinical setup precision between the 1 and 3 mm planning CT slice thicknesses. PACS number: 87.55 ne John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5718243/ /pubmed/22955643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3766 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Jia, Ming X.
Zhang, Xu
Li, Na
Han, Cheng B.
Impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a MV‐CBCT system in head‐and‐neck patients
title Impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a MV‐CBCT system in head‐and‐neck patients
title_full Impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a MV‐CBCT system in head‐and‐neck patients
title_fullStr Impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a MV‐CBCT system in head‐and‐neck patients
title_full_unstemmed Impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a MV‐CBCT system in head‐and‐neck patients
title_short Impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a MV‐CBCT system in head‐and‐neck patients
title_sort impact of different cbct imaging monitor units, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning ct slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a mv‐cbct system in head‐and‐neck patients
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22955643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3766
work_keys_str_mv AT jiamingx impactofdifferentcbctimagingmonitorunitsreconstructionslicethicknessesandplanningctslicethicknessesonthepositioningaccuracyofamvcbctsysteminheadandneckpatients
AT zhangxu impactofdifferentcbctimagingmonitorunitsreconstructionslicethicknessesandplanningctslicethicknessesonthepositioningaccuracyofamvcbctsysteminheadandneckpatients
AT lina impactofdifferentcbctimagingmonitorunitsreconstructionslicethicknessesandplanningctslicethicknessesonthepositioningaccuracyofamvcbctsysteminheadandneckpatients
AT hanchengb impactofdifferentcbctimagingmonitorunitsreconstructionslicethicknessesandplanningctslicethicknessesonthepositioningaccuracyofamvcbctsysteminheadandneckpatients